VS

Volvo XC60 vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (455 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (49,200 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC60 or Mazda CX-5?

Volvo XC60 vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Volvo XC60

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • a bit lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

XC60

Performance and Power: Mazda CX-5 vs. Volvo XC60

When it comes to power and performance, the Mazda CX-5 and Volvo XC60 offer unique experiences. The Mazda CX-5 provides a range of engine options, including petrol and diesel variants with power outputs ranging from 150 HP to 194 HP. The torque peaks at 445 Nm, ensuring decent acceleration, especially suited for urban and highway driving. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h varies between 9.2 to 11.1 seconds, which is competitive for its class.

In contrast, the Volvo XC60 stands out with a powerful lineup, including petrol MHEV and Plugin Hybrid options. With a power range between 250 HP and 455 HP, the XC60 is a formidable player in the SUV space. Its torque reaches up to 709 Nm, with striking 0 to 100 km/h acceleration times falling between 4.9 and 6.9 seconds. Such performance metrics undoubtedly position the XC60 as a sporty, performance-oriented SUV.

CX-5

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel efficiency is a critical factor for many SUV buyers. The Mazda CX-5 showcases consumption rates between 5.6 L/100km to 7.6 L/100km. However, its CO2 emissions vary from 146 g/km to 173 g/km, placing it mostly in the less attractive CO2 efficiency classes of E and F.

The Volvo XC60, with an innovative Plugin Hybrid option, offers much-improved consumption, particularly highlighted by the 0.9 L/100km in its hybrid variants. With CO2 emissions down to 22 g/km in the hybrid model, it presents a more environmentally friendly option, especially with an 80 km electric range. These figures position the XC60 as a more sustainable choice for eco-conscious drivers.

XC60

Comfort and Interior Space

Both the CX-5 and XC60 feature spacious interiors accommodating five passengers comfortably. The Mazda CX-5 offers a trunk capacity between 510 to 522 liters, providing ample space for luggage and essential gear. With a length of 4575 mm, it strikes a balance between spaciousness and maneuverability.

The Volvo XC60, slightly larger with a length of 4688 mm, has a trunk capacity ranging between 468 to 483 liters. While the cargo space is slightly less than the CX-5, the XC60 makes up for it in luxurious interior finishes and advanced tech features, reflecting Volvo’s commitment to premium comfort and user experience.

CX-5

Specifications and Drive Comfort

In terms of drivetrain, the Mazda CX-5 offers both Front-Wheel Drive and All-Wheel Drive options, along with either a manual or automatic transmission, catering to various driving preferences. Its curb weight spans from 1567 kg to 1800 kg.

The Volvo XC60 exclusively features All-Wheel Drive, paired with automatic transmission, simplifying the choice for those favoring a certain driving dynamic. However, with a curb weight stretching from 1900 kg to 2150 kg, it is on the heavier side, a factor to consider when evaluating handling and agility.

XC60

Conclusion: Crafting the Ideal SUV Experience

In the compare of the Mazda CX-5 vs. Volvo XC60, both offer compelling propositions tailored to different automotive needs. The CX-5 is an excellent choice for those seeking versatility and cost-efficient operation. Meanwhile, the XC60 delivers powerful performance with a focus on luxury and technological innovation, especially for those who prioritize greener driving solutions without sacrificing excitement or style.

Frequently compared as well

Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 is the no-nonsense, go-anywhere compact SUV that scores on reliability, fuel economy and roomy practicality — ideal if you want low fuss, sensible running costs and maximum value. The Volvo XC60 swaps thrift for Scandinavian refinement, with a classier cabin, advanced safety tech …
Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Meet the Volvo XC60 and the new Volvo EX60 — two mid‑size premium SUVs that look like cousins but drive like rivals, one rooted in combustion tradition and the other staking Volvo’s claim in the electric future. Which should you buy: the familiar, comfort-first XC60 that does everything reliably …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC60

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-5 is considerably cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,200 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 2.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 4.2 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers significantly more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 314 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 5.6 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Mazda CX-5 is very slightly faster – reaching 195 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers significantly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 471 Nm more.

XC60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is a bit lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 271 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers somewhat more boot space – 583 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 100 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 offers clearly more capacity – up to 2,019 L, about 476 L more than the Volvo XC60.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries very slightly more – 601 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 51 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,200
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km
details
Volvo XC60
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
BMW iX3
Volvo XC60
VS
The BMW iX3 and Volvo XC60 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of the crossovers, the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 stand out with distinct personalities. The CR-V, known for its reliability and value, excels in practicality with a spacious interior and impressive fuel efficiency. On the other hand, the XC60's luxurious design and advanced safety …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Volvo XC60
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
64 - 169 g/km
co2
157 - 168 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
Length
4,708 mm
Length
4,690 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
1,655 mm
Height
1,695 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
Payload
510 - 550 kg
Payload
601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
195 km/h
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC60?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.