Compare performance (340 HP vs 212 HP), boot space and price (32,000 £ vs 27,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Elroq or BYD Atto 2?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the rapidly evolving world of electric vehicles, two formidable players step into the spotlight: the Skoda Elroq and the BYD Atto 2. Both SUVs promise a thrilling ride paired with cutting-edge technology, but how do they stack up against each other? Let’s delve into the technical aspects and innovations offered by these automotive contenders.
Visually, both the Skoda Elroq and the BYD Atto 2 boast a modern SUV design, but they differ in size and styling cues. The Elroq stretches to a length of 4488mm, with a width of 1884mm and a height of 1625mm, offering a robust presence on the road. Its trunk capacity of 470 liters ensures ample cargo space for weekend getaways.
Conversely, the Atto 2 is slightly more compact at 4310mm in length, 1830mm in width, and a taller stature at 1675mm. It offers a 400-liter trunk capacity, emphasizing a balance of practicality and urban agility.
Both models are powered by electric propulsion systems, each offering distinctive driving experiences. The Skoda Elroq features rear-wheel drive, providing a dynamic and sporty feel, with power outputs ranging from 170-286 HP, depending on the variant. Its acceleration from 0-100 km/h varies from a quick 6.6 seconds to a comfortable 9 seconds, making it versatile for varied driving tastes.
The BYD Atto 2, on the other hand, opts for a front-wheel drive system with a steady 177 HP. It manages a slightly faster 0-100 km/h sprint in 7.9 seconds, indicating a well-balanced power-to-efficiency ratio.
Range is a crucial factor for electric vehicle buyers, and here the Elroq offers more flexibility. Depending on the battery capacity chosen (52-77 kWh), it delivers an electric range between 375 to 580 km. This impressive distance potentially lessens range anxiety for longer journeys.
The Atto 2, with its 312 km range from a full charge, aligns well with daily commuting needs and urban adventures, offering a suitable choice for those not venturing far from home base frequently.
The Skoda Elroq incorporates futuristic technology, with innovative features reflecting Skoda’s commitment to sustainability. An automatic transmission with a reduction gearbox, paired with a torque range of 310 to 545 Nm, ensures seamless power delivery and enhances driving comfort.
BYD’s Atto 2 is no less impressive, boasting a solid 290 Nm torque alongside its automatic transmission, guaranteeing swift responsiveness and a satisfying driving experience.
Both the Skoda Elroq and BYD Atto 2 exemplify the potential of future electric SUVs, each catering to different user preferences. The Elroq is ideal for those seeking longer ranges and a more dynamic driving experience, while the Atto 2 stands out with its compact design and straightforward efficiency.
Ultimately, choosing between these electric SUVs depends on individual priorities—whether it’s extended range and rear-wheel driving excitement or the practicality of a more compact urban SUV with front-wheel drive prowess. Both are commendable players in the electric vehicle arena, pushing the limits of innovation and eco-friendly transportation forward.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
BYD Atto 2 is moderately cheaper – starting at 27,400 £ , while the Skoda Elroq costs 32,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,628 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Elroq is barely more efficient: consuming 15.1 kWh/100km compared to 15.8 kWh/100km for the BYD Atto 2. That’s a difference of about 0.7 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Elroq offers visibly more range – reaching up to 574 km, about 144 km more than the BYD Atto 2.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq offers noticeably more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 212 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Elroq is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the BYD Atto 2 takes 7.5 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Elroq delivers substantially more torque with 679 Nm compared to 310 Nm. That’s about 369 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BYD Atto 2 is clearly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 2,036 kg. The difference is around 526 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Elroq offers very slightly more boot space – 470 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 20 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Elroq carries a bit more – 549 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 59 kg.
The Skoda Elroq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Elroq is a sensible, comfort‑focused compact electric SUV that puts a premium on a roomy rear seat, quiet long‑distance manners and straightforward, low‑distraction controls — perfect for families and commuters who value everyday usability. Its practical Simply‑Clever touches and strong value make it a convincing all‑rounder, though those chasing class‑leading fast charging or the most flexible boot space might look elsewhere.
details
The Atto 2 is making waves in the electric vehicle market with its sleek design and impressive range. This innovative model combines cutting-edge technology with captivating aesthetics, making it a standout choice for eco-conscious drivers. With its spacious interior and advanced features, the Atto 2 offers both comfort and convenience for everyday use.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
32,000 - 47,000 £
|
Price
27,400 - 36,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
441 - 574 km
|
Electric Range
40 - 430 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 41 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,036 - 2,255 kg
|
Curb weight
1,510 - 1,720 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
Trunk capacity
400 - 450 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,884 mm
|
Width
1,830 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
482 - 549 kg
|
Payload
260 - 490 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
166 - 212 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 9.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 310 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
122 - 156 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
BYD
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España