VS

SERES 3 vs Volvo XC40 – Differences & prices compared

Two cars, one duel: SERES 3 meets Volvo XC40.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

SERES 3 has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 31600 £, while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 5125 £.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 has a a bit edge – offering 197 HP compared to 163 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the SERES 3 takes 9.90 s. That’s about 2.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Volvo XC40 performs a bit better – reaching 180 km/h, while the SERES 3 tops out at 155 km/h. The difference is around 25 km/h.

Both models offer the same torque – 300 Nm.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is minimal lighter – 1688 kg compared to 1765 kg. The difference is around 77 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers convincingly more room – 452 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 452 L.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 convincingly takes the win – 532 kg compared to 300 kg. That’s a difference of about 232 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Volvo XC40 shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £36,800
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior

Volvo XC40

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 163 - 197 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 6.50 L
details

SERES 3

The SERES 3 marks an intriguing entry into the electric vehicle market, distinguished by its sleek design and advanced technology features. This compact SUV offers a commendable driving experience with its smooth handling and quick acceleration, making it a strong contender in urban environments. Additionally, the SERES 3 boasts a well-equipped interior, providing both comfort and connectivity for modern drivers.

details

Volvo XC40

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo XC40 is a standout model in the compact SUV segment, offering a delightful blend of Scandinavian design and practicality. Its interior is both stylish and functional, featuring premium materials and innovative storage solutions that make every journey comfortable. The car's performance is smooth and responsive, with advanced safety features ensuring peace of mind for drivers and passengers alike.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ media.volvocars.com
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ media.volvocars.com
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ media.volvocars.com
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ media.volvocars.com
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ media.volvocars.com

Similar Comparisons

Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a plush cabin, class-leading safety tech and Scandinavian style, so pay extra if you want flair, refinement and that "I’m-driving-something-special" feeling.
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go Kuga; if you prefer a calmer, premium feel and a car that looks after you like a very fashionable safety blanket, choose the XC40.
SERES 3
Volvo XC40
XC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
31600 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
18 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
301 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1765 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
0 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4385 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1850 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1650 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
300 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.90 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
155 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
300 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
120 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2020
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
SERES
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Volvo XC40
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more personality for less cash.
Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers petrol, hybrid and electric options plus proven practicality. Go for the EX40 if you want cutting‑edge EV efficiency and playful agility; pick the XC40 if you value versatility, a broader engine choice and tried‑and‑tested everyday usefulness.
Toyota Corolla Cross
Volvo XC40
VS
The Toyota Corolla Cross is the sensible, wallet-friendly compact SUV that delivers Toyota reliability, efficient engines and roomy practicality for everyday life, while the Volvo XC40 trades bargain-basement charm for premium materials, sharper handling and a cocoon of Scandinavian safety tech. If you want low running costs and uncomplicated usefulness, the Corolla Cross is your no-nonsense winner; if you prefer style, advanced driver aids and a badge that subtly screams “I care about safety (and design),” splurge on the XC40.
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq and the Volvo XC40 go head-to-head in the compact SUV segment, each bringing unique advantages to potential buyers. The Karoq impresses with its practicality, offering generous cargo space and efficient engine options, making it an ideal choice for families and long journeys. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 stands out with its chic Scandinavian design and advanced safety features, appealing to buyers with a penchant for style and cutting-edge technology.
CUPRA Terramar
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table, catering to different preferences in the increasingly popular market.
Honda HR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda HR-V stands out for its versatile cargo space and user-friendly technology, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 impresses with its upscale interior and advanced safety features, appealing to those seeking luxury and peace of mind. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on whether practicality or premium comfort takes precedence in your driving experience.
Toyota C-HR
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Toyota C-HR and Volvo XC40 each bring their own unique flair to the table. While the C-HR impresses with its bold design and exceptional reliability, the XC40 stands out with its premium interior and cutting-edge technology. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on whether buyers prioritize style and affordability or luxury and innovation.
CUPRA Formentor
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a reputation for safety and comfort. Ultimately, the decision between these two distinctive models hinges on personal preferences for driving engagement versus everyday usability.
What drive types are available for the SERES 3?

The SERES 3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.