Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Alfa Romeo Junior or Mazda CX-60?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Alfa Romeo Junior has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25700 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 16234 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Alfa Romeo Junior with 4.80 L. The difference is about 3.40 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Alfa Romeo Junior performs clearly better – achieving up to 410 km, about 346 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a a bit edge – offering 327 HP compared to 280 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Alfa Romeo Junior takes 5.90 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Alfa Romeo Junior tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 13 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls evident stronger with 550 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 205 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alfa Romeo Junior is evident lighter – 1380 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 510 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers distinct more room – 570 L compared to 415 L. That’s a difference of about 155 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs evident better – up to 1726 L, which is about 446 L more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 evident takes the win – 612 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 192 kg.
The Mazda CX-60 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.
detailsThe Mazda CX-60 exudes a sense of elegance and sophistication with its sleek design and refined styling. Inside, the cabin offers a harmonious blend of comfort and advanced technology, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience. On the road, the CX-60 delivers impressive performance and handling, making it a standout choice for those who appreciate driving dynamics.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25700 - 41600 £
|
Price
41900 - 56800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 119 g/km
|
co2
31 - 139 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 - 45 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1380 - 1689 kg
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
4173 mm
|
Length
4745 mm
|
|
Width
1781 mm
|
Width
1890 mm
|
|
Height
1505 - 1538 mm
|
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1205 - 1280 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
|
|
Payload
390 - 420 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 280 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
100 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Alfa Romeo
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.