What drive types are available for the Volvo XC40?

The Volvo XC40 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Volvo XC40's engine?

Up to 197 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the Volvo XC40 according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 6.50 L.

What maximum speed does the Volvo XC40 reach?

The Volvo XC40 reaches up to 180 km/h.

What are the Volvo XC40’s length, width and height?

The Volvo XC40 measures 4425 mm long, 1863 mm wide and 1652 mm high.

Is the Polestar 2 offered with different drivetrains?

The Polestar 2 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Polestar 2's engine?

Up to 476 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much electricity does the Polestar 2 use per 100 km?

Average electricity consumption is 14.80 kWh.

What is the electric driving range of the Polestar 2?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 659 km.

How large is the Polestar 2’s battery?

The Polestar 2 comes with a 78 kWh battery.

What maximum speed does the Polestar 2 reach?

Depending on the model, top speed is 205 km/h.

What is the Polestar 2’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 405 L fit inside.

What are the dimensions of the Polestar 2?

Length 4606 mm, width 1859 mm, height 1479 mm – those are the dimensions of the Polestar 2.

Volvo XC40 vs Polestar 2 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC40

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Volvo XC40 has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £ , while the Polestar 2 costs 42000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5229 £.

2

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 2 has a decisively edge – offering 476 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 279 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 2 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.20 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 3.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Polestar 2 performs somewhat better – reaching 205 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 25 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Polestar 2 pulls convincingly stronger with 740 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 440 Nm difference.

XC40

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is slightly lighter – 1688 kg compared to 2015 kg. The difference is around 327 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers to a small extent more room – 452 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 47 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC40 performs somewhat better – up to 1328 L, which is about 233 L more than the Polestar 2.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 evident takes the win – 532 kg compared to 421 kg. That’s a difference of about 111 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Polestar 2 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (4 Reviews)

Reviews Polestar 2

5 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

Nissan Qashqai

Volvo XC40

VS

The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …

Volvo XC40

VW T-Roc

VS

The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …

Costs and Consumption
Price 36800 - 47200 £	Price 42000 - 57400 £
Consumption L/100km 6.50 L	Consumption L/100km -
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.8 kWh
Electric Range -	Electric Range 554 - 659 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 78 kWh
co2 147 - 148 g/km	co2 0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 54 L	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type Sedan
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1688 kg	Curb weight 2015 - 2188 kg
Trunk capacity 452 L	Trunk capacity 405 L
Length 4425 mm	Length 4606 mm
Width 1863 mm	Width 1859 mm
Height 1652 mm	Height 1473 - 1479 mm
Max trunk capacity 1328 L	Max trunk capacity 1095 L
Payload 532 kg	Payload 375 - 421 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP 163 - 197 HP	Power HP 272 - 476 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.6 - 8.6 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 4.2 - 6.4 s
Max Speed 180 km/h	Max Speed 205 km/h
Torque 265 - 300 Nm	Torque 490 - 740 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders -
Power kW 120 - 145 kW	Power kW 200 - 350 kW
Engine capacity 1969 cm3	Engine capacity -