@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VS

Skoda Fabia vs VW T-Cross – Which one offers the better deal?

Two cars, one duel: Skoda Fabia meets VW T-Cross.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

The automotive market is brimming with exciting choices, but two models that stand out in the compact segment are the Skoda Fabia and the VW T-Cross. Each brings its own blend of style, technology, and performance, making them viable contenders for buyers looking for a practical and efficient vehicle. In this comparison, we delve into the technical aspects and innovations of both cars to help you make an informed decision.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Design and Body Type

The Skoda Fabia features a classic hatchback design that emphasizes practicality and efficiency. With dimensions measuring 4108 mm in length and 1780 mm in width, it strikes a balance between a compact silhouette and ample interior space. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross brings the stylish demeanor of an SUV, measuring 4127 mm in length and slightly wider at 1784 mm. Its taller height of 1573 mm offers a commanding view of the road, attracting buyers who prefer a higher driving position.

Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Performance and Engine Options

Under the hood, both models are equipped with petrol engine options that serve different driving needs. The Skoda Fabia offers a range of engine powers from 80 to 150 HP, catering primarily to those valuing economy and everyday usability. Its acceleration capabilities vary, with the quickest variant reaching 100 km/h in just 8 seconds, showcasing impressive performance for a compact hatchback.

On the other hand, the VW T-Cross is powered by engines delivering between 95 to 150 HP, with its top-performing variant sprinting from 0 to 100 km/h in as quick as 8.4 seconds. While both vehicles promote efficiency, the T-Cross's fuel consumption ranges between 5.6 to 6 L/100 km, making it slightly less economical compared to the Fabia, which manages an impressive 5 to 5.5 L/100 km, emphasizing its suitability for city commutes and extended drives alike.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Technology and Innovations

Both the Skoda Fabia and VW T-Cross come packed with modern technology aimed at enhancing driver convenience and safety. The Fabia features innovative infotainment systems, including smartphone integration and connectivity options that cater to today’s tech-savvy consumers. Additionally, it includes advanced driver-assistance systems that prioritize safety on the road.

Similarly, the T-Cross is equipped with cutting-edge technology, including an intuitive touchscreen interface and an array of safety features. This SUV model also supports a variety of driver assistance technologies, which enhance the driving experience and provide peace of mind for family-oriented buyers.

Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Interior Space and Comfort

Space is a critical factor for potential buyers, especially those with families or active lifestyles. The Skoda Fabia offers a commendable trunk capacity of 380 liters, providing adequate storage for daily errands and spontaneous trips. Meanwhile, the T-Cross excels in this category, boasting an impressive trunk capacity of 455 liters, offering even more versatility for transporting goods and gear.

Both cars can comfortably seat five people, ensuring enough room for passengers regardless of the journey length. The elevated stance of the T-Cross allows for better headroom and a more spacious feel, which can be an appealing factor for taller drivers and passengers.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Conclusion: Which One to Choose?

Deciding between the Skoda Fabia and the VW T-Cross boils down to personal preference and specific needs. If you prioritize a compact hatchback with superb fuel efficiency and an agile drive, the Skoda Fabia might be your best bet. However, if an SUV with extra space, a commanding driving position, and stylish design appeals more to your lifestyle, then the VW T-Cross would make a compelling choice.

Both vehicles shine in their respective categories, ensuring that whether you go with the Fabia or the T-Cross, you are choosing a car that embodies innovation, comfort, and performance.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Fabia has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16900 £, while the VW T-Cross costs 21100 £. That’s a price difference of around 4200 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Fabia manages with 4.90 L and is therefore a bit more efficient than the VW T-Cross with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

Both models deliver identical power – 150 HP each.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Fabia is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.40 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Fabia performs barely noticeable better – reaching 222 km/h, while the VW T-Cross tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 22 km/h.

Both models offer the same torque – 250 Nm.

Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Fabia is a bit lighter – 1143 kg compared to 1267 kg. The difference is around 124 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW T-Cross offers somewhat more room – 455 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 75 L.

In maximum load capacity, the VW T-Cross performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1281 L, which is about 91 L more than the Skoda Fabia.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Cross barely noticeable takes the win – 480 kg compared to 437 kg. That’s a difference of about 43 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Fabia shows itself to be has the upper hand and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £16,900
Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Fabia

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 80 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.3 L
details

Skoda Fabia

The Skoda Fabia presents itself as a practical and stylish hatchback, perfect for urban driving and beyond. Its interior is designed with comfort and functionality in mind, offering ample space and intuitive controls. With a focus on efficiency, the Fabia provides a smooth driving experience, complemented by its crisp and modern exterior design.

details
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116050 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116049 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116061 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Der neue SKODA FABIA Detail_116013 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Der neue SKODA FABIA Interieur_115896 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

VW T-Cross

4 (1)
rate

The VW T-Cross turns everyday practicality into a style statement, offering a roomy-feeling cabin, clever storage and playful design that suits town life and family duties alike. On the road it's composed and relaxed, rewarding buyers who want the raised seating and confident presence of an SUV without the weighty compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU01109_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU01111_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU01114_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU01120_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2021AU01124_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Top Car Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Fabia
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Scala
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Scala, buyers are treated to two distinct flavors of practicality and style. The Fabia excels as a compact hatchback with a nimble design and generous cargo space, making it ideal for city driving. Meanwhile, the Scala stands out with its …
@ Citroën / Stellantis Media
Citroen C3 Aircross
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Cross
VS
Citroen C3 Aircross and VW T-Cross go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Skoda Fabia
VW T-Cross
Fabia @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Consumption
Price
16900 - 26000 £
Price
21100 - 31500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.3 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
112 - 119 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
Fuel tank capacity
40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1143 - 1261 kg
Curb weight
1267 - 1338 kg
Trunk capacity
380 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
4108 - 4125 mm
Length
4127 mm
Width
1780 mm
Width
1784 mm
Height
1459 - 1461 mm
Height
1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1190 L
Max trunk capacity
1281 L
Payload
414 - 437 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
80 - 150 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 15.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
175 - 222 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 200 km/h
Torque
93 - 250 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
59 - 110 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Skoda
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Skoda Kamiq and VW T-Cross stand out with their distinctive styles and practicality. While both models share the same platform, the Kamiq offers a slightly more spacious interior, making it an excellent choice for families. On the other hand, the …
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Ibiza
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the SEAT Ibiza showcases its sporty design and agile handling, making it a favorite for urban drivers seeking a bit of flair during their daily commute. Meanwhile, the Skoda Fabia impresses with its practicality and generous interior space, offering a more …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Fabia
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the latest showdown between the Skoda Fabia and the Skoda Kamiq, both models showcase Skoda's commitment to practicality and style. While the Fabia excels with its compact design and agile handling, making it ideal for urban environments, the Kamiq offers a more rugged stature and higher ride …
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the SEAT Arona stands out with its sportier design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to buyers looking for a fun-to-drive option. On the other hand, the Skoda Fabia offers a more practical approach, boasting a spacious interior and impressive boot …
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the SEAT Arona and VW T-Cross offer distinct personalities while sharing a similar platform. The Arona embodies a sporty spirit with its dynamic styling and vibrant color options, appealing to a younger audience, while the T-Cross emphasizes practicality …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both …
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Mokka
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Opel Mokka and VW T-Cross stand out with their distinct styles and features. The Mokka impresses with its bold design and cutting-edge technology, while the T-Cross offers a more practical interior and a comfortable driving experience. Ultimately, …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Clio
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the ongoing battle of compact hatchbacks, the Renault Clio and Skoda Fabia have both staked their claim for supremacy. The Clio boasts a stylish design and a reputation for comfort, often appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and innovative tech in their daily drive. Meanwhile, the Fabia …
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Fabia have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.