Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Audi Q4 e-tron or Volvo EC40?
The rapidly evolving landscape of electric vehicles has introduced some remarkable contenders. In the spotlight today, we have the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EC40, two SUVs that promise innovation, performance, and sustainability. Let's delve into the technical prowess and unique features of these electrified warriors.
The Audi Q4 e-tron is available with a selection of power outputs ranging from 170 to a robust 340 horsepower, driven through either rear-wheel or all-wheel configurations. With an acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in as fast as 5.4 seconds, it doesn’t compromise on exhilarating performance despite its substantial curb weight of up to 2235 kg. Audi’s transmission is a seamless automatic reduction gearbox, optimizing efficiency and drive smoothness.
On the other hand, the Volvo EC40 comes equipped with power options between 238 and an impressive 408 horsepower. It achieves a slightly faster 0 to 100 km/h time of 4.6 seconds, closely competing with Audi’s performance credentials. Like the Audi, the EC40 employs an automatic reduction gearbox for its transmission duties, ensuring quiet and efficient cruising.
Efficiency is where these SUVs truly shine. The Q4 e-tron boasts various electric ranges depending on the configuration, stretching up to a commendable 554 km on a single charge, while consumption hovers around 15.9 to 17.4 kWh/100 km. The battery options include capacities of 52 and 77 kWh, accommodating diverse driving needs.
Competing closely, the Volvo EC40 offers an outstanding range, peaking at 584 km. It promises a competitive consumption figure between 16.2 and 17.3 kWh/100 km. The available battery capacities are 67 and 79 kWh, illustrating the EC40’s focus on long journeys and efficiency.
Design is a subjective realm, yet both brands offer their distinct aesthetic. The Audi Q4 e-tron, at a length of 4588 mm, exudes an assertive road presence, complemented by a spacious interior that accommodates five passengers comfortably. With a trunk capacity reaching up to 535 liters, practicality is as much a priority as style.
The Volvo EC40’s sleek silhouette, spanning a length of 4440 mm, also welcomes five occupants, though its trunk capacity is slightly smaller at 404 liters. Volvo's design language focuses on Nordic minimalism and sophistication, catering to those who desire a blend of form and function.
Both the Audi Q4 e-tron and Volvo EC40 bring their unique strengths to the table, appealing to different types of drivers. Audi offers a slightly longer range and a bigger boot space, making it a strong contender for longer trips and families who need extra space. Conversely, Volvo impresses with its slightly quicker acceleration and pioneering design.
Your choice between them might ultimately hinge on preference for brand aesthetics, specific range needs, or power desires. In the growing world of electric SUVs, both models epitomize the progress and potential of sustainable automotive innovation.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Audi Q4 e-tron has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 39600 £, while the Volvo EC40 costs 46600 £. That’s a price difference of around 7063 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Audi Q4 e-tron: with 15.90 kWh per 100 km, it’s barely noticeable more efficient than the Volvo EC40 with 16.20 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.30 kWh.
As for range, the Volvo EC40 performs minimal better – achieving up to 584 km, about 30 km more than the Audi Q4 e-tron.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 has a evident edge – offering 442 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Audi Q4 e-tron takes 5.40 s. That’s about 0.80 s faster.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q4 e-tron pulls slight stronger with 679 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 9 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Audi Q4 e-tron is barely noticeable lighter – 2035 kg compared to 2065 kg. The difference is around 30 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers clearly perceptible more room – 535 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 131 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Audi Q4 e-tron performs to a small extent better – up to 1490 L, which is about 294 L more than the Volvo EC40.
When it comes to payload, Audi Q4 e-tron somewhat takes the win – 515 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 80 kg.
The Audi Q4 e-tron proves to be has a very small edge and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Audi Q4 e-tron is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Audi AG
The Audi Q4 e-tron brings Audi polish into the electric crossover scene, pairing a sleek exterior with a refined, airy interior that makes everyday driving feel distinctly premium. It’s an easy-to-live-with EV that balances comfort and real-world usability with intuitive tech, making it a smart choice for buyers who want electric mobility without giving up Audi character — and yes, it still looks good in the driveway.
details
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
The Volvo EC40 seamlessly combines cutting-edge technology with sleek Scandinavian design, offering a refined driving experience. With its advanced safety features and user-friendly infotainment system, this model caters to both seasoned drivers and modern tech enthusiasts. The vehicle's impressive efficiency and environmentally conscious engineering make it a standout choice for those seeking sustainability without compromising on style.
details
@ Volvo Cars
|
@ Audi AG
|
@ Volvo Cars
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39600 - 58800 £
|
Price
46600 - 59000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.4 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
406 - 554 km
|
Electric Range
488 - 584 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2035 - 2235 kg
|
Curb weight
2065 - 2185 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
520 - 535 L
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
|
Length
4588 mm
|
Length
4440 mm
|
|
Width
1865 mm
|
Width
1873 mm
|
|
Height
1614 - 1632 mm
|
Height
1591 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1460 - 1490 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1196 L
|
|
Payload
505 - 515 kg
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The Audi Q4 e-tron is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España