In the burgeoning segment of electric SUVs, the BMW iX2 and Volvo EC40 stand out with their distinct design philosophies and technology offerings. The iX2 impresses with its sporty handling and luxurious interior, making it a dynamic choice for driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the EC40 emphasizes safety and practicality, catering to those seeking a reliable, eco-friendly option without compromising on comfort.
The race for electric supremacy among compact SUVs heats up with two of the most anticipated models of 2024: the BMW iX2 and the Volvo EC40. Both vehicles showcase the latest innovations in electric mobility, but which one stands out in terms of performance, technology, and overall experience? Let’s dive into the details of each model.
When it comes to power, the BMW iX2 offers two variants, delivering between 204 to 313 HP, and showcasing impressive torque of up to 494 Nm. With acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h taking just 5.6 seconds in the higher variant, BMW clearly emphasizes a sporty experience. In contrast, the Volvo EC40's rear-wheel-drive configuration delivers 238 to 252 HP with a respectable torque of 420 Nm. The EC40 is slightly behind in terms of acceleration, achieving 0-100 km/h in 7.3 seconds, but its performance is still commendable for a compact SUV.
Efficiency is key in the electric vehicle segment, and both models make significant strides with their energy consumption. The iX2 consumes between 15.9 to 16.9 kWh/100km, while the EC40 offers slightly higher consumption rates of 16.2 to 16.7 kWh/100km. However, the EC40 excels in range, providing an impressive maximum of 584 km, while the iX2 achieves a range of up to 459 km. This factor may sway potential buyers who prioritize longer trips without frequent charging interruptions.
The BMW iX2 comes equipped with a battery capacity ranging from 64.8 kWh, enabling a balanced performance and weight management with a curb weight of 1960 kg. Meanwhile, the Volvo EC40 features a larger battery capacity, up to 79 kWh, making it heavier at about 2065 kg. Despite the weight, the EC40's significant range could justify the extra burden for those who prioritize distance over nimble handling.
Comfort is another critical consideration in the SUV segment. The BMW iX2 provides ample passenger space with a trunk capacity of 525 liters, making it suitable for families or users needing additional storage. The Volvo EC40, while slightly smaller in trunk capacity at 404 liters, still offers enough room for everyday use. In terms of dimensions, the iX2 measures 4554 mm in length, with a height of 1560 mm, whereas the EC40 is slightly shorter at 4440 mm and taller at 1591 mm. This translates into a roomier atmosphere in the Volvo, particularly with its height advantage.
On the technological front, both vehicles are equipped with the latest electric vehicle technologies. The BMW iX2 features an intuitive infotainment system with advanced driver-assist features, ensuring an engaging driving experience paired with robust safety features. The iX2 also stands out with its sleek digital cockpit that enhances the driving vibe. On the other hand, the Volvo EC40 boasts its renowned safety innovations with advanced driver-assistance systems, providing peace of mind for drivers and passengers. Volvo's commitment to sustainability extends to its materials, as the EC40 incorporates recycled materials in its interior design.
In conclusion, the choice between the BMW iX2 and Volvo EC40 ultimately revolves around personal priorities. The iX2 excels in sporty performance, trunk space, and a high-tech experience, while the EC40 stands out with longer range and a taller, possibly more comfortable interior. Both SUVs embody the transition towards electric mobility, offering unique advantages in their pursuit of eco-conscious driving. Deciding which one takes the crown will ultimately depend on what the driver values most: performance or efficiency, space or style.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 42800 - 54400
£
|
Price
about 45200 - 58500
£
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 16.9
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3
kWh
|
Electric Range
433 - 459
km
|
Electric Range
487 - 584
km
|
Battery Capacity
64.8
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
67 - 79
kWh
|
co2
0
g/km
|
co2
0
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1960 - 2095
kg
|
Curb weight
2065 - 2185
kg
|
Trunk capacity
525
L
|
Trunk capacity
404
L
|
Length
4554
mm
|
Length
4440
mm
|
Width
1845
mm
|
Width
1873
mm
|
Height
1560
mm
|
Height
1591
mm
|
Payload
500 - 510
kg
|
Payload
395 - 435
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
204 - 313
HP
|
Power HP
238 - 408
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 8.6
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3
s
|
Max Speed
170 - 180
km/h
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Torque
250 - 494
Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Power kW
150 - 230
kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325
kW
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Top speed
170 - 180
km/h
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.