VS

Renault Trafic Transporter vs Volvo EX90 comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (38,100 £ vs 72,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Trafic Transporter or Volvo EX90?

Renault Trafic Transporter vs Volvo EX90: Key differences

Renault Trafic Transporter

  • substantially cheaper
  • visibly lighter
details

Volvo EX90

3.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • significantly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Trafic Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Trafic Transporter is substantially cheaper – starting at 38,100 £ , while the Volvo EX90 costs 72,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 34,065 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX90 is somewhat more efficient: consuming 17.8 kWh/100km compared to 21.2 kWh/100km for the Renault Trafic Transporter. That’s a difference of about 3.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX90 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 620 km, about 302 km more than the Renault Trafic Transporter.

EX90

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX90 offers significantly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 510 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX90 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Renault Trafic Transporter takes 10.8 s. That’s about 6.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX90 delivers clearly more torque with 870 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 490 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Volvo EX90 offers more seats – 7 vs 6.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Trafic Transporter is visibly lighter – 1,848 kg compared to 2,555 kg. The difference is around 707 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Trafic Transporter carries considerably more – 1,222 kg compared to 605 kg. That’s a difference of about 617 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX90 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £72,200
EX90

Volvo EX90

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 333 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 570 - 620 km
Renault Trafic Transporter
Volvo EX90

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Renault Trafic Transporter

The Renault Trafic is a practical, workhorse transporter that hides thoughtful cabin comfort behind a tough, utilitarian exterior, so you can tackle a busy week without sacrificing sanity. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want reliability and clever flexibility rather than flash, with just enough character to make daily hauling feel less like a chore.

details

Volvo EX90

The Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.

details
Renault Trafic Transporter
Volvo EX90

Costs and Consumption

Price
38,100 - 43,500 £
Price
72,200 - 91,700 £
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 22.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
240 - 318 km
Electric Range
570 - 620 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 184 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
3 - 6
Seats
6 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,848 - 2,075 kg
Curb weight
2,555 - 2,765 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,956 mm
Width
1,964 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
899 - 1,222 kg
Payload
545 - 605 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 - 170 HP
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 - 13.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
245 - 380 Nm
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
90 - 125 kW
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Renault
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.