VS

Suzuki Swift vs Mitsubishi Space Star comparison

Compare performance (82 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Swift or Mitsubishi Space Star?

Suzuki Swift vs Mitsubishi Space Star: Key differences

Suzuki Swift

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • moderately more trunk space

Mitsubishi Space Star

  • substantially cheaper
  • moderately lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Swift

In the competitive landscape of compact hatchbacks, the Mitsubishi Space Star and Suzuki Swift stand out for their unique blend of styling, economy, and performance. These two vehicles are popular choices for urban dwellers seeking practicality without sacrificing driving pleasure. In this article, we will perform a detailed comparison of the Mitsubishi Space Star and the Suzuki Swift, examining their technical specifications, innovations, and overall efficiency.

Space Star

Design and Dimensions

Both the Mitsubishi Space Star and Suzuki Swift offer compact dimensions making them great for navigating city streets and fitting into tight parking spots. The Space Star measures 3845 mm in length, 1665 mm in width, and 1505 mm in height, providing a lightweight curb weight starting from 940 kg. On the other hand, the Swift, slightly longer at 3860 mm with a width of 1735 mm, offers a taller profile with heights ranging from 1485 mm to 1510 mm and a heavier curb weight from 1069 kg to 1145 kg. This makes the Swift marginally bulkier, though it does enhance the feeling of stability on the road.

Swift

Powertrains and Performance

The Mitsubishi Space Star is powered by a 1.2L three-cylinder petrol engine that produces a modest 71 HP and 102 Nm of torque, available with both manual and CVT automatic transmissions. It is designed primarily for efficiency, with fuel consumption ratings ranging from 4.9 to 5.5 L/100 km and a CO2 output of between 112 and 125 g/km. It can achieve a top speed of 167 km/h and takes around 14.1 seconds to reach 100 km/h.

In contrast, the Suzuki Swift features a slightly more powerful 1.2L MHEV (mild hybrid electric vehicle) engine, delivering 82 HP and 112 Nm of torque, also available with manual and automatic options. It excels in fuel efficiency, with consumption figures as low as 4.4 L/100 km, and CO2 emissions ranging from 98 to 110 g/km. The Swift can reach a maximum speed of 170 km/h and accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 12.5 seconds, making it the quicker option of the two.

Space Star

Interior and Cargo Capacity

Inside, both models are equipped to comfortably accommodate five passengers. The Space Star offers a trunk capacity of 235 L, which can be beneficial for everyday grocery runs or short trips. The Swift, however, leads in this category, offering a larger trunk space of 265 L, making it more versatile for customers needing that additional room.

As for technology and features, both vehicles come with a range of modern infotainment systems, connectivity options, and safety features. The Swift, being a slight newer model, may offer more contemporary tech innovations, particularly in terms of onboard safety systems, like advanced driver assistance and integration with smartphones.

Swift

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

When it comes to ecological considerations, the Swift takes a step ahead, primarily due to its mild hybrid technology, which helps to lower its carbon footprint and enhance fuel efficiency. The Space Star, while still efficient, especially compared to many larger vehicles, exhibits slightly higher emissions and fuel consumption figures.

Space Star

Conclusion: Which One to Choose?

In summation, both the Mitsubishi Space Star and the Suzuki Swift deliver solid performance and practicality for those seeking a compact hatchback. If fuel efficiency and advanced hybrid technology are your main priorities, the Suzuki Swift shines as the winner. However, if you're looking for a more budget-friendly option that still promises reliability and adequate performance for city driving, the Mitsubishi Space Star is worthy of consideration. Ultimately, the choice between these two models boils down to individual preferences regarding performance, space, and eco-friendliness.

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swift
Toyota Aygo
VS
If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …
Suzuki Ignis
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Suzuki Ignis is the cheeky mini‑crossover — tall, practical and rugged enough to shrug off potholes and a weekend’s worth of kit — while the Suzuki Swift is the sprightly hatch that rewards sharper steering, brisk responses and a more engaging drive. Choose the Ignis for visibility, space and …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Swift

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Space Star is substantially cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Suzuki Swift costs 17,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,494 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Swift uses 4.4 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Mitsubishi Space Star with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.

Space Star

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Swift offers somewhat more power – delivering 82 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 11 HP more horsepower.

Looking at top speed, the Suzuki Swift is marginally faster – reaching 170 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Space Star tops out at 167 km/h. The difference is around 3 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki Swift delivers marginally more torque with 112 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

Swift

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is moderately lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,069 kg. The difference is around 129 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Swift offers moderately more boot space – 265 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Suzuki Swift offers barely more capacity – up to 980 L, about 68 L more than the Mitsubishi Space Star.

When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi Space Star carries clearly more – 400 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 104 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Suzuki Swift is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Swift

Suzuki Swift

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 82 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
details
Suzuki Swift
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Suzuki Swift

The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.

details
SUZUKI-519
SUZUKI SWIFT-678
SUZUKI SWIFT-954
SUZUKI-058
SUZUKI SWIFT-672
Swift_3

Reviews Suzuki Swift

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
Kris
9 Apr 2026, 18:26:38

Superb quality, fun to drive, and every bit of well layed out kit you'll ever need.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
DSC_2683_low
DSC_6272_low
DSC_8755_low
050_low

Reviews Mitsubishi Space Star

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swift
Toyota Yaris
VS
Ring the bell for a city‑car showdown: the feisty Suzuki Swift takes on the ever‑practical Toyota Yaris. The Swift flirts with sporty handling and cheeky styling, while the Yaris trades pizzazz for polished build, frugal engines (including a sensible hybrid) and the kind of reliability that keeps …
Honda Jazz
Suzuki Swift
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Honda Jazz and Suzuki Swift stand out for their unique blend of style and practicality. The Jazz boasts a versatile interior with its innovative Magic Seats, allowing for exceptional cargo flexibility, while the Swift captivates with its sporty design and …
Hyundai i10
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Hyundai i10 is the sensible city slicker — compact, surprisingly roomy for its size, cheap to run and designed to make parking a confidence exercise rather than a stressful workout. The Suzuki Swift is the cheeky, slightly sportier option with sharper handling and bolder looks, so pick it if …
Kia Picanto
Suzuki Swift
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Kia Picanto and Suzuki Swift stand out with their unique blends of style and practicality. The Picanto offers a more spacious interior with user-friendly tech features, making it an excellent option for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the Swift impresses with …
Suzuki Swift
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki Swift and Suzuki Vitara compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Citroen C3
Suzuki Swift
VS
In the competitive world of compact cars, the Citroën C3 and Suzuki Swift both offer distinct advantages catering to different driving preferences. The Citroën C3 impresses with its unique, stylish design and comfortable ride, making it a great choice for urban environments. Meanwhile, the Suzuki …
Dacia Sandero
Suzuki Swift
VS
In the battle of budget-friendly hatchbacks, the Dacia Sandero emerges as a spacious and practical choice, offering impressive value for money with its versatile interior and economical engines. Meanwhile, the Suzuki Swift brings a sportier flair to the segment, boasting agile handling and a peppy …
Peugeot 208
Suzuki Swift
VS
In the battle of the compact hatchbacks, the Peugeot 208 offers a stylish design and a tech-forward interior, making it a popular choice for urban drivers. In contrast, the Suzuki Swift distinguishes itself with its punchy performance and exceptional fuel efficiency, appealing to those who value …
Suzuki Swift
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
98 - 110 g/km
co2
112 - 125 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
37 L
Fuel tank capacity
35 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Trunk capacity
265 L
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Length
3,860 mm
Length
3,845 mm
Width
1,735 mm
Width
1,665 mm
Height
1,485 - 1,510 mm
Height
1,505 mm
Max trunk capacity
980 L
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Payload
282 - 296 kg
Payload
359 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
82 HP
Power HP
71 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Torque
112 Nm
Torque
102 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
61 kW
Power kW
52 kW
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Suzuki
Brand
Mitsubishi
Is the Suzuki Swift offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.