Mitsubishi Colt alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Mitsubishi Colt, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.

Mitsubishi Colt

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Mitsubishi Colt and are good next research steps.

from £11,600
Space Star

Mitsubishi Space Star

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 71 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.5 L/100km

Mitsubishi Space Star as a suitable alternative to Mitsubishi Colt

In the competitive subcompact segment, the Mitsubishi Colt and Mitsubishi Space Star offer unique appeals to different drivers. The Colt shines with its sporty design and responsive handling, making it an exciting choice for urban driving. Meanwhile, the Space Star prioritizes practicality and fuel efficiency, making it an excellent option for budget-conscious consumers seeking everyday reliability.

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

Quick data check: Mitsubishi Space Star

  • clearly more power
  • slightly more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
  • significantly cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
from £14,200
2

Mazda 2

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 75 - 115 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.7 - 5.4 L/100km

Quick data check: Mazda 2

  • moderately more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • markedly more trunk space
  • markedly cheaper
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
from £11,000
Sandero

Dacia Sandero

  • Engine Type : Petrol, LPG
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 67 - 122 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.3 - 7.2 L/100km

Quick data check: Dacia Sandero

  • a bit more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly more trunk space
  • considerably cheaper
  • marginally lighter
from £32,600
A Class

Mercedes A Class

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 421 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.3 - 9 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 85 km

Quick data check: Mercedes A Class

  • considerably cheaper
  • clearly lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
  • substantially more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
from £17,100
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.1 - 5.1 L/100km

Quick data check: Renault Clio

  • only slightly lighter
  • a bit more trunk space
  • marginally cheaper
  • very slightly more power
  • barely more efficient
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km

Ford Puma as a suitable alternative to Mitsubishi Colt

In the competitive subcompact segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and impressive handling, making it a joy to drive on both city streets and winding country roads. In contrast, the Mitsubishi Colt offers a more practical approach, boasting spacious interiors and a reputation for reliability that appeals to budget-conscious consumers. While the Puma appeals to those seeking flair and performance, the Colt delivers solid functionality, making this comparison a matter of personal preference and lifestyle needs.

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

Quick data check: Ford Puma

  • markedly cheaper
  • visibly more efficient
  • somewhat lighter
  • a bit more power
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.