@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
VS

Skoda Fabia vs Suzuki Swift – Which one offers the better deal?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Skoda Fabia or Suzuki Swift fits your lifestyle better.

Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Head-to-Head: Skoda Fabia vs. Suzuki Swift

The automotive market is ever-evolving, and with it comes fierce competition among compact hatchbacks. In this article, we dive into a detailed comparison between two popular choices: the Skoda Fabia and the Suzuki Swift. Both vehicles offer strong attributes, but which one emerges as the best compact hatchback for consumers in 2024? Let's take a closer look at their technical specifications and innovations.

Swift @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance

The Skoda Fabia boasts a variety of petrol engine options, ranging from 80 HP to a powerful 150 HP, providing drivers ample choices based on their performance preferences. With 3 and 4-cylinder options, consumers can also customize their driving experience depending on personal needs. Notably, power delivery is efficient, with top speeds reaching up to 225 km/h and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 8 seconds, particularly impressive for a car in this segment.

On the other hand, the Suzuki Swift features a less diverse engine lineup, offering a single petrol MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle) engine rated at 82 HP. The Swift performs adequately with a top speed of 170 km/h and a modest acceleration time, reflecting its focus on efficiency rather than raw power.

Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

When it comes to fuel consumption, the Fabia stands at an attractive range of 5 to 5.5 L/100 km, making it a relatively efficient option amidst its peers. Additionally, its CO2 emissions fall within the D and C efficiency classes, contributing to lower environmental impact values compared to older vehicles.

The Swift excels even further in this category, showcasing impressive fuel consumption figures between 4.4 and 4.9 L/100 km. Its CO2 emissions are commendably low, ranging from 98 to 110 g/km, indicating a more environmentally friendly choice for eco-conscious consumers.

Swift @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Interior Space and Comfort

Space and comfort are crucial aspects of any hatchback, and the Fabia shines in this respect. With a trunk capacity of 380 liters, it offers best-in-class cargo space, allowing drivers to carry more baggage and groceries. The cabin features ample legroom for five passengers, enhancing the overall driving experience.

The Suzuki Swift, however, provides a more compact experience with a trunk capacity of just 265 liters. While it comfortably seats five, the overall cabin space may feel slightly constrained compared to the Fabia, making it less suitable for long family trips.

Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Driving Dynamics

Driving dynamics significantly enhance the enjoyment of any car. The Skoda Fabia offers a front-wheel-drive layout with both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, allowing drivers to select their preference. This flexibility transforms the driving experience, catering to enthusiasts and daily commuters alike.

The Suzuki Swift comes equipped with front-wheel-drive options and allows for an all-wheel-drive variant, which can be appealing for those needing extra traction in varying weather conditions. Also available in manual and CVT (continuously variable transmission), the Swift provides a smooth and responsive driving experience.

Swift @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Conclusion: Which One to Choose?

Ultimately, the choice between the Skoda Fabia and Suzuki Swift will depend heavily on consumer priorities. The Fabia impresses with its powerful engines, spacious interior, and strong performance, making it ideal for those needing a versatile hatchback. Conversely, the Swift excels in fuel efficiency and environmental concerns, making it an excellent option for users seeking lower running costs and eco-friendliness.

Both vehicles are worthy contenders in the compact hatchback segment, and your choice will hinge on your personal requirements and driving habits. A test drive is highly recommended to see which model resonates with you the most.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Fabia has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16900 £, while the Suzuki Swift costs 17100 £. That’s a price difference of around 265 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Suzuki Swift manages with 4.40 L and is therefore a bit more efficient than the Skoda Fabia with 4.90 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.

Swift @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Fabia has a significantly edge – offering 177 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 95 HP more horsepower.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Fabia performs evident better – reaching 228 km/h, while the Suzuki Swift tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 58 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Fabia pulls clearly stronger with 250 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 138 Nm difference.

Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Suzuki Swift is minimal lighter – 1069 kg compared to 1143 kg. The difference is around 74 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Fabia offers noticeable more room – 380 L compared to 265 L. That’s a difference of about 115 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Fabia performs a bit better – up to 1190 L, which is about 210 L more than the Suzuki Swift.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Fabia noticeable takes the win – 437 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 141 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Skoda Fabia proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Fabia is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £16,900
Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Fabia

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 80 - 177 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.6 L
details

Skoda Fabia

The Skoda Fabia is a clever, no-nonsense small car that turns everyday chores into a breeze thanks to smart packaging and a surprisingly roomy cabin. It won’t set your pulses racing, but it’s a consistently sensible choice — reliable, easy to live with and blessed with a few neat tricks that make city life less faff.

details
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116050 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116049 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116061 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Der neue SKODA FABIA Detail_116013 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Der neue SKODA FABIA Interieur_115896 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Suzuki Swift

The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.

details
SUZUKI-519 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
SUZUKI SWIFT-678 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
SUZUKI SWIFT-954 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
SUZUKI-058 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
SUZUKI SWIFT-672 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Swift_3 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai i10
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Hyundai i10 is the sensible city slicker — compact, surprisingly roomy for its size, cheap to run and designed to make parking a confidence exercise rather than a stressful workout. The Suzuki Swift is the cheeky, slightly sportier option with sharper handling and bolder looks, so pick it if …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Fabia
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Scala
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Scala, buyers are treated to two distinct flavors of practicality and style. The Fabia excels as a compact hatchback with a nimble design and generous cargo space, making it ideal for city driving. Meanwhile, the Scala stands out with its …
Skoda Fabia
Suzuki Swift
Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Swift @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
16900 - 30500 £
Price
17100 - 21200 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.6 L
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
112 - 126 g/km
co2
98 - 110 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
Fuel tank capacity
37 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1143 - 1278 kg
Curb weight
1069 - 1145 kg
Trunk capacity
380 L
Trunk capacity
265 L
Length
4108 - 4137 mm
Length
3860 mm
Width
1780 mm
Width
1735 mm
Height
1458 - 1461 mm
Height
1485 - 1510 mm
Max trunk capacity
1190 L
Max trunk capacity
980 L
Payload
402 - 437 kg
Payload
282 - 296 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
80 - 177 HP
Power HP
82 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 15.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
175 - 228 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Torque
93 - 250 Nm
Torque
112 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
59 - 130 kW
Power kW
61 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
Engine capacity
1197 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Suzuki

Similar Comparisons

@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki Swift
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Aygo
VS
If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Fabia
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the latest showdown between the Skoda Fabia and the Skoda Kamiq, both models showcase Skoda's commitment to practicality and style. While the Fabia excels with its compact design and agile handling, making it ideal for urban environments, the Kamiq offers a more rugged stature and higher ride …
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki Ignis
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Suzuki Ignis and Suzuki Swift both cater to drivers looking for compact yet versatile options, but they offer distinct experiences. While the Ignis boasts a quirky, boxy design and spacious interior ideal for urban adventures, the Swift shines with a sportier aesthetic and dynamic driving …
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the SEAT Arona stands out with its sportier design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to buyers looking for a fun-to-drive option. On the other hand, the Skoda Fabia offers a more practical approach, boasting a spacious interior and impressive boot …
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Ibiza
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the SEAT Ibiza showcases its sporty design and agile handling, making it a favorite for urban drivers seeking a bit of flair during their daily commute. Meanwhile, the Skoda Fabia impresses with its practicality and generous interior space, offering a more …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Picanto
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki Swift
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Kia Picanto and Suzuki Swift stand out with their unique blends of style and practicality. The Picanto offers a more spacious interior with user-friendly tech features, making it an excellent option for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the Swift impresses with …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Clio
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the ongoing battle of compact hatchbacks, the Renault Clio and Skoda Fabia have both staked their claim for supremacy. The Clio boasts a stylish design and a reputation for comfort, often appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and innovative tech in their daily drive. Meanwhile, the Fabia …
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki Swift
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Suzuki Swift and Suzuki Vitara go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Fabia have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.