Compare performance (150 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (31,600 £ vs 28,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota Proace Transporter or Mercedes Vito Transporter?
In the highly competitive world of cargo vans, the Mercedes Vito Transporter and the Toyota Proace Transporter both stand out with their distinctive qualities. With the 2024 models on the market, it's time to delve deep into a comparison that caters to both business needs and technological advancements.
The Mercedes Vito Transporter offers a wide range of engine options, including both diesel and electric variants with power outputs ranging from 102 HP to a hefty 237 HP. This is complemented by a diverse range of drive types: Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, and All-Wheel Drive, allowing for customizable driving experiences.
On the other hand, the Toyota Proace Transporter provides a selection of diesel and electric engines, with power options between 120 HP and 144 HP. Its consistent Front-Wheel Drive simplifies the driving dynamics, which is beneficial for those who prefer uniform handling experiences.
When it comes to fuel economy, the Mercedes Vito posts consumption rates between 6.8 and 7.9 L/100km for diesel and 20.7 to 21.1 kWh/100km for electric variants. The electric range of the Vito extends up to 313 km, backed by a 60 kWh battery capacity.
The Proace stands out with slightly more conservative consumption rates, ranging from 6.6 to 7.6 L/100km for diesel. However, it claims a longer electric range, reaching up to 349 km, albeit with a slightly higher consumption rate of 23.8 to 23.9 kWh/100km.
Payload capacity is a critical factor in the cargo van market. The Mercedes Vito boasts a payload range from 849 kg to 1000 kg, suiting varying loads and business needs. In comparison, the Toyota Proace is a muscular contender with capacities from 955 kg up to a robust 1496 kg, making it ideal for those who routinely haul heavier goods.
Both vans exhibit distinctive size profiles. The Mercedes Vito ranges in length from 4895 mm to 5370 mm, a width of 1928 mm, and a height variance between 1910 mm and 1945 mm. Curb weight spans from 1800 kg to 2347 kg, depending on configurations.
Meanwhile, the Toyota Proace extends in length from 4980 mm to 5330 mm, a width of 1920 mm, and a height ranging between 1895 mm to 1935 mm. Its weight varies from 1604 kg to 2100 kg, showing a lighter overall profile for urban maneuverability.
The Mercedes Vito boasts advanced customization with its variety of drive types and transmission choices—including Manual, Automatic, and Reduction Gearbox options. These features mark it as a versatile player in reaching a wide sector of commercial purposes.
With regards to innovations, the Toyota Proace captivates with its payload capacity and efficient electric range, presenting an option that bridges the gap between eco-efficiency and heavy-duty capability. Advanced transmission options also enhance its driving quality.
Both the Mercedes Vito and Toyota Proace present exceptional qualities that cater to specific business requirements. While the Vito impresses with performance versatility and extensive configuration options, the Proace delivers robust payload capacity and impressive electric range efficiency. The ultimate choice hinges on your unique demands, whether they prioritize power, versatility, or payload capacity.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mercedes Vito Transporter is only slightly cheaper – starting at 28,800 £ , while the Toyota Proace Transporter costs 31,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,853 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota Proace Transporter uses 6.4 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes Vito Transporter is somewhat more efficient: consuming 21.2 kWh/100km compared to 23.8 kWh/100km for the Toyota Proace Transporter. That’s a difference of about 2.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes Vito Transporter offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 474 km, about 125 km more than the Toyota Proace Transporter.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Vito Transporter offers markedly more power – delivering 237 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 87 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Vito Transporter delivers visibly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 370 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Toyota Proace Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota Proace Transporter is a bit lighter – 1,656 kg compared to 1,916 kg. The difference is around 260 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota Proace Transporter carries visibly more – 1,323 kg compared to 884 kg. That’s a difference of about 439 kg.
The Mercedes Vito Transporter is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Toyota Proace Transporter is a no-nonsense work van that pairs Toyota’s dependable reputation with smart practicality, so you can load, drive and finish the job without unnecessary drama. It won’t win design awards, but with a comfortable cab, sensible feature set and a focus on getting things done, it quietly keeps fleets and small businesses smiling.
details
The Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
31,600 - 51,000 £
|
Price
28,800 - 51,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.4 - 6.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23.8 - 23.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
349 km
|
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 177 g/km
|
co2
0 - 222 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,656 - 2,100 kg
|
Curb weight
1,916 - 2,518 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,895 - 5,390 mm
|
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,910 - 1,945 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 6,600 L
|
|
Payload
955 - 1,323 kg
|
Payload
547 - 884 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
120 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
|
|
Torque
260 - 370 Nm
|
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
88 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, A, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España