VS

Volvo XC60 vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (406 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (58,300 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC60 or Mazda CX-5?

Volvo XC60 vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

XC60

Performance and Power: Mazda CX-5 vs. Volvo XC60

When it comes to power and performance, the Mazda CX-5 and Volvo XC60 offer unique experiences. The Mazda CX-5 provides a range of engine options, including petrol and diesel variants with power outputs ranging from 150 HP to 194 HP. The torque peaks at 445 Nm, ensuring decent acceleration, especially suited for urban and highway driving. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h varies between 9.2 to 11.1 seconds, which is competitive for its class.

In contrast, the Volvo XC60 stands out with a powerful lineup, including petrol MHEV and Plugin Hybrid options. With a power range between 250 HP and 455 HP, the XC60 is a formidable player in the SUV space. Its torque reaches up to 709 Nm, with striking 0 to 100 km/h acceleration times falling between 4.9 and 6.9 seconds. Such performance metrics undoubtedly position the XC60 as a sporty, performance-oriented SUV.

CX-5

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel efficiency is a critical factor for many SUV buyers. The Mazda CX-5 showcases consumption rates between 5.6 L/100km to 7.6 L/100km. However, its CO2 emissions vary from 146 g/km to 173 g/km, placing it mostly in the less attractive CO2 efficiency classes of E and F.

The Volvo XC60, with an innovative Plugin Hybrid option, offers much-improved consumption, particularly highlighted by the 0.9 L/100km in its hybrid variants. With CO2 emissions down to 22 g/km in the hybrid model, it presents a more environmentally friendly option, especially with an 80 km electric range. These figures position the XC60 as a more sustainable choice for eco-conscious drivers.

XC60

Comfort and Interior Space

Both the CX-5 and XC60 feature spacious interiors accommodating five passengers comfortably. The Mazda CX-5 offers a trunk capacity between 510 to 522 liters, providing ample space for luggage and essential gear. With a length of 4575 mm, it strikes a balance between spaciousness and maneuverability.

The Volvo XC60, slightly larger with a length of 4688 mm, has a trunk capacity ranging between 468 to 483 liters. While the cargo space is slightly less than the CX-5, the XC60 makes up for it in luxurious interior finishes and advanced tech features, reflecting Volvo’s commitment to premium comfort and user experience.

CX-5

Specifications and Drive Comfort

In terms of drivetrain, the Mazda CX-5 offers both Front-Wheel Drive and All-Wheel Drive options, along with either a manual or automatic transmission, catering to various driving preferences. Its curb weight spans from 1567 kg to 1800 kg.

The Volvo XC60 exclusively features All-Wheel Drive, paired with automatic transmission, simplifying the choice for those favoring a certain driving dynamic. However, with a curb weight stretching from 1900 kg to 2150 kg, it is on the heavier side, a factor to consider when evaluating handling and agility.

XC60

Conclusion: Crafting the Ideal SUV Experience

In the compare of the Mazda CX-5 vs. Volvo XC60, both offer compelling propositions tailored to different automotive needs. The CX-5 is an excellent choice for those seeking versatility and cost-efficient operation. Meanwhile, the XC60 delivers powerful performance with a focus on luxury and technological innovation, especially for those who prioritize greener driving solutions without sacrificing excitement or style.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Comparing the Volvo XC60 and the Volvo EX60 pits a familiar midsize premium SUV against Volvo’s new all-electric contender: the XC60 offers refined petrol and hybrid options while the EX60 focuses on pure-electric range, sharper tech and lower running costs. If you’re choosing between established …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC60

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-5 is considerably cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 58,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 28,286 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 1.6 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 5.4 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers significantly more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 265 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 5.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers significantly more torque with 669 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 431 Nm more.

XC60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is clearly lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 521 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries slightly more – 601 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 91 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £58,300
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 335 - 406 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 79 km
details
Volvo XC60
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC60 and the VW Tayron are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want a blend of style, practicality and advanced tech, but they offer distinctly different personalities. The XC60 leans toward Scandinavian refinement, safety and a comfortable ride, while the VW Tayron delivers a more …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Volvo XC60 comes down to whether you want the Kuga’s practical, value-driven approach or the XC60’s more premium, safety-focused experience. I’ll compare their space, comfort, technology, running costs and driving feel to help you pick the SUV that best fits …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 and Volvo XC60 are two leading compact SUVs that serve similar needs but with distinct priorities: the RAV4 emphasizes value, reliability and fuel efficiency, while the XC60 leans toward premium comfort, advanced safety tech and a more refined driving experience. Choosing between …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Volvo XC60
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
79 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
59 g/km
co2
157 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,150 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,902 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
510 kg
Payload
566 - 601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC60?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.