Compare performance (340 HP vs 212 HP), boot space and price (37900 £ vs 27400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Elroq or BYD Atto 2?
In the rapidly evolving world of electric vehicles, two formidable players step into the spotlight: the Skoda Elroq and the BYD Atto 2. Both SUVs promise a thrilling ride paired with cutting-edge technology, but how do they stack up against each other? Let’s delve into the technical aspects and innovations offered by these automotive contenders.
Visually, both the Skoda Elroq and the BYD Atto 2 boast a modern SUV design, but they differ in size and styling cues. The Elroq stretches to a length of 4488mm, with a width of 1884mm and a height of 1625mm, offering a robust presence on the road. Its trunk capacity of 470 liters ensures ample cargo space for weekend getaways.
Conversely, the Atto 2 is slightly more compact at 4310mm in length, 1830mm in width, and a taller stature at 1675mm. It offers a 400-liter trunk capacity, emphasizing a balance of practicality and urban agility.
Both models are powered by electric propulsion systems, each offering distinctive driving experiences. The Skoda Elroq features rear-wheel drive, providing a dynamic and sporty feel, with power outputs ranging from 170-286 HP, depending on the variant. Its acceleration from 0-100 km/h varies from a quick 6.6 seconds to a comfortable 9 seconds, making it versatile for varied driving tastes.
The BYD Atto 2, on the other hand, opts for a front-wheel drive system with a steady 177 HP. It manages a slightly faster 0-100 km/h sprint in 7.9 seconds, indicating a well-balanced power-to-efficiency ratio.
Range is a crucial factor for electric vehicle buyers, and here the Elroq offers more flexibility. Depending on the battery capacity chosen (52-77 kWh), it delivers an electric range between 375 to 580 km. This impressive distance potentially lessens range anxiety for longer journeys.
The Atto 2, with its 312 km range from a full charge, aligns well with daily commuting needs and urban adventures, offering a suitable choice for those not venturing far from home base frequently.
The Skoda Elroq incorporates futuristic technology, with innovative features reflecting Skoda’s commitment to sustainability. An automatic transmission with a reduction gearbox, paired with a torque range of 310 to 545 Nm, ensures seamless power delivery and enhances driving comfort.
BYD’s Atto 2 is no less impressive, boasting a solid 290 Nm torque alongside its automatic transmission, guaranteeing swift responsiveness and a satisfying driving experience.
Both the Skoda Elroq and BYD Atto 2 exemplify the potential of future electric SUVs, each catering to different user preferences. The Elroq is ideal for those seeking longer ranges and a more dynamic driving experience, while the Atto 2 stands out with its compact design and straightforward efficiency.
Ultimately, choosing between these electric SUVs depends on individual priorities—whether it’s extended range and rear-wheel driving excitement or the practicality of a more compact urban SUV with front-wheel drive prowess. Both are commendable players in the electric vehicle arena, pushing the limits of innovation and eco-friendly transportation forward.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
BYD Atto 2 has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 27400 £ , while the Skoda Elroq costs 37900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10448 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Elroq: with 15.20 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the BYD Atto 2 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.60 kWh.
As for electric range, the Skoda Elroq performs evident better – achieving up to 573 km, about 143 km more than the BYD Atto 2.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 340 HP compared to 212 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Elroq is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the BYD Atto 2 takes 7.50 s. That’s about 2.10 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Elroq pulls clearly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 310 Nm. That’s about 369 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, BYD Atto 2 is clearly lighter – 1510 kg compared to 2133 kg. The difference is around 623 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Elroq offers slight more room – 470 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 20 L.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Elroq hardly perceptible takes the win – 517 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 27 kg.
The Skoda Elroq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Elroq is a cleverly packaged family SUV that mixes roomy practicality with sharp, modern looks, making it an easy pick for buyers who prefer common sense over flash. On the road it's composed and user-friendly, with thoughtful interior details that turn everyday driving into something pleasantly efficient — a sensible companion with a wink.
details
The Atto 2 is making waves in the electric vehicle market with its sleek design and impressive range. This innovative model combines cutting-edge technology with captivating aesthetics, making it a standout choice for eco-conscious drivers. With its spacious interior and advanced features, the Atto 2 offers both comfort and convenience for everyday use.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37900 - 45500 £
|
Price
27400 - 36000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
529 - 573 km
|
Electric Range
40 - 430 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
77 - 79 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 41 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2133 - 2268 kg
|
Curb weight
1510 - 1720 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
Trunk capacity
400 - 450 L
|
|
Length
4488 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1884 mm
|
Width
1830 mm
|
|
Height
1608 - 1625 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1580 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
470 - 517 kg
|
Payload
260 - 490 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
166 - 212 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 9.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 310 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
122 - 156 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
BYD
|
Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España