Compare performance (130 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 22,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Kangoo or Vauxhall Combo Cargo?
In the competitive world of commercial vehicles, the Opel Combo Cargo and Renault Kangoo stand out as versatile solutions for businesses in need of reliable transport. With each offering distinctive characteristics and innovative features, we delve into a comprehensive comparison to help potential buyers make an informed decision.
The Opel Combo Cargo is designed as a robust cargo van, primarily catering to professionals requiring a spacious and utilitarian vehicle. With an impressive length of up to 4753 mm, a width of 1848 mm, and a height between 1820 mm to 1825 mm, it provides substantial interior space for cargo.
On the other hand, the Renault Kangoo takes the form of a high-roof wagon, measuring up to 4911 mm in length and 1860-1919 mm in width. The height ranges from 1838 mm to 1869 mm, providing an airy feel and practical headroom for passengers or goods.
Both vehicles offer a range of engine options. The Opel Combo Cargo comes with diesel, petrol, and electric variants, boasting power outputs from 102 to 136 HP. The maximum torque ranges from 205 to 300 Nm, thereby delivering commendable performance on both urban roads and motorways. In terms of fuel efficiency, it offers a consumption figure of around 5.4 to 6.7 L/100 km, making it a cost-effective choice for businesses.
In contrast, the Renault Kangoo offers power outputs from 95 to 130 HP with a torque range from 200 to 270 Nm. Fuel consumption figures slightly vary, ranging from 5.2 to 7.1 L/100 km, demonstrating efficiency that meets the demands of most commercial users.
Both the Combo Cargo and Kangoo utilize front-wheel drive systems, facilitating improved handling and traction, especially when laden. The Opel Combo Cargo provides options for manual and automatic transmissions, including reduction gearboxes for enhanced control under heavy loads. The Renault Kangoo, similarly, offers manual and dual-clutch automatic gearboxes, providing smooth transitions and responsive driving experiences.
When it comes to interior configurations, the Opel Combo Cargo accommodates up to six passengers with strategically placed storage solutions, ensuring practicality while maintaining comfort. Its impressive payload capacity ranges from 536 to 916 kg, making it ideal for transporting commercial goods.
The Renault Kangoo, however, is designed for versatility with options for up to seven seats. The trunk capacity varies significantly, from 500 to 950 litres, depending on the configuration. This adaptability makes it perfect not only for businesses but also for family outings.
Both models are equipped with state-of-the-art technology. The Opel Combo Cargo often features advanced driver assistance systems, including lane departure warnings and automatic emergency braking, enhancing safety for the driver and surrounding vehicles.
Likewise, the Renault Kangoo showcases innovative technologies, from its intuitive infotainment system to various connectivity features. The Kangoo also offers a unique multi-position roof rack, accommodating various load types and enhancing utility.
With the rise of environmental awareness in transportation, both models offer electric alternatives. The Opel Combo Cargo's electric variant boasts an impressive range of up to 336 km on a single charge, with energy consumption between 18.6 to 19.2 kWh/100 km. In contrast, the Kangoo’s electric version provides a slightly lower range of 278 km but still serves well for urban applications, consuming about 20.2 kWh/100 km.
Choosing between the Opel Combo Cargo and Renault Kangoo ultimately depends on specific business needs. If you require higher payload capacity and commendable fuel efficiency, the Combo Cargo may be the answer. However, if versatility and innovative features are at the forefront of your requirements, the Kangoo could be a better fit.
Both vehicles represent significant advancements in the commercial vehicle segment, ensuring that businesses can operate efficiently while adapting to modern demands and challenges.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Vauxhall Combo Cargo is moderately cheaper – starting at 22,400 £ , while the Renault Kangoo costs 25,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,274 £.
Both cars consume an average of 5.2 L/100km – no difference here.
In terms of energy consumption, the Vauxhall Combo Cargo is slightly more efficient: consuming 17.4 kWh/100km compared to 20.2 kWh/100km for the Renault Kangoo. That’s a difference of about 2.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Vauxhall Combo Cargo offers moderately more range – reaching up to 354 km, about 69 km more than the Renault Kangoo.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Vauxhall Combo Cargo offers very slightly more power – delivering 136 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 6 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Vauxhall Combo Cargo is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 11.2 s, while the Renault Kangoo takes 11.6 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Vauxhall Combo Cargo is clearly faster – reaching 183 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo tops out at 135 km/h. The difference is around 48 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Vauxhall Combo Cargo delivers very slightly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Renault Kangoo offers more seats – 7 vs 6.
In terms of curb weight, Vauxhall Combo Cargo is somewhat lighter – 1,329 kg compared to 1,489 kg. The difference is around 160 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the Vauxhall Combo Cargo offers visibly more capacity – up to 3,900 L, about 850 L more than the Renault Kangoo.
When it comes to payload, the Vauxhall Combo Cargo carries visibly more – 991 kg compared to 610 kg. That’s a difference of about 381 kg.
The Vauxhall Combo Cargo holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Kangoo is the pragmatic chameleon of small vans, marrying van-like practicality with carlike comfort and a cheerful, friendly face that suits both family runs and workday hauls. It's sensible, versatile and annoyingly useful — easy to live with, cheap to run and clever where it counts, so you get more space and fewer compromises than the price suggests.
details
The Opel Combo Cargo is a pragmatic workhorse that pairs sensible practicality with surprisingly car-like manners, making it a smart choice for small businesses and weekend DIYers. With clever storage, easy access and a calm cabin that keeps the focus on the job, it turns daily deliveries and errands into something almost enjoyable.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,700 - 36,200 £
|
Price
22,400 - 34,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.2 - 21.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
278 - 285 km
|
Electric Range
354 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 168 g/km
|
co2
0 - 143 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
53 - 61 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
2 - 6
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1,489 - 2,041 kg
|
Curb weight
1,329 - 1,813 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 950 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,486 - 4,911 mm
|
Length
4,401 - 4,751 mm
|
|
Width
1,860 - 1,919 mm
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
|
Height
1,838 - 1,869 mm
|
Height
1,820 - 1,825 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,500 - 3,050 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3,300 - 3,900 L
|
|
Payload
459 - 610 kg
|
Payload
611 - 991 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 16.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
130 - 135 km/h
|
Max Speed
135 - 183 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Vauxhall
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España