VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Polestar 2 – Differences & prices compared

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Audi Q4 e-tron or Polestar 2?

Q4 e-tron @ audi-mediacenter.com

The electric vehicle market is rapidly evolving, with compelling options emerging from various manufacturers. Two standout contenders are the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Polestar 2. Both vehicles offer distinctive designs, technological innovations, and impressive performance metrics. Here, we’ll delve into a detailed comparison of the Audi Q4 e-tron and Polestar 2, highlighting their technical aspects and innovations.

2 @ Polestar

Design and Build Quality

The Audi Q4 e-tron, an SUV, boasts a modern, sleek design that encapsulates Audi's signature aesthetic. Measuring 4588 mm in length, 1865 mm in width, and a height of 1632 mm, the Q4 provides an elevated driving position and a spacious interior. It features a trunk capacity of up to 535 liters, making it practical for everyday use.

In contrast, the Polestar 2 presents a sporty hatchback design that is both aggressive and elegant. Stretching 4606 mm in length, with a width of 1859 mm and a height of 1479 mm, it offers a lower profile compared to the Q4. However, with a trunk capacity of 405 liters, it sacrifices some storage space for its athletic stance.

Q4 e-tron @ audi-mediacenter.com

Powertrains and Performance

The Audi Q4 e-tron offers a range of electric powertrains, including rear-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations. Its power output varies from 170 HP to a potent 340 HP, with torque numbers peaking at 545 Nm. The Q4's 0-100 km/h acceleration ranges from a respectable 9 seconds in the base model to an impressive 5.4 seconds in the top-end version.

On the other hand, the Polestar 2 shines with its powerful electric motors, yielding up to 476 HP in its most powerful variant. It accelerates from 0-100 km/h in just 4.2 seconds, showcasing remarkable performance. Torque figures reach up to 740 Nm, positioning the Polestar 2 as a performance-oriented alternative to the Q4.

2 @ Polestar

Energy Efficiency and Range

When it comes to energy consumption, the Audi Q4 e-tron shows an impressive range of 351 to 554 km, depending on the variant and battery capacity of 52 kWh to 77 kWh. Its energy consumption hovers between 15.9 and 17.4 kWh/100 km, reflecting efficiency as a priority in its design.

The Polestar 2, with a single battery capacity of 78 kWh, offers an impressive electric range of 554 to 659 km and the lowest consumption figures, with a remarkable 14.7 kWh/100 km in its most efficient trim. This makes the Polestar 2 a standout in terms of long-distance potential and sustainability.

Q4 e-tron @ audi-mediacenter.com

Technological Features

Both vehicles come equipped with cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. The Audi Q4 e-tron features the MMI infotainment system with a 10.1-inch touchscreen and a fully digital instrument cluster, offering intuitive controls and connectivity options. It includes advanced driver-assistance systems that enhance safety and drive comfort.

Similarly, the Polestar 2 incorporates a Google-based infotainment system, featuring a 12.3-inch touchscreen that integrates seamlessly with Google services for navigation, music, and more. Additionally, the Polestar’s focus on sustainability is evident in its use of recycled materials in the interior and advanced software updates over-the-air.

2 @ Polestar

Conclusion: Which One to Choose?

In summary, the Audi Q4 e-tron excels with its spacious SUV design, effective use of interior space, and premium build quality, making it a practical choice for families and everyday users. Meanwhile, the Polestar 2 emphasizes performance, efficiency, and innovative technology, appealing to those who prioritize speed and cutting-edge features in their electric vehicle.

Ultimately, your choice between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Polestar 2 should be guided by your personal priorities—be it space and comfort or performance and technological sophistication. Both vehicles represent the future of sustainable driving, and they showcase the diverse offerings in the electric vehicle market.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron @ audi-mediacenter.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Audi Q4 e-tron has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 39600 £, while the Polestar 2 costs 42000 £. That’s a price difference of around 2434 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Polestar 2: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the Audi Q4 e-tron with 15.90 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.10 kWh.

As for range, the Polestar 2 performs a bit better – achieving up to 659 km, about 105 km more than the Audi Q4 e-tron.

2 @ Polestar

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 2 has a distinct edge – offering 476 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 136 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 2 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 4.20 s, while the Audi Q4 e-tron takes 5.40 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Polestar 2 performs a bit better – reaching 205 km/h, while the Audi Q4 e-tron tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 25 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Polestar 2 pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 740 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 61 Nm difference.

Q4 e-tron @ audi-mediacenter.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Polestar 2 is slight lighter – 2015 kg compared to 2035 kg. The difference is around 20 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers distinct more room – 535 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 130 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Audi Q4 e-tron performs evident better – up to 1490 L, which is about 395 L more than the Polestar 2.

When it comes to payload, Audi Q4 e-tron somewhat takes the win – 515 kg compared to 421 kg. That’s a difference of about 94 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Polestar 2 proves to be wins solidly and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Polestar 2 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £42,000
663194_20230124_Polestar_2_MY24

Polestar 2

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 272 - 476 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.8 kWh
  • Electric Range : 554 - 659 km
details

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron seamlessly combines sustainable driving with premium comfort, embodying the brand's commitment to electric mobility. Its sleek design and spacious interior create an inviting atmosphere, perfect for those who appreciate both style and practicality. With a focus on innovative technology, the Q4 e-tron offers a dynamic driving experience that appeals to modern drivers seeking eco-friendly alternatives.

details
A213272_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A213273_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A213248_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A213261_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A213263_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A213264_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com

Polestar 2

5 (1)
rate

Der Polestar 2 beeindruckt mit seinem klaren, skandinavischen Design und einer hochwertigen Verarbeitung, die sowohl innen als auch außen zu sehen ist. Besonders auffallend ist das futuristische Cockpit mit einem innovativen Infotainment-System, das auf Android basiert und nahtlose Konnektivität bietet. Zusätzlich bietet das Modell ein exzellentes Fahrgefühl mit dynamischen Fahreigenschaften, das selbst anspruchsvolle Fahrer begeistert.

details
663194_20230124_Polestar_2_MY24 @ Polestar
652865_20220602_Polestar_2_BST_edition_270 @ Polestar
663199_20230124_Polestar_2_MY24 @ Polestar
651029_20220427_Polestar_2 @ Polestar

Similar Comparisons

Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron is the tidy, city-smart EV that slips into tight parking spots, delivers sensible range and a friendly price, while the Audi Q6 e-tron turns up the luxury, space and tech — essentially a grown-up Q4 with more ambition and a bigger bill. Choose the Q4 for efficient, no-nonsense daily driving; pick the Q6 if you want flagship comfort, cutting-edge features and don’t mind paying extra for the premium experience.
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
In the compact EV SUV showdown, the Audi Q4 e‑tron leans into classy understatement with a roomier, more refined interior and a smoother, long-distance friendly ride. The BMW iX1, meanwhile, trades some comfort for sportier handling and a livelier, driver-focused feel—pick the Q4 for comfort and polish, the iX1 if you want more fun behind the wheel.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Polestar 2
Q4 e-tron
2

Costs and Consumption
Price
39600 - 58800 £
Price
42000 - 57400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.4 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.8 kWh
Electric Range
406 - 554 km
Electric Range
554 - 659 km
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
Battery Capacity
78 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2035 - 2235 kg
Curb weight
2015 - 2188 kg
Trunk capacity
520 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
405 L
Length
4588 mm
Length
4606 mm
Width
1865 mm
Width
1859 mm
Height
1614 - 1632 mm
Height
1473 - 1479 mm
Max trunk capacity
1460 - 1490 L
Max trunk capacity
1095 L
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
375 - 421 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
272 - 476 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.4 s
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
Max Speed
205 km/h
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
Torque
490 - 740 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
200 - 350 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2023 - 2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Polestar

Similar Comparisons

Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX3
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX3 stand out with their distinct design philosophies and advanced technologies. The Q4 e-tron impresses with its spacious interior and cutting-edge infotainment system, while the iX3 offers a more traditional BMW driving experience with its dynamic handling and electric performance. Both vehicles cater to eco-conscious consumers, but potential buyers will need to weigh factors like range, charging capabilities, and personal style preferences before making a decision.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
In the rapidly evolving electric vehicle landscape, the Audi Q4 e-tron stands out with its sleek design and impressive performance, offering a refined driving experience infused with premium features. Conversely, the Volvo EX40 champions safety and practicality, boasting a minimalist interior paired with advanced technological integrations. Both models cater to environmentally conscious consumers, yet they each bring a distinct personality to the growing EV market, making the choice between them a matter of personal preference and lifestyle needs.
Audi Q4 e-tron
CUPRA Tavascan
VS
In the growing electric SUV segment, the Audi Q4 e-tron and CUPRA Tavascan emerge as strong contenders, each offering unique features and driving experiences. The Q4 e-tron impresses with its premium interior quality and cutting-edge technology, while the Tavascan stands out for its sporty design and dynamic performance. Ultimately, the choice between these two models may come down to personal preference, as both vehicles represent the future of electrified mobility.
Volvo EX40
Polestar 2
VS
In the burgeoning world of electric vehicles, the Volvo EX30 and the Polestar 2 stand as compelling choices for eco-conscious drivers. The EX30, with its Scandinavian minimalist design, offers a robust suite of safety features alongside a compact build ideal for city driving. In contrast, the Polestar 2 impresses with its premium performance, delivering a faster ride and a muscular aesthetic, making it a strong contender for those prioritizing dynamic driving experiences.
Polestar 2
Polestar 4
VS
The Polestar 2 and Polestar 4 represent the Swedish brand's commitment to performance and sustainability, but they cater to different driving preferences. While the Polestar 2 offers a sporty hatchback experience with agile handling and a spacious interior, the Polestar 4 leans towards a more SUV-like stance, providing added versatility and cargo space. Both models showcase Polestar's cutting-edge technology and distinctive design, making them compelling options for eco-conscious drivers seeking style and performance.
Audi Q3
Audi Q4 e-tron
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact luxury SUVs, the Audi Q3 and Audi Q4 e-tron present distinct offerings tailored to different preferences. The Q3 impresses with its spirited performance and traditional gasoline engine, while the Q4 e-tron showcases Audi's commitment to electrification with a versatile EV platform. Ultimately, the choice between the two models hinges on whether drivers prioritize the engaging drive of a combustion engine or the sustainability and innovation of an electric vehicle.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Mercedes EQB
VS
In the competitive electric SUV market, the Audi Q4 e-tron and Mercedes EQB stand out with their distinct design languages and cutting-edge technology. The Q4 e-tron offers a more performance-oriented driving experience and a sleek, modern interior, while the EQB shines with its practicality and spacious three-row seating option. Ultimately, choosing between these two models will depend on individual preferences for style, functionality, and driving dynamics.
Audi Q4 e-tron
VW ID.7
VS
In the competitive electric vehicle landscape, the Audi Q4 e-tron and VW ID.7 stand out for their innovative designs and technology. The Q4 e-tron offers a more upscale interior with premium materials, while the ID.7 focuses on spaciousness and practicality for everyday use. Both models feature impressive range and performance, making them compelling options for eco-conscious drivers seeking style and functionality.
What drive types are available for the Audi Q4 e-tron?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.