VS

Volvo XC60 vs VW Caddy Compact Van – Differences & prices compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Volvo XC60 or VW Caddy Compact Van fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC60 @ media.volvocars.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW Caddy Compact Van has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25800 £, while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £. That’s a price difference of around 23370 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW Caddy Compact Van manages with 0.50 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Volvo XC60 with 2.80 L. The difference is about 2.30 L per 100 km.

As for range, the VW Caddy Compact Van performs noticeable better – achieving up to 120 km, about 38 km more than the Volvo XC60.

Caddy Compact Van @ vwpress

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a convincingly edge – offering 455 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 305 HP more horsepower.

In terms of top speed, the VW Caddy Compact Van performs minimal better – reaching 186 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls convincingly stronger with 709 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 389 Nm difference.

XC60 @ media.volvocars.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Volvo XC60 offers decisively more seating capacity – 5 vs 2.

In curb weight, VW Caddy Compact Van is evident lighter – 1442 kg compared to 1900 kg. The difference is around 458 kg.

In maximum load capacity, the VW Caddy Compact Van performs decisively better – up to 3700 L, which is about 2157 L more than the Volvo XC60.

When it comes to payload, VW Caddy Compact Van noticeable takes the win – 759 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 209 kg.

Who wins the race?

The VW Caddy Compact Van proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
VW Caddy Compact Van is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £25,800
Small-27321-ThenewCaddyLife

VW Caddy Compact Van

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 102 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.5 - 6.8 L
  • Electric Range : 117 - 120 km
details

Volvo XC60

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo XC60 strikes a perfect balance between contemporary design and practical functionality, making it an appealing choice for those in search of a reliable and stylish SUV. Its interior showcases a blend of high-quality materials and innovative technology, ensuring a comfortable and seamless driving experience. With its emphasis on safety and environmental sustainability, the XC60 continues to stand out in the competitive SUV market.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ media.volvocars.com
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ media.volvocars.com
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ media.volvocars.com
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior @ media.volvocars.com
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior @ media.volvocars.com

VW Caddy Compact Van

The VW Caddy small van is a versatile option for those seeking a practical and efficient transporter. With its sleek design and innovative features, it caters well to both business needs and everyday convenience. The interior is thoughtfully designed, offering comfort and ample space for cargo or passengers, making it a reliable choice for various tasks.

details
Small-27321-ThenewCaddyLife @ vwpress
Small-27320-ThenewCaddyLife @ vwpress
Small-27309-ThenewCaddyLife @ vwpress
Small-27313-ThenewCaddyLife @ vwpress

Similar Comparisons

Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Volvo XC60 stands out with its elegant Scandinavian design and a strong emphasis on safety features, making it a top choice for families and safety-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the VW Tayron impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, appealing to those seeking a versatile SUV for both urban and adventurous lifestyles. Ultimately, both vehicles offer unique strengths, catering to different preferences in the competitive midsize SUV market.
Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota RAV4 and Volvo XC60 each bring their unique strengths to the table. The RAV4 excels with its reliability and spacious interior, making it an excellent choice for families who prioritize practicality. In contrast, the XC60 offers a luxurious experience with advanced safety features and a refined design, appealing to those who seek a more premium driving experience.
Volvo XC60
VW Caddy Compact Van
XC60
Caddy Compact Van

Costs and Consumption
Price
49200 - 75100 £
Price
25800 - 42300 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Electric Range
117 - 120 km
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
64 - 169 g/km
co2
11 - 154 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
5
Doors
4 - 5
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
Curb weight
1442 - 1818 kg
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4708 mm
Length
4500 - 4853 mm
Width
1902 mm
Width
1855 mm
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
Height
1819 - 1823 mm
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
Max trunk capacity
3100 - 3700 L
Payload
510 - 550 kg
Payload
628 - 759 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Torque
220 - 320 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1968 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
Brand
Volvo
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the head-to-head comparison of the Volvo XC60 and Lynk & Co 08, both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table. The Volvo XC60 stands out with its time-tested reputation for safety and luxury, offering a refined driving experience and robust build quality. On the other hand, the Lynk & Co 08, leveraging its youthful brand ethos, impresses with its modern connectivity features and a distinctive, daring design that aims to capture the attention of tech-savvy drivers.
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
In the ongoing battle of luxury and practicality, the Volvo V60 and Volvo XC60 stand as captivating contenders. The V60, a sleek station wagon, offers a refined driving experience with impressive fuel efficiency and an interior designed for comfort. In contrast, the XC60, a compact SUV, boasts a higher driving position and ample space, making it the ideal choice for those seeking versatility without compromising on elegance.
Mercedes GLC
Volvo XC60
VS
When it comes to luxury compact SUVs, the Mercedes GLC and Volvo XC60 both offer a blend of performance, style, and cutting-edge technology. The Mercedes GLC stands out with its elegant interior and advanced infotainment system, perfect for those who value luxury and connectivity. Alternatively, the Volvo XC60 impresses with its emphasis on safety features and Scandinavian design, appealing to buyers looking for both security and aesthetics in their driving experience.
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
In the highly competitive midsize SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Volvo XC60 stand out for their distinctive approaches to style and performance. While the Kuga excels with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the XC60 offers a luxurious cabin and a refined driving experience. Ultimately, buyers seeking practicality may lean towards the Kuga, while those prioritizing comfort and prestige might favor the Volvo.
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Volvo XC60 and VW Tiguan stand out with their unique offerings. The XC60 boasts cutting-edge safety features and a luxurious interior, making it a favorite for those prioritizing comfort and security. Meanwhile, the Tiguan impresses with its spaciousness and versatility, appealing to families in need of practicality without sacrificing style.
BYD Seal U
Volvo XC60
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the BYD Seal U and the Volvo XC60, both vehicles showcase impressive features tailored to different driving preferences. The BYD Seal U offers an attractive blend of cutting-edge electric technology and spacious interior, making it ideal for eco-conscious buyers. Conversely, the Volvo XC60 stands out with its luxurious design and advanced safety features, appealing to those who value comfort and reliability in their driving experience.
Renault Rafale
Volvo XC60
VS
Hyundai Tucson
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Volvo XC60 stand out for their distinct approaches to comfort and technology. The Tucson impresses with its spacious interior and user-friendly tech features, making it a great family vehicle. Meanwhile, the XC60 offers a more luxurious feel with its high-end materials and refined ride, appealing to buyers seeking a premium experience.
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC60?

The Volvo XC60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.