Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs Subaru Forester – Performance, range & efficiency compared
Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Subaru Forester?
CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Subaru Forester has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34700 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 7200 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Subaru Forester with 8.10 L. The difference is about 6.70 L per 100 km.
Forester
@ Subaru Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a decisively edge – offering 327 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 191 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Subaru Forester takes 12.20 s. That’s about 6.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs slightly better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Subaru Forester tops out at 188 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls clearly stronger with 550 Nm compared to 182 Nm. That’s about 368 Nm difference.
CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Subaru Forester is a bit lighter – 1693 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 197 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers a bit more room – 570 L compared to 508 L. That’s a difference of about 62 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Subaru Forester performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1731 L, which is about 5 L more than the Mazda CX-60.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 a bit takes the win – 612 kg compared to 492 kg. That’s a difference of about 120 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Mazda CX-60 proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £41,900
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Subaru Forester
The Subaru Forester is a versatile SUV known for its impressive off-road capabilities and practical design. With a spacious interior and advanced safety features, it offers comfort and security for both city driving and outdoor adventures. Its reliable performance and all-wheel-drive system make it a popular choice among those who appreciate a combination of functionality and rugged charm.
details
@ Subaru Corporation
@ Subaru Corporation
@ Subaru Corporation
@ Subaru Corporation
@ Subaru Corporation
Mazda CX-60
Subaru Forester
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Subaru Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41900 - 56800 £
|
Price
34700 - 42200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
8.10 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
31 - 139 g/km
|
co2
183 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
|
Curb weight
1693 - 1739 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
508 L
|
|
Length
4745 mm
|
Length
4670 mm
|
|
Width
1890 mm
|
Width
1830 mm
|
|
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
|
Height
1730 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1679 - 1731 L
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
446 - 492 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
136 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.20 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
|
Max Speed
188 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
182 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
100 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1995 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Subaru
|
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?
The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.