Compare performance (442 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (46,600 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EC40 or Skoda Elroq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
As the electric vehicle (EV) market continues to expand, consumers are faced with more choices than ever before. Among the noteworthy contenders are the Volvo EC40 and the Skoda Elroq, both modern electric SUVs boasting impressive specifications and features. This comparison aims to dissect the technical aspects and innovations that set these two vehicles apart.
Both the Volvo EC40 and Skoda Elroq embody the SUV aesthetic, with their robust frames and commanding stances. The EC40 measures 4440 mm in length, 1873 mm in width, and 1591 mm in height, while the Elroq is slightly larger at 4488 mm long, 1884 mm wide, and 1625 mm tall. This size difference translates to a cargo space advantage for the Elroq, providing a trunk capacity of 470 liters compared to the EC40's 404 liters.
The EC40 offers a range of power outputs, with options from 238 HP to 408 HP, featuring both rear-wheel and all-wheel drive versions. It boasts a remarkable torque range up to 670 Nm, enabling an impressive acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 4.6 seconds. The Skoda Elroq, on the other hand, has a narrower performance range, delivering 170 HP to 286 HP, exclusive to rear-wheel drive. Its torque caps at 545 Nm, with acceleration times varying between 6.6 to 9 seconds.
Both models are commendable in terms of efficiency, but the Skoda Elroq claims a slightly better consumption rate, achieving as low as 15.2 kWh/100 km compared to Volvo's best of 16.2 kWh/100 km. Range is also a key factor: the EC40 excels with a maximum electric range of 584 km, while the Elroq offers a maximum of 572 km. This marginal difference can influence long-distance travel decisions for potential buyers.
The EC40's battery options include 67 kWh and 79 kWh variants, whereas the Elroq offers 52 kWh and 77 kWh options. This allows the EC40 to provide more flexibility in power management, catering to users with varying driving needs. Additionally, the advanced battery management system incorporated in both vehicles ensures efficient energy use and longevity.
Inside the cabin, both models seat five passengers comfortably. The Volvo EC40 is renowned for its Scandinavian minimalist design combined with cutting-edge technology, including an extensive infotainment system equipped with Google services integration. The Skoda Elroq, meanwhile, focuses on practicality and ease of use, featuring a user-friendly infotainment system and a spacious interior that elevates passenger comfort.
In line with industry trends, both the EC40 and Elroq are classified with a CO2 efficiency class of A, signifying zero tailpipe emissions. Volvo and Skoda are committed to sustainability, engaging in eco-friendly production processes and aiming for carbon neutrality across their operations.
Choosing between the Volvo EC40 and Skoda Elroq ultimately comes down to personal preferences and priorities. The EC40 offers superior performance and range, perfect for those who seek a powerful driving experience. Conversely, the Elroq shines in efficiency and practicality, making it an ideal choice for everyday use and family needs. Both vehicles represent a leap forward in electric mobility, showcasing how far the automotive industry has come—and how much more innovation lies ahead.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Elroq is visibly cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,752 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Elroq is very slightly more efficient: consuming 15.2 kWh/100km compared to 16.2 kWh/100km for the Volvo EC40. That’s a difference of about 1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo EC40 offers marginally more range – reaching up to 584 km, about 11 km more than the Skoda Elroq.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers clearly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Skoda Elroq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Elroq delivers only slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 9 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo EC40 is barely lighter – 2,065 kg compared to 2,133 kg. The difference is around 68 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Elroq offers moderately more boot space – 470 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 66 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Elroq offers clearly more capacity – up to 1,580 L, about 384 L more than the Volvo EC40.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Elroq carries a bit more – 517 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 82 kg.
The Skoda Elroq is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.
details
The Skoda Elroq is a cleverly packaged family SUV that mixes roomy practicality with sharp, modern looks, making it an easy pick for buyers who prefer common sense over flash. On the road it's composed and user-friendly, with thoughtful interior details that turn everyday driving into something pleasantly efficient — a sensible companion with a wink.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
46,600 - 59,000 £
|
Price
37,900 - 45,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 16.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
488 - 584 km
|
Electric Range
529 - 573 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
77 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
|
Curb weight
2,133 - 2,268 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
|
Length
4,440 mm
|
Length
4,488 mm
|
|
Width
1,873 mm
|
Width
1,884 mm
|
|
Height
1,591 mm
|
Height
1,608 - 1,625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,196 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,580 L
|
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Payload
470 - 517 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España