What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Skoda Kodiaq?

Depending on the version, the Skoda Kodiaq delivers up to 265 HP.

What is the fuel consumption of the Skoda Kodiaq according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.40 L.

What is the Skoda Kodiaq’s maximum WLTP range?

According to WLTP, the Skoda Kodiaq can travel up to 123 km on a single charge.

How large is the Skoda Kodiaq’s battery?

The battery capacity is 19.70 kWh.

What is the top speed of the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq reaches up to 231 km/h.

How big is the Skoda Kodiaq overall?

Length 4758 mm, width 1864 mm, height 1679 mm – those are the dimensions of the Skoda Kodiaq.

What drivetrain options does the Subaru Forester have?

The Subaru Forester is available as All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Subaru Forester deliver on the road?

Up to 136 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Subaru Forester use?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 8.10 L.

What is the top speed of the Subaru Forester?

Depending on the model, top speed is 188 km/h.

What are the Subaru Forester’s length, width and height?

Length 4670 mm, width 1830 mm, height 1730 mm – those are the dimensions of the Subaru Forester.

Skoda Kodiaq vs Subaru Forester – Which model proves itself in everyday driving? Specs, differences & prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Subaru Forester has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34700 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 2143 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Subaru Forester with 8.10 L. The difference is about 7.70 L per 100 km.

Forester @ Subaru Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a significantly edge – offering 265 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 129 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Subaru Forester takes 12.20 s. That’s about 5.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs to a small extent better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Subaru Forester tops out at 188 km/h. The difference is around 43 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls significantly stronger with 400 Nm compared to 182 Nm. That’s about 218 Nm difference.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is hardly perceptible lighter – 1684 kg compared to 1693 kg. The difference is around 9 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers significantly more room – 910 L compared to 508 L. That’s a difference of about 402 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs somewhat better – up to 2105 L, which is about 374 L more than the Subaru Forester.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq somewhat takes the win – 563 kg compared to 492 kg. That’s a difference of about 71 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Subaru Forester

4 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

CUPRA Terramar

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

VS

The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

@ Dacia / Renault Group Media

Dacia Bigster

VS

The Skoda Kodiaq is the sensible grown-up: roomy, cleverly packaged and quietly refined for family life, while the Dacia Bigster bangs the value drum — massive interior and tough price tag, but fewer niceties. Choose the Kodiaq for long-term polish and smarter detailing; pick the Bigster if you …

Costs and Consumption
Price 36800 - 49600 £	Price 34700 - 42200 £
Consumption L/100km 0.4 - 8.2 L	Consumption L/100km 8.10 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 113 - 123 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 19.70 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 9 - 186 g/km	co2 183 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 45 - 58 L	Fuel tank capacity 48 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1684 - 1970 kg	Curb weight 1693 - 1739 kg
Trunk capacity 745 - 910 L	Trunk capacity 508 L
Length 4758 - 4761 mm	Length 4670 mm
Width 1864 mm	Width 1830 mm
Height 1663 - 1683 mm	Height 1730 mm
Max trunk capacity 1945 - 2105 L	Max trunk capacity 1679 - 1731 L
Payload 460 - 563 kg	Payload 446 - 492 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel	Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail CVT
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 150 - 265 HP	Power HP 136 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.3 - 9.7 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 12.20 s
Max Speed 205 - 231 km/h	Max Speed 188 km/h
Torque 250 - 400 Nm	Torque 182 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 110 - 195 kW	Power kW 100 kW
Engine capacity 1498 - 1984 cm3	Engine capacity 1995 cm3