Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Subaru Forester vs Land Rover Range Rover - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (136 HP vs 615 HP), boot space and price (34700 £ vs 122700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Subaru Forester or Land Rover Range Rover?
Forester
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Subaru Forester has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34700 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 122700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 88037 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover manages with 2.70 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Subaru Forester with 8.10 L. The difference is about 5.40 L per 100 km.
Range Rover
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover has a significantly edge – offering 615 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 479 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.50 s, while the Subaru Forester takes 12.20 s. That’s about 7.70 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover pulls decisively stronger with 800 Nm compared to 182 Nm. That’s about 618 Nm difference.
Forester
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Subaru Forester is decisively lighter – 1693 kg compared to 2504 kg. The difference is around 811 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers noticeable more room – 818 L compared to 508 L. That’s a difference of about 310 L.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover convincingly takes the win – 846 kg compared to 492 kg. That’s a difference of about 354 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Range Rover sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Subaru Forester
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £122,700
Land Rover Range Rover
Subaru Forester
4 (1 Reviews)
The Subaru Forester is a practical all-rounder that quietly does everything right, with roomy comfort, excellent visibility and a real fondness for weekend adventures off the beaten path. It won't set your pulse racing like a sports car, but for buyers who prize reliability, safety and sensible charm, it's a brilliantly steady companion with a cheeky streak.
details
Land Rover Range Rover
The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.
details
Subaru Forester
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34700 - 42200 £
|
Price
122700 - 244700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
8.10 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
116 - 117 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
183 g/km
|
co2
62 - 265 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1693 - 1739 kg
|
Curb weight
2504 - 2810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
508 L
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1830 mm
|
Width
2047 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
446 - 492 kg
|
Payload
589 - 846 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 HP
|
Power HP
300 - 615 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.20 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
182 Nm
|
Torque
650 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
100 kW
|
Power kW
221 - 452 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1995 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2997 - 4395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
|
Brand
Subaru
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drivetrain options does the Subaru Forester have?
The Subaru Forester is available as All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.