VS

Volvo XC90 vs Omoda 9 comparison

Compare performance (406 HP vs 537 HP), boot space and price (74,300 £ vs 45,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC90 or Omoda 9?

Volvo XC90 vs Omoda 9: Key differences

Volvo XC90

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly lighter
details

Omoda 9

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • significantly more electric range
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC90

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Omoda 9 is significantly cheaper – starting at 45,300 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 74,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 28,963 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Omoda 9 uses 1.6 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Volvo XC90 with 3.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.8 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Omoda 9 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 145 km, about 76 km more than the Volvo XC90.

XC90

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 9 offers clearly more power – delivering 537 HP compared to 406 HP. That’s roughly 131 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 9 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Volvo XC90 takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC90 delivers only slightly more torque with 669 Nm compared to 650 Nm. That’s about 19 Nm more.

XC90

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Volvo XC90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo XC90 is very slightly lighter – 2,080 kg compared to 2,270 kg. The difference is around 190 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC90 carries markedly more – 710 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 263 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Omoda 9 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£45,342
default

Omoda 9

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 537 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 145 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Lynk & Co 08
Omoda 9
VS
The Lynk & Co 08 and the Omoda 9 are two fresh contenders in the compact SUV segment, each promising standout styling, modern tech and family-friendly space. This quick comparison focuses on the real differences in driving feel, interior quality, fuel efficiency and value so you can decide which …
XPeng G9
Omoda 9
VS
The XPeng G9 and Omoda 9 are two electric SUVs that square off on range, tech features and overall value—each targets buyers who want a spacious, high-tech mid‑size EV. This short comparison will focus on their driving feel, interior quality, charging performance and pricing to help you pick the …
Volvo XC90
Omoda 9

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo XC90

The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.

details
294665_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue
294657_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue
294651_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue
248324_XC90_Plug-In_Hybrid_Inscription_T8_-_Seat_Configuration
294870_XC90_Recharge_interior

Reviews Volvo XC90

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Ffg
16 May 2026, 03:34:35

Ffggggggg ffg

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Borstel
11 Nov 2025, 12:59:12

I drive both cars. The XC90’s boot is — contrary to the figures posted here — noticeably larger than the GLC’s when carrying five people. Overall the XC90 is clearly the more comfortable and, above all, the more stable — and therefore the safer — car.

Omoda 9

The Omoda 9 blends bold, contemporary styling with a surprisingly spacious and well-appointed interior that punches above its class. It offers a composed, comfortable ride and modern infotainment and safety features that make it a strong choice for buyers wanting a practical yet stylish family crossover.

details

Reviews Omoda 9

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Tommy
11 Jun 2026, 08:29:12

I recently bought the Omoda 9 — it's a premium car at the right price.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC90
MG MGS9
VS
The Volvo XC90 and the MG MGS9 are rival seven-seat SUVs aimed at buyers who want space, comfort and modern tech — but they come from very different traditions: Volvo leans on safety, refined materials and a premium driving feel, while MG focuses on affordability and generous equipment. This quick …
MG MGS9
Omoda 9
VS
The MG MGS9 and Omoda 9 are two bold, tech-focused SUVs from rising Chinese brands, both aimed at buyers who want roomy interiors, strong equipment levels and distinct styling without premium-brand prices. This comparison looks past the headlines to help you choose which one fits your …
Toyota RAV4
Omoda 9
VS
The RAV4 and the Omoda 9 represent two distinct approaches to the compact SUV: the RAV4 is a well-proven, practical choice with strong resale and dealer support, while the Omoda 9 brings bold styling and a tech-rich package at a competitive price. This short comparison will help you weigh long-term …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
BYD Sealion 7
Omoda 9
VS
The BYD Sealion 7 and Omoda 9 are direct rivals in the modern, tech-forward family car space, each promising strong value, roomy cabins and a long feature list. This comparison will help you see how the Sealion 7’s approach to efficiency and refinement stacks up against the Omoda 9’s emphasis on …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
Peugeot 5008
Volvo XC90
VS
The Peugeot 5008 and Volvo XC90 both offer three-row seating but aim at different buyers: the 5008 is a practical, value-focused family SUV while the XC90 is a premium, safety-led luxury SUV. This comparison will focus on space, comfort, performance, efficiency and running costs to help you decide …
Volvo XC90
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC90 is the serene, safety-obsessed family flagship—roomy, plush and blessed with Volvo’s calm Scandinavian style and efficient hybrid options that make long hauls a pleasure. The VW Tayron, by contrast, is the scrappy value player: sharper to drive, loaded with slick tech for less money, …
Volvo XC90
Omoda 9

Costs and Consumption
Price
74,300 - 84,600 £
Price
45,300 £
Consumption L/100km
3.4 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
69 km
Electric Range
145 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
71 - 188 g/km
co2
38 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,080 - 2,350 kg
Curb weight
2,270 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
471 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,923 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
600 - 710 kg
Payload
447 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
250 - 406 HP
Power HP
537 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
360 - 669 Nm
Torque
650 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
184 - 299 kW
Power kW
395 kW
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Omoda
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC90?

The Volvo XC90 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.