VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Volvo EX60 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 54,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Volvo EX60?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Volvo EX60: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • marginally lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

Volvo EX60

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • markedly more electric range
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Q4 e-tron

Overview — Audi Q4 e-tron VS Volvo EX60: who each one really suits

Audi Q4 e-tron and Volvo EX60 sit in the same premium electric-SUV arena, but they aim at different instincts: the Q4 e-tron leans toward familiar Audi calm, usable space and city friendliness, while the Volvo EX60 pushes modern tech, long‑distance ease and a quieter‑than‑usual grand‑tourer vibe. The matchup is less about raw specs and more about trade‑offs — price and simplicity versus reach and charging speed, predictable handling versus plush suspension and gadgetry. If you value straightforward usability and a traditionally premium cockpit, the Audi makes life easy; if you care more about top‑tier charging, a tech‑rich cabin and maximum highway range, the Volvo pulls ahead. This comparison teases out those real‑world differences so you can see which car fits your daily life rather than which one wins a spec sheet.

EX60

Driving character — composed Audi versus laid‑back Volvo muscle

The Audi Q4 e-tron feels like an accessible, composed SUV: steering that rewards steady inputs, a heavy but secure presence and versions that are notably nimble in town when fitted with rear‑wheel drive. The Volvo EX60 presents a more relaxed, cushioned demeanor with stronger thrust on demand — it’s the brisk performer in overtakes and motorway merges and it rewards those who want effortless progress. Where the Q4 underlines predictability and driver confidence, the EX60 trades a bit of agility for an almost sedan‑like serenity and stronger acceleration when you request it. In short, choose the Q4 if you prefer tidy, familiar handling and city composure; pick the EX60 if you want effortless long‑legged performance and a softer, more pillowy ride.

Q4 e-tron

Comfort and long‑distance behavior — two quiet cabins, different approaches

Both the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX60 are built to make long drives pleasant, but the sensory experience diverges: the Q4 focuses on low noise and steady highway manners that let conversation and music come through clearly, while the EX60 couples an unusually hushed interior with adaptive damping that smooths out rough roads. For stop‑and‑go commuting the Q4’s composed chassis and easy controls feel immediately reassuring; for long motorway stages the EX60’s superior charging pace and extended range potential mean fewer, shorter breaks and a more continuous trip. Neither is harsh, but the Audi feels more conservative and planted, the Volvo more like a comfortable flagship that prioritizes serenity over nimble responses. Your choice depends on whether you prize a composed, Audi‑style cruise or maximum comfort and fewer charging interruptions on long runs.

EX60

Cabin feel and usability — tactile Audi logic versus Volvo’s modern, connected calm

The Q4 e-tron’s cabin leans on Audi familiarity: physical climate controls, straightforward menus and an interior that feels arranged around driver ergonomics, though some harder plastics undercut the premium illusion in quieter moments. The EX60 trades that classic layout for a bright, modern interior and deep software integration — Google built‑in, Gemini voice assistance and a curved screen give it a more digital, connected personality, and Volvo keeps useful physical switches where it matters. Visibility and shoulder space differ too: the Audi’s driving position offers clear sightlines but thicker pillars can intrude, while the EX60’s rising window line creates blind spots that you’ll manage with cameras and sensors. In everyday use the Audi feels practical and immediately usable; the Volvo feels more advanced and airy, but asks you to adapt to its tech‑forward ergonomics.

Q4 e-tron

Practicality and everyday usability — family‑friendly Audi vs. tech‑packed Volvo

Both SUVs prioritize rear‑seat comfort with flat floors and generous legroom, but the way they approach everyday chores is different: the Audi Q4 e-tron earns points for a large, usable boot and simple, family‑friendly layout that makes seat belts, child seats and weekly shopping straightforward. The Volvo EX60 pushes practicality with additional storage touches and a front luggage compartment in some versions, plus comprehensive parking aids that compensate for its wider stance. The Audi’s cable storage under the loading floor can be awkward when the boot is full, whereas the Volvo’s camera suite and 360° view make maneuvering less stressful despite its bulk. For tight city garages and frequent parking the Q4’s smaller turning radius and predictable controls feel friendlier, while the EX60 suits families who prioritize cargo flexibility and tech that eases daily logistics.

Buyer fit — who should opt for the Audi Q4 e-tron or the Volvo EX60?

Choose the Audi Q4 e-tron if you want an affordable entry into premium electric motoring with familiar controls, a tidy rear seat for family life and city‑friendly manners that still handle motorway cruising calmly. Pick the Volvo EX60 if your priorities are maximum highway composure, faster high‑power charging and a tech‑heavy interior that makes long trips simpler and more connected. Cost‑aware buyers and people who prize tangible button layout and Audi’s driving feel will gravitate to the Q4; buyers who accept a higher price for greater real‑world range, faster charging and a modern infotainment ecosystem will prefer the EX60. If you want, scroll down to the technical comparison to see how those practical differences map onto battery, charging and performance figures — the numbers will clarify the trade‑offs discussed here.

Frequently compared as well

BMW iX3
Volvo EX60
VS
The BMW iX3 and Volvo EX60 represent two different takes on the compact electric SUV: BMW focuses on driving dynamics and efficiency, while Volvo emphasizes safety, interior comfort and tech. This short comparison will show where each model shines so you can choose which suits your priorities.
Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Comparing the Volvo XC60 and the Volvo EX60 pits a familiar midsize premium SUV against Volvo’s new all-electric contender: the XC60 offers refined petrol and hybrid options while the EX60 focuses on pure-electric range, sharper tech and lower running costs. If you’re choosing between established …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Audi Q4 e-tron is visibly cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the Volvo EX60 costs 54,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,277 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q4 e-tron is only slightly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 14.9 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX60. That’s a difference of about 0.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX60 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 810 km, about 218 km more than the Audi Q4 e-tron.

EX60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX60 offers considerably more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 340 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX60 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Audi Q4 e-tron takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX60 delivers slightly more torque with 790 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 111 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q4 e-tron is marginally lighter – 2,035 kg compared to 2,189 kg. The difference is around 154 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers only slightly more boot space – 535 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 12 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q4 e-tron carries slightly more – 515 kg compared to 461 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,000
EX60

Volvo EX60

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 374 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 611 - 810 km
details
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details
A213272_overfull
A213273_overfull
A213248_overfull
A213261_overfull
A213263_overfull
A213264_overfull

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Alain
10 Jun 2026, 00:16:47

A more attractive vehicle inside and out, with German reliability.

Volvo EX60

The Volvo EX60 is a stylish electric SUV that pairs Scandinavian minimalism with a high-quality, comfortable cabin and an intuitive infotainment experience. It delivers a composed, refined ride with advanced safety and driver-assist systems that make daily driving relaxed and confident.

details
Volvo-EX60
serpimg_XMUALo

Reviews Volvo EX60

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
Willem
16 Jun 2026, 18:00:20

Volvo turns out to be premium compared with KIA. By the way, it's also a fine car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX90
Volvo EX60
VS
The Volvo EX90 and Volvo EX60 are Volvo's all-electric SUVs aimed at different buyers: the EX90 is the flagship full-size model focused on maximum space, safety and cutting-edge tech, while the EX60 is a mid-size alternative that prioritizes efficiency, agility and value. This comparison cuts …
Volvo EX40
Volvo EX60
VS
Volvo’s EX40 and EX60 lock horns in a neatly staged duel: the nimble EX40 is a city-savvy, efficiency-first EV built for tight streets and savvy budgets, while the larger EX60 brings more space, stronger performance and longer range for family life and weekend escapes. Pick this showdown for a …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you …
Polestar 4
Volvo EX60
VS
Polestar 4 and Volvo EX60 go head-to-head in a clash of Scandinavian design, tech and electric muscle — one is a sporty provocateur, the other a polished family flagship. Time to find out which brings the sharper drive, smarter cabin and better real-world value for buyers who want style with …
Volvo EX60
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Comparing the Volvo EX60 and the Mercedes GLC EQ pairs Volvo’s minimalist, safety-first electric SUV with Mercedes’ luxury-focused, tech-rich take on the midsize EV crossover. I'll highlight the key differences in driving dynamics, range, interior quality and running costs so you can choose the one …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
ZEEKR 7X
Volvo EX60
VS
The Zeekr 7X and Volvo EX60 go head-to-head in our compact-luxury EV showdown, pitting China’s tech-forward bravado against Sweden’s calm, safety-first pedigree. We drive them back-to-back to find which delivers more range, refinement and real-world value — and which one you'll actually enjoy …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX60

Costs and Consumption
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
54,000 - 67,500 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
611 - 810 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
2,189 - 2,405 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
523 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,899 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
455 - 461 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
374 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
480 - 790 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
275 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,026 - 2,027
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Volvo
Is the Audi Q4 e-tron offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.