VS

Renault Master Transporter vs VW Polo comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 207 HP), boot space and price (38,600 £ vs 17,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Master Transporter or VW Polo?

Renault Master Transporter vs VW Polo: Key differences

Renault Master Transporter

details

VW Polo

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • a bit more power
  • noticeably more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Master Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW Polo is substantially cheaper – starting at 17,300 £ , while the Renault Master Transporter costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,389 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Polo uses 5.1 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Renault Master Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.

Polo

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the VW Polo offers a bit more power – delivering 207 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Polo is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.5 s, while the Renault Master Transporter takes 13.5 s. That’s about 7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Master Transporter delivers slightly more torque with 380 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: VW Polo offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, VW Polo is substantially lighter – 1,143 kg compared to 2,128 kg. The difference is around 985 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Master Transporter carries clearly more – 1,846 kg compared to 457 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,389 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW Polo is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,300
Polo

VW Polo

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 80 - 207 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota Yaris
VW Polo
VS
Choosing between the Toyota Yaris and the VW Polo comes down to whether you prioritise reliability and efficiency or a more refined drive and cabin quality. Both are compact, practical hatchbacks ideal for city life, but the Yaris leans toward excellent fuel economy and low running costs while the …
VW Polo
VW ID.Polo
VS
The VW Polo and the VW ID. Polo are compact hatchbacks aimed at the same city buyers, but they take very different approaches: the Polo remains a refined petrol (with mild‑hybrid options) mainstream choice, while the ID. Polo is Volkswagen’s fully electric small hatch. This comparison focuses on …
Renault Master Transporter
VW Polo

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Master Transporter

The Renault Master is a pragmatic workhorse that swallows cargo with an unbothered grin, offering clever practicality and load-friendly packaging for tradespeople and fleet buyers. It won’t excite like a sports car, but it steers predictably, runs economically and gets the job done day after day — like a reliable colleague who never calls in sick.

details
serpimg_2EkqG5

Reviews Renault Master Transporter

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

VW Polo

The Polo is a well-built, comfortable hatchback that blends a refined cabin and composed manners into a compact package. It's easy to live with day to day, offering sensible space, tidy controls and reassuring quality that make it a practical choice for city or longer trips.

details
DB2021AU00726_medium
DB2021AU00728_medium
DB2021AU00732_medium
DB2021AU00735_medium
DB2021AU00736_medium
DB2021AU00741_medium

Reviews VW Polo

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
Michel
13 Jun 2026, 15:24:46

Nice, spacious car with many options available (panoramic roof and travel assist).

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

VW Polo
VW Taigo
VS
The VW Polo is the sharp, no-nonsense hatchback that nails everyday practicality — nimble in town, economical to run and pleasantly composed on the motorway. The VW Taigo swaps a bit of luggage room and rear headroom for SUV flair, higher seating and a more eye-catching cabin, so pick the Polo for …
VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
Toyota Aygo
VW Polo
VS
Choosing between the Toyota Aygo and the Volkswagen Polo comes down to whether you want an ultra-compact city runabout or a more practical small hatchback with extra refinement. The Aygo is ideal for tight urban driving and low running costs, while the Polo delivers greater comfort, safety kit and …
Nissan Interstar
Renault Master Transporter
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Interstar and the Renault Master comes down to balancing payload, practicality and running costs for light commercial use. This comparison will cover cargo capacity, engines, fuel economy, driving comfort and ownership costs so you can pick the van that best fits your …
Ford Puma
VW Polo
VS
Comparing the Ford Puma and the VW Polo comes down to choosing between a compact crossover that brings extra practicality and a semi-sporty feel (the Puma) and a traditional supermini that prioritizes refinement, build quality and precise handling (the VW Polo). Both are excellent everyday cars — …
VW Polo
Skoda Epiq
VS
Deciding between the VW Polo and the Skoda Epiq comes down to whether you prefer the Polo’s compact, refined hatchback package or the Epiq’s more modern, practicality-focused offering. This comparison will cover driving dynamics, interior space, running costs and ownership value to help you choose …
SEAT Arona
VW Polo
VS
SEAT Arona and VW Polo go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Kia Picanto
VW Polo
VS
Kia Picanto and VW Polo go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Renault Master Transporter
VW Polo

Costs and Consumption
Price
38,600 - 54,600 £
Price
17,300 - 30,800 £
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 12.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
22.6 - 25.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
177 - 448 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 318 g/km
co2
116 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
3
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,128 - 2,598 kg
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,378 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
351 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,080 mm
Width
1,751 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
902 - 1,846 kg
Payload
432 - 457 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Power HP
80 - 207 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 15.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Torque
93 - 320 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Power kW
59 - 152 kW
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Renault
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the Renault Master Transporter?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.