VS

Skoda Fabia vs Suzuki Swift comparison

Compare performance (177 HP vs 82 HP), boot space and price (17,300 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Fabia or Suzuki Swift?

Skoda Fabia vs Suzuki Swift: Key differences

Skoda Fabia

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
details

Suzuki Swift

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • moderately more efficient
  • only slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Fabia

Head-to-Head: Skoda Fabia vs. Suzuki Swift

The automotive market is ever-evolving, and with it comes fierce competition among compact hatchbacks. In this article, we dive into a detailed comparison between two popular choices: the Skoda Fabia and the Suzuki Swift. Both vehicles offer strong attributes, but which one emerges as the best compact hatchback for consumers in 2024? Let's take a closer look at their technical specifications and innovations.

Swift

Engine and Performance

The Skoda Fabia boasts a variety of petrol engine options, ranging from 80 HP to a powerful 150 HP, providing drivers ample choices based on their performance preferences. With 3 and 4-cylinder options, consumers can also customize their driving experience depending on personal needs. Notably, power delivery is efficient, with top speeds reaching up to 225 km/h and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 8 seconds, particularly impressive for a car in this segment.

On the other hand, the Suzuki Swift features a less diverse engine lineup, offering a single petrol MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle) engine rated at 82 HP. The Swift performs adequately with a top speed of 170 km/h and a modest acceleration time, reflecting its focus on efficiency rather than raw power.

Fabia

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

When it comes to fuel consumption, the Fabia stands at an attractive range of 5 to 5.5 L/100 km, making it a relatively efficient option amidst its peers. Additionally, its CO2 emissions fall within the D and C efficiency classes, contributing to lower environmental impact values compared to older vehicles.

The Swift excels even further in this category, showcasing impressive fuel consumption figures between 4.4 and 4.9 L/100 km. Its CO2 emissions are commendably low, ranging from 98 to 110 g/km, indicating a more environmentally friendly choice for eco-conscious consumers.

Swift

Interior Space and Comfort

Space and comfort are crucial aspects of any hatchback, and the Fabia shines in this respect. With a trunk capacity of 380 liters, it offers best-in-class cargo space, allowing drivers to carry more baggage and groceries. The cabin features ample legroom for five passengers, enhancing the overall driving experience.

The Suzuki Swift, however, provides a more compact experience with a trunk capacity of just 265 liters. While it comfortably seats five, the overall cabin space may feel slightly constrained compared to the Fabia, making it less suitable for long family trips.

Fabia

Driving Dynamics

Driving dynamics significantly enhance the enjoyment of any car. The Skoda Fabia offers a front-wheel-drive layout with both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, allowing drivers to select their preference. This flexibility transforms the driving experience, catering to enthusiasts and daily commuters alike.

The Suzuki Swift comes equipped with front-wheel-drive options and allows for an all-wheel-drive variant, which can be appealing for those needing extra traction in varying weather conditions. Also available in manual and CVT (continuously variable transmission), the Swift provides a smooth and responsive driving experience.

Swift

Conclusion: Which One to Choose?

Ultimately, the choice between the Skoda Fabia and Suzuki Swift will depend heavily on consumer priorities. The Fabia impresses with its powerful engines, spacious interior, and strong performance, making it ideal for those needing a versatile hatchback. Conversely, the Swift excels in fuel efficiency and environmental concerns, making it an excellent option for users seeking lower running costs and eco-friendliness.

Both vehicles are worthy contenders in the compact hatchback segment, and your choice will hinge on your personal requirements and driving habits. A test drive is highly recommended to see which model resonates with you the most.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Fabia
Skoda Scala
VS
Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …
Suzuki Swift
Toyota Aygo
VS
If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Fabia

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Suzuki Swift is marginally cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Skoda Fabia costs 17,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 163 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Swift uses 4.4 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Skoda Fabia with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.

Swift

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Fabia offers significantly more power – delivering 177 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 95 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Fabia delivers substantially more torque with 250 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 138 Nm more.

Fabia

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swift is only slightly lighter – 1,069 kg compared to 1,143 kg. The difference is around 74 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Fabia carries noticeably more – 437 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 141 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Fabia is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,300
Fabia

Skoda Fabia

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 80 - 177 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 5.6 L/100km
details
Skoda Fabia
Suzuki Swift

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Fabia

The Skoda Fabia is a clever, no-nonsense small car that turns everyday chores into a breeze thanks to smart packaging and a surprisingly roomy cabin. It won’t set your pulses racing, but it’s a consistently sensible choice — reliable, easy to live with and blessed with a few neat tricks that make city life less faff.

details
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116050
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116049
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116061
Der neue SKODA FABIA Detail_116013
Der neue SKODA FABIA Interieur_115896

Reviews Skoda Fabia

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Suzuki Swift

The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.

details
SUZUKI-519
SUZUKI SWIFT-678
SUZUKI SWIFT-954
SUZUKI-058
SUZUKI SWIFT-672
Swift_3

Reviews Suzuki Swift

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
Kris
9 Apr 2026, 18:26:38

Superb quality, fun to drive, and every bit of well layed out kit you'll ever need.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Kamiq comes down to whether you prefer a practical, efficient supermini or a taller, more versatile compact crossover. The Fabia excels for city driving and low running costs, while the Kamiq offers extra interior space, a higher driving position and …
Suzuki Ignis
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Ignis and the Swift boils down to whether you want a feisty, high-riding city crossover with extra practicality or a more composed, sportier hatch with sharper handling. The Ignis stands out for its compact SUV character and clever packaging, while the Swift delivers a peppier …
Skoda Fabia
VW Golf
VS
Two icons of the small-car world go head-to-head: the Skoda Fabia, the bargain-minded all-rounder, takes on the VW Golf, the class benchmark for driving refinement and pedigree. We’ll compare space, tech, engines and running costs to tell buyers which one delivers the best balance of value, comfort …
Renault Clio
Skoda Fabia
VS
The Renault Clio and the Skoda Fabia are two of Europe's most sensible superminis, each offering a different balance of style, practicality and running costs. This comparison will help you decide whether the Clio’s polished drive and chic design or the Fabia’s roomier interior and everyday …
Skoda Fabia
Toyota Yaris
VS
Deciding between the Škoda Fabia and the Toyota Yaris? Both are accomplished small hatchbacks, with the Fabia prioritizing interior space and value while the Yaris focuses on reliability and fuel efficiency.
Hyundai i20
Skoda Fabia
VS
The Hyundai i20 is the sassy, tech-packed choice — peppy engines, crisp looks and a surprisingly upscale cabin for the money — while the Škoda Fabia plays the practical trump card with cavernous boot space, calm manners and a build-for-the-long-haul sensibility. If you want style and gadgetry that …
Kia Picanto
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Kia Picanto and Suzuki Swift are two popular small hatchbacks that balance low running costs with practical, city-friendly dimensions. This comparison focuses on real-world usability, ownership costs and driving experience to help you pick the right one.
Kia Stonic
Skoda Fabia
VS
Comparing the Kia Stonic and the Skoda Fabia helps you choose between a small crossover with raised ride height and SUV-like style, and a practical supermini that focuses on interior space, comfort and efficiency. I’ll run through the key differences in driving feel, passenger and luggage room, …
Skoda Fabia
Suzuki Swift

Costs and Consumption
Price
17,300 - 30,500 £
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
112 - 126 g/km
co2
98 - 110 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,278 kg
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
Trunk capacity
380 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,780 mm
Width
1,735 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
402 - 437 kg
Payload
282 - 296 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
80 - 177 HP
Power HP
82 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 15.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
93 - 250 Nm
Torque
112 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
59 - 130 kW
Power kW
61 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Suzuki
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Fabia have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.