Ford Kuga alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Ford Kuga, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

scroll down

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Ford Kuga and are good next research steps.

from £41,900

Volvo XC40

Price 41,900 - 46,100 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 163 - 197 HP
Consumption L/100km 6.5 L/100km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.6 - 8.6 s
Model Year 2026
Torque 265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4
Model XC40
Modell B3, B4
CO2 Efficiency Class E
Trim Level Plus DKG, Ultra DKG
Power kW 120 - 145 kW
co2 148 g/km
Engine capacity 1,969 cm3
Curb weight 1,688 kg
Width 1,863 mm
Brand Volvo
Payload 532 kg

details

Volvo XC40 as a suitable alternative to Ford Kuga

The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go Kuga; if you prefer a calmer, premium feel and a car that looks after you like a very fashionable safety blanket, choose the XC40.

The Volvo XC40 blends Scandinavian design with practical versatility, offering a compact luxury crossover that feels composed and easy to live with. It’s refined and focused on safety with a high-quality interior, making it a smart choice for daily city driving and weekend escapes.

Quick data check: Volvo XC40

visibly cheaper
slightly more power
significantly more efficient
marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
moderately lighter

Compare directly with Volvo XC40

from £26,400

VW T-Roc

Price 26,400 - 38,600 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 115 - 150 HP
Consumption L/100km 5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
Seats 4 - 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.9 - 12.3 s
Model Year 2,024 - 2,025
Torque 200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Model T-Roc
Modell T-Roc Cabriolet 1.0 TSI OPF, T-Roc Cabriolet 1.5 TSI OPF ACT, T-Roc 1.5 eTSI
CO2 Efficiency Class E, D
Trim Level Style, ENERGY, Style DSG, ENERGY DSG, R-Line, R-Line DSG, Trend DSG, Life DSG
Power kW 85 - 110 kW
co2 126 - 143 g/km
Engine capacity 999 - 1,498 cm3
Curb weight 1,465 - 1,539 kg
Trunk capacity 284 - 475 L
Width 1,811 - 1,828 mm
Brand VW
Payload 368 - 515 kg
Variant Cabriolet

details

VW T-Roc as a suitable alternative to Ford Kuga

In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable flair in your driveway.

The Volkswagen T‑Roc is a stylish, well-proportioned crossover that blends hatchback agility with SUV presence. It delivers a comfortable cabin, user-friendly tech and a composed ride, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want practicality with a bit of character.

Quick data check: VW T-Roc

noticeably more power
significantly more efficient
noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
markedly cheaper
barely lighter

Compare directly with VW T-Roc

from £35,800

CUPRA Formentor

Price 35,800 - 62,500 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 150 - 390 HP
Consumption L/100km 1.4 - 10.1 L/100km
Electric Range 117 - 126 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 4.2 - 9 s
Model Year 2,024 - 2,026
Torque 250 - 480 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4 - 5
Model Formentor
Modell Formentor VZ 2.0 TSI, Formentor 1.5 TSI, Formentor 1.5 eTSI, Formentor 2.0 TSI, Formentor 2.0 TDI, Formentor 1.5 e-HYBRID, Formentor VZ 1.5 e-HYBRID, Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI
CO2 Efficiency Class G, E, D, F, B
Trim Level DSG, Extreme DSG, 4Drive DSG, Black Edition DSG, Black Edition 4Drive DSG, Tribe Edition, Tribe Edition DSG, Tribe Edition 4Drive DSG, VZ Tribe Edition DSG, VZ Tribe Edition 4Drive DSG
Power kW 110 - 287 kW
co2 32 - 229 g/km
Engine capacity 1,498 - 2,480 cm3
Curb weight 1,434 - 1,742 kg
Trunk capacity 345 - 450 L
Width 1,839 - 1,852 mm
Brand CUPRA
Payload 439 - 526 kg

details

CUPRA Formentor as a suitable alternative to Ford Kuga

The Cupra Formentor and the Ford Kuga are two popular compact SUVs that take very different approaches: the Formentor prioritises sporty driving dynamics and striking design, while the Kuga focuses on comfort, practicality and efficient powertrains. This comparison will cover performance, interior space, running costs and equipment to help you decide which one best matches your priorities.

The CUPRA Formentor blends sporty driving dynamics with crossover practicality, delivering sharp handling and an engaging character that makes it fun on twisty roads as well as in daily driving. Inside, it pairs a driver-focused cabin and premium materials with clever practicality, offering a confident, distinctive alternative to conventional SUVs.

Quick data check: CUPRA Formentor

marginally cheaper
markedly more power
considerably more efficient
significantly more electric range
substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
very slightly lighter

Compare directly with CUPRA Formentor

from £34,200

Ford Explorer EV

Price 34,200 - 49,600 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 190 - 340 HP
Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range 417 - 602 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.3 - 8 s
Model Year 2026
Torque 350 - 679 Nm
Model Explorer EV
Modell Explorer EV Standard Range (58 kWh), Explorer EV Extended Range (79 kWh), Explorer EV Extended Range (77 kWh)
CO2 Efficiency Class A
Trim Level Style, Premium, Select, Select AWD, Premium AWD, Collection, Collection AWD
Power kW 140 - 250 kW
co2 0 g/km
Curb weight 1,996 - 2,209 kg
Trunk capacity 472 L
Width 1,872 mm
Brand Ford
Payload 531 - 585 kg

details

Ford Explorer EV as a suitable alternative to Ford Kuga

Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Ford Explorer EV means deciding whether you want a compact, efficient SUV with petrol/hybrid options or a larger, fully electric Explorer that prioritizes range, cabin space and advanced tech. I’ll walk through real-world running costs, driving feel, interior practicality and features so you can quickly see which best matches your daily needs.

The Explorer EV brings the familiar presence and practicality of an Explorer into the electric age, offering roomy comfort and modern tech for everyday life and family trips. It feels composed on the road and serves as a straightforward, user-friendly alternative to conventional gas-powered SUVs.

Quick data check: Ford Explorer EV

noticeably lighter
only slightly cheaper
visibly more power
clearly more electric range
noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h

Compare directly with Ford Explorer EV

from £34,300

BYD Seal U

Price 34,300 - 39,800 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 218 - 324 HP
Consumption kWh/100km 12.1 - 20.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range 70 - 500 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.9 - 9.6 s
Model Year 2,024 - 2,026
Torque 300 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4
Model Seal U
Modell Seal U, Seal U DM-i
CO2 Efficiency Class A, B
Trim Level Comfort, Design, Boost, Design AWD
Power kW 160 - 238 kW
co2 0 - 71 g/km
Engine capacity 1,497 - 1,498 cm3
Curb weight 1,940 - 2,147 kg
Trunk capacity 425 - 552 L
Width 1,890 mm
Brand BYD
Payload 410 kg
Variant DM-i

details

BYD Seal U as a suitable alternative to Ford Kuga

Comparing the BYD Seal U and the Ford Kuga means weighing a sleek, tech‑forward electric from BYD against Ford’s practical compact crossover—their strengths point to very different priorities. I’ll look at performance, range/fuel economy, interior space, practicality and running costs to help you pick the one that suits your needs.

The BYD Seal U is a sleek electric fastback that blends sporty styling with a roomy, tech-focused interior, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want electric performance without sacrificing comfort. It delivers a smooth, composed ride and intuitive features, positioning it as a practical yet modern option in the EV market.

Quick data check: BYD Seal U

barely cheaper
noticeably lighter
clearly more power
clearly more electric range
clearly quicker 0–100 km/h

Compare directly with BYD Seal U

from £43,700

Mazda CX-60

Price 43,700 - 57,900 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP 200 - 327 HP
Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Electric Range 63 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.8 - 8.4 s
Model Year 2025
Torque 450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4 - 6
Model CX-60
Modell CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV, CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D 200, CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D 254
CO2 Efficiency Class B, D, E
Trim Level Prime-Line AWD Automatik, Exclusive-Line AWD Automatik, Prime-Line Automatik, Exclusive-Line Automatik, Homura AWD Automatik, Takumi AWD Automatik, Homura Plus AWD Automatik, Takumi Plus AWD Automatik, Homura Automatik, Takumi Automatik
Power kW 147 - 241 kW
co2 85 - 137 g/km
Engine capacity 2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Curb weight 1,890 - 2,055 kg
Trunk capacity 570 L
Width 1,890 mm
Brand Mazda
Payload 581 - 612 kg

details

Mazda CX-60 as a suitable alternative to Ford Kuga

The Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-60 take different approaches to the family SUV: the Kuga focuses on practicality, value and efficient powertrains, while the CX-60 aims for a more premium feel with stronger driving dynamics and a refined cabin. Choose the Kuga for everyday versatility and lower running costs; pick the CX-60 if you want a more composed ride, better materials and a more upscale driving experience.

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-60

clearly cheaper
clearly more efficient
marginally more electric range
clearly lighter
clearly more power
clearly quicker 0–100 km/h

Compare directly with Mazda CX-60

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Ford Kuga head-to-head against similar models.

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.