VS

Suzuki Swace vs Land Rover Range Rover comparison

Compare performance (140 HP vs 550 HP), boot space and price (31,900 £ vs 125,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Swace or Land Rover Range Rover?

Suzuki Swace vs Land Rover Range Rover: Key differences

Suzuki Swace

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

Land Rover Range Rover

3.3 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Swace

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Suzuki Swace is considerably cheaper – starting at 31,900 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 125,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 93,351 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover uses 2.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Suzuki Swace with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.

Range Rover

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover offers clearly more power – delivering 550 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 410 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Suzuki Swace takes 9.4 s. That’s about 4.8 s quicker.

Swace

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swace is considerably lighter – 1,475 kg compared to 2,504 kg. The difference is around 1,029 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers visibly more boot space – 818 L compared to 596 L. That’s a difference of about 222 L.

When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover carries clearly more – 846 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 486 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Land Rover Range Rover is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £125,200
Range Rover

Land Rover Range Rover

  • Engine Type Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plug-in Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 300 - 550 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 115 - 116 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
The Suzuki Swace and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports are closely related compact estate cars that combine hybrid efficiency with practical, family-friendly space. This comparison focuses on how the Swace and the Corolla Touring Sports differ in styling, equipment, driving feel and running costs …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
Think of this as a family-friendly duel: the Suzuki Swace, a sensible, value-focused take on Toyota’s proven hybrid estate, versus the Toyota Corolla, the familiar all-rounder that’s been refining the formula for years. Which one gives you smarter value, a more engaging drive and lower running …
Suzuki Swace
Land Rover Range Rover

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Suzuki Swace

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Sjors
16 Apr 2026, 11:06:18

I have the Swace — it drives much more frugally than you state: 1:23. A downside as you get older is that getting in, and especially getting out, becomes harder because of the low seating position. The advantage of the low seat is better fuel economy. 16‑inch wheels are also likely to be more economical than larger ones. Rear legroom is poor. It would be nice if the rear bench were on rails like the Renault Twingo. Shrinking the boot would give more rear legroom. The 2014 Toyota Prius was the last to offer lots of rear legroom — after that it’s been rubbish.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Land Rover Range Rover

The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.

details
Range_Rover_Belgravia_Green_D350_Autobiography_8864
Range_Rover_Batumi_Gold_D350_First_Edition_7354
Range_Rover_Belgravia_Green_D350_Autobiography_7927
Range_Rover_Interiors_8452

Reviews Land Rover Range Rover

3.3 (1 Reviews)
rate
IVAN
13 May 2026, 22:08:33

Aesthetic presence but in today's world only a good hybrid or full electric should be offer..

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q6 e-tron
Land Rover Range Rover
VS
The Audi Q6 e-tron and Land Rover Range Rover compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Land Rover Range Rover
Aston Martin DBX
VS
The Land Rover Range Rover and Aston Martin DBX compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Land Rover Range Rover
Jaecoo 7
VS
The Land Rover Range Rover and Jaecoo 7 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Dacia Spring
Land Rover Range Rover
VS
Dacia Spring and Land Rover Range Rover go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Jaguar F-Pace
Land Rover Range Rover
VS
In the luxury SUV realm, the Jaguar F-Pace and the Land Rover Range Rover both stand out with their own strengths. The F-Pace, with its sporty handling and sleek design, appeals to those looking for a performance-driven edge alongside luxury. Meanwhile, the Range Rover, known for its off-road …
Land Rover Defender
Land Rover Range Rover
VS
Unsure whether the Land Rover Defender or the Land Rover Range Rover is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Ford Ranger
Land Rover Range Rover
VS
The Ford Ranger and Land Rover Range Rover compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé
Land Rover Range Rover
VS
Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé and Land Rover Range Rover go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Suzuki Swace
Land Rover Range Rover

Costs and Consumption
Price
31,900 £
Price
125,200 - 275,200 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
115 - 116 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
102 g/km
co2
62 - 267 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,475 kg
Curb weight
2,504 - 2,810 kg
Trunk capacity
596 L
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
Length
4,655 mm
Length
-
Width
1,790 mm
Width
2,047 mm
Height
1,460 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
360 kg
Payload
645 - 846 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plug-in Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 HP
Power HP
300 - 550 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 6.6 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Power kW
103 kW
Power kW
221 - 405 kW
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Suzuki
Brand
Land Rover
Is the Suzuki Swace offered with different drivetrains?

The Suzuki Swace is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.