Compare performance (280 HP vs 212 HP), boot space and price (26100 £ vs 27400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Junior or BYD Atto 2?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Alfa Romeo Junior has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 26100 £ , while the BYD Atto 2 costs 27400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1320 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alfa Romeo Junior: with 15.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s slight more efficient than the BYD Atto 2 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.70 kWh.
As for electric range, the BYD Atto 2 performs hardly perceptible better – achieving up to 430 km, about 20 km more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Junior has a noticeable edge – offering 280 HP compared to 212 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Junior is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 5.90 s, while the BYD Atto 2 takes 7.50 s. That’s about 1.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Alfa Romeo Junior performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 206 km/h, while the BYD Atto 2 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 46 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Alfa Romeo Junior pulls a bit stronger with 345 Nm compared to 310 Nm. That’s about 35 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alfa Romeo Junior is hardly perceptible lighter – 1380 kg compared to 1510 kg. The difference is around 130 kg.
In terms of boot space, the BYD Atto 2 offers hardly perceptible more room – 450 L compared to 415 L. That’s a difference of about 35 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BYD Atto 2 performs barely noticeable better – up to 1340 L, which is about 60 L more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.
When it comes to payload, BYD Atto 2 slightly takes the win – 490 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.
The Alfa Romeo Junior stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.
detailsThe Atto 2 is making waves in the electric vehicle market with its sleek design and impressive range. This innovative model combines cutting-edge technology with captivating aesthetics, making it a standout choice for eco-conscious drivers. With its spacious interior and advanced features, the Atto 2 offers both comfort and convenience for everyday use.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
26100 - 41600 £
|
Price
27400 - 36000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
|
Electric Range
40 - 430 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 119 g/km
|
co2
0 - 41 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 - 45 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1380 - 1689 kg
|
Curb weight
1510 - 1720 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
|
Trunk capacity
400 - 450 L
|
|
Length
4173 mm
|
Length
4310 mm
|
|
Width
1781 mm
|
Width
1830 mm
|
|
Height
1505 - 1538 mm
|
Height
1675 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1205 - 1280 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1340 L
|
|
Payload
390 - 420 kg
|
Payload
260 - 490 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 280 HP
|
Power HP
166 - 212 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 9.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 310 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
122 - 156 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, B
|
|
Brand
Alfa Romeo
|
Brand
BYD
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.