What drive types are available for the Volvo XC40?

The Volvo XC40 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Volvo XC40's engine?

Up to 197 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the Volvo XC40 according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 6.50 L.

What maximum speed does the Volvo XC40 reach?

The Volvo XC40 reaches up to 180 km/h.

What are the Volvo XC40’s length, width and height?

The Volvo XC40 measures 4425 mm long, 1863 mm wide and 1652 mm high.

What drivetrain options does the VW Polo have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the VW Polo?

The VW Polo reaches a peak output of 207 HP, depending on the model.

How much fuel does the VW Polo use?

On average, the VW Polo consumes 5.10 L.

What are the dimensions of the VW Polo?

The VW Polo measures 4074 mm long, 1751 mm wide and 1451 mm high.

Volvo XC40 vs VW Polo – Which car is better? Specs, differences & prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

VW Polo has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 17000 £, while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 19761 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW Polo manages with 5.10 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 1.40 L per 100 km.

Polo @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the VW Polo has a slight edge – offering 207 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 10 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Polo is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 6.50 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW Polo performs noticeable better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW Polo pulls barely noticeable stronger with 320 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm difference.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW Polo is clearly lighter – 1143 kg compared to 1688 kg. The difference is around 545 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers noticeable more room – 452 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 101 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC40 performs to a small extent better – up to 1328 L, which is about 203 L more than the VW Polo.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 a bit takes the win – 532 kg compared to 457 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the VW Polo shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)

Reviews VW Polo

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …

@ Nissan Motor Corporation

The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …

Costs and Consumption
Price 36800 - 47200 £	Price 17000 - 30400 £
Consumption L/100km 6.50 L	Consumption L/100km 5.1 - 6.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 147 - 148 g/km	co2 116 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 54 L	Fuel tank capacity 40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type Hatchback
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1688 kg	Curb weight 1143 - 1378 kg
Trunk capacity 452 L	Trunk capacity 351 L
Length 4425 mm	Length 4074 mm
Width 1863 mm	Width 1751 mm
Height 1652 mm	Height 1431 - 1451 mm
Max trunk capacity 1328 L	Max trunk capacity 1125 L
Payload 532 kg	Payload 432 - 457 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 163 - 197 HP	Power HP 80 - 207 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.6 - 8.6 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.5 - 15.6 s
Max Speed 180 km/h	Max Speed 171 - 240 km/h
Torque 265 - 300 Nm	Torque 93 - 320 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 120 - 145 kW	Power kW 59 - 152 kW
Engine capacity 1969 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1984 cm3