Compare performance (177 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (16900 £ vs 21400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Fabia or VW T-Cross?
The automotive market is brimming with exciting choices, but two models that stand out in the compact segment are the Skoda Fabia and the VW T-Cross. Each brings its own blend of style, technology, and performance, making them viable contenders for buyers looking for a practical and efficient vehicle. In this comparison, we delve into the technical aspects and innovations of both cars to help you make an informed decision.
The Skoda Fabia features a classic hatchback design that emphasizes practicality and efficiency. With dimensions measuring 4108 mm in length and 1780 mm in width, it strikes a balance between a compact silhouette and ample interior space. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross brings the stylish demeanor of an SUV, measuring 4127 mm in length and slightly wider at 1784 mm. Its taller height of 1573 mm offers a commanding view of the road, attracting buyers who prefer a higher driving position.
Under the hood, both models are equipped with petrol engine options that serve different driving needs. The Skoda Fabia offers a range of engine powers from 80 to 150 HP, catering primarily to those valuing economy and everyday usability. Its acceleration capabilities vary, with the quickest variant reaching 100 km/h in just 8 seconds, showcasing impressive performance for a compact hatchback.
On the other hand, the VW T-Cross is powered by engines delivering between 95 to 150 HP, with its top-performing variant sprinting from 0 to 100 km/h in as quick as 8.4 seconds. While both vehicles promote efficiency, the T-Cross's fuel consumption ranges between 5.6 to 6 L/100 km, making it slightly less economical compared to the Fabia, which manages an impressive 5 to 5.5 L/100 km, emphasizing its suitability for city commutes and extended drives alike.
Both the Skoda Fabia and VW T-Cross come packed with modern technology aimed at enhancing driver convenience and safety. The Fabia features innovative infotainment systems, including smartphone integration and connectivity options that cater to today’s tech-savvy consumers. Additionally, it includes advanced driver-assistance systems that prioritize safety on the road.
Similarly, the T-Cross is equipped with cutting-edge technology, including an intuitive touchscreen interface and an array of safety features. This SUV model also supports a variety of driver assistance technologies, which enhance the driving experience and provide peace of mind for family-oriented buyers.
Space is a critical factor for potential buyers, especially those with families or active lifestyles. The Skoda Fabia offers a commendable trunk capacity of 380 liters, providing adequate storage for daily errands and spontaneous trips. Meanwhile, the T-Cross excels in this category, boasting an impressive trunk capacity of 455 liters, offering even more versatility for transporting goods and gear.
Both cars can comfortably seat five people, ensuring enough room for passengers regardless of the journey length. The elevated stance of the T-Cross allows for better headroom and a more spacious feel, which can be an appealing factor for taller drivers and passengers.
Deciding between the Skoda Fabia and the VW T-Cross boils down to personal preference and specific needs. If you prioritize a compact hatchback with superb fuel efficiency and an agile drive, the Skoda Fabia might be your best bet. However, if an SUV with extra space, a commanding driving position, and stylish design appeals more to your lifestyle, then the VW T-Cross would make a compelling choice.
Both vehicles shine in their respective categories, ensuring that whether you go with the Fabia or the T-Cross, you are choosing a car that embodies innovation, comfort, and performance.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Fabia has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16900 £ , while the VW T-Cross costs 21400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4517 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Fabia manages with 4.90 L and is therefore a bit more efficient than the VW T-Cross with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Fabia has a somewhat edge – offering 177 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Fabia is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.40 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
Both models offer the same torque – 250 Nm.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Fabia is a bit lighter – 1143 kg compared to 1267 kg. The difference is around 124 kg.
In terms of boot space, the VW T-Cross offers somewhat more room – 455 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 75 L.
When it comes to payload, VW T-Cross barely noticeable takes the win – 480 kg compared to 437 kg. That’s a difference of about 43 kg.
The Skoda Fabia holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Fabia is a clever, no-nonsense small car that turns everyday chores into a breeze thanks to smart packaging and a surprisingly roomy cabin. It won’t set your pulses racing, but it’s a consistently sensible choice — reliable, easy to live with and blessed with a few neat tricks that make city life less faff.
details
The VW T-Cross turns everyday practicality into a style statement, offering a roomy-feeling cabin, clever storage and playful design that suits town life and family duties alike. On the road it's composed and relaxed, rewarding buyers who want the raised seating and confident presence of an SUV without the weighty compromises.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
16900 - 30500 £
|
Price
21400 - 32000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
112 - 126 g/km
|
co2
124 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1143 - 1278 kg
|
Curb weight
1267 - 1338 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
380 L
|
Trunk capacity
455 L
|
|
Length
4108 - 4137 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1780 mm
|
Width
1784 mm
|
|
Height
1458 - 1461 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1190 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
402 - 437 kg
|
Payload
463 - 480 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
80 - 177 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 15.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
175 - 228 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
93 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
59 - 130 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
VW
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España