Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Volvo EC40 vs Polestar 2 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (442 HP vs 476 HP), boot space and price (46600 £ vs 42000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EC40 or Polestar 2?
EC40
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Polestar 2 has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 42000 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4629 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Polestar 2: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Volvo EC40 with 16.20 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.40 kWh.
As for electric range, the Polestar 2 performs somewhat better – achieving up to 659 km, about 75 km more than the Volvo EC40.
2
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 2 has a barely noticeable edge – offering 476 HP compared to 442 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 2 is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 4.20 s, while the Volvo EC40 takes 4.60 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Polestar 2 performs to a small extent better – reaching 205 km/h, while the Volvo EC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 25 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Polestar 2 pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 740 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Polestar 2 is slight lighter – 2015 kg compared to 2065 kg. The difference is around 50 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Polestar 2 offers barely noticeable more room – 405 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 1 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo EC40 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1196 L, which is about 101 L more than the Polestar 2.
When it comes to payload, Volvo EC40 hardly perceptible takes the win – 435 kg compared to 421 kg. That’s a difference of about 14 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Polestar 2 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Volvo EC40
Polestar 2
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £42,000
Polestar 2
Volvo EC40
The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.
details
Polestar 2
5 (1 Reviews)
The Polestar 2 is a crisp, Scandinavian-styled electric liftback that pairs minimalist luxury with a focused, driver's attitude. It feels agile and composed whether you’re commuting or heading out for the weekend, with a tech-forward cabin and enough personality to make everyday driving a bit more fun.
details
Volvo EC40
Polestar 2
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
46600 - 59000 £
|
Price
42000 - 57400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.8 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
488 - 584 km
|
Electric Range
554 - 659 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
78 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2065 - 2185 kg
|
Curb weight
2015 - 2188 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
Trunk capacity
405 L
|
|
Length
4440 mm
|
Length
4606 mm
|
|
Width
1873 mm
|
Width
1859 mm
|
|
Height
1591 mm
|
Height
1473 - 1479 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1196 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1095 L
|
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Payload
375 - 421 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
Power HP
272 - 476 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
205 km/h
|
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
Torque
490 - 740 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
Power kW
200 - 350 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
Polestar
|
What drivetrain options does the Volvo EC40 have?
Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.