Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Rolls-Royce Cullinan vs Land Rover Range Rover comparison
Compare performance (600 HP vs 550 HP), boot space and price (275,400 £ vs 125,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Rolls-Royce Cullinan or Land Rover Range Rover?
Rolls-Royce Cullinan vs Land Rover Range Rover: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Cullinan
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Land Rover Range Rover is considerably cheaper – starting at 125,200 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 150,172 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover uses 2.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 13.2 L/100km.
Range Rover
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers only slightly more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 550 HP. That’s roughly 50 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan takes 4.9 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers slightly more torque with 900 Nm compared to 800 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover is barely lighter – 2,504 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 156 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers noticeably more boot space – 818 L compared to 555 L. That’s a difference of about 263 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover carries barely more – 846 kg compared to 840 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Range Rover is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £125,200
Land Rover Range Rover
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.
details
Land Rover Range Rover
The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.
details
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
|
Price
125,200 - 275,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
115 - 116 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
363 - 380 g/km
|
co2
62 - 267 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,660 kg
|
Curb weight
2,504 - 2,810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
555 L
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,000 mm
|
Width
2,047 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
840 kg
|
Payload
645 - 846 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
|
Power HP
300 - 550 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
|
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
12
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
|
Power kW
221 - 405 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Rolls-Royce
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.