Alfa Romeo VS Ford

VS

The Alfa Romeo Junior offers a stylish blend of Italian design and spirited performance, appealing to enthusiasts looking for a dynamic driving experience. In contrast, the Ford Puma impresses with its practicality and advanced technology features, making it a versatile choice for everyday use. While the Junior captivates with its heritage and sportiness, the Puma excels in comfort and reliability, catering to different segments of the market.

Alfa Romeo

details

Ford

details

As the automotive world shifts towards electrification and sustainable driving experiences, the competition in the SUV segment has become fierce. In this comparison, we take a closer look at two intriguing contenders: the Alfa Romeo Junior and the Ford Puma. Both SUVs embody unique characteristics, blending technology, performance, and comfort. Let’s explore their technical aspects and innovations to see how they stack up against each other.

Design and Dimensions

Both the Alfa Romeo Junior and the Ford Puma exhibit contemporary SUV designs that are not only stylish but also practical. The Junior measures 4173 mm in length, 1781 mm in width, and stands 1533 mm tall, showcasing its compact and sporty demeanor. On the other hand, the Puma is slightly larger, ranging from 4186 to 4226 mm in length with a width of 1805 mm and a height of 1550 mm, providing a more robust presence on the road.

Engines and Performance

When it comes to engine options, the Junior offers both electric and petrol MHEV variants, with power outputs reaching up to 280 HP. Its 0-100 km/h acceleration time can be as quick as 5.9 seconds for the more powerful electric model, making it a strong performer. In contrast, the Ford Puma presents a range of petrol MHEV engines with up to 160 HP, achieving a respectable 0-100 km/h in just 7.4 seconds with its most powerful variant.

The Junior stands out with its electric options, providing an electric range of up to 410 km, alongside a battery capacity of 51 kWh. This positions it well for environmentally conscious drivers. The Puma, however, focuses solely on petrol engines, with fuel consumption figures ranging from 5.4 to 6 L/100 km, highlighting its efficiency among traditional combustion engines.

Transmission and Handling

Both models are equipped with user-friendly transmissions. The Alfa Romeo Junior comes with an automatic transmission, featuring a dual-clutch setup for smooth gear changes, while the Puma offers options for both manual and automatic transmissions, catering to a variety of driver preferences. Both vehicles employ front-wheel drive systems, which provide adequate handling and stability in various driving conditions.

Interior and Comfort

The interior layout of both SUVs is designed to provide comfort for five passengers. The Junior boasts a trunk capacity of 400 L, while the Puma offers slightly more space at 456 L, making it a more practical choice for families or those needing extra storage. Both design approaches emphasize an ergonomic and modern dashboard, integrating the latest technology for infotainment and connectivity.

Safety and Technology

In terms of safety, both cars are equipped with advanced features, although specific ratings may vary. The Junior and Puma are expected to come with standard safety technologies such as adaptive cruise control, lane assist, and automatic emergency braking, enhancing driver and passenger safety.

Environmental Impact

With increasing emphasis on sustainability, the Alfa Romeo Junior scores high for its electric capabilities and lower CO2 emissions of 0 g/km for the electric variant. In contrast, the Ford Puma has CO2 emissions ranging from 121 to 136 g/km, falling into a less favorable efficiency class than the Junior.

Conclusion

Choosing between the Alfa Romeo Junior and the Ford Puma ultimately comes down to the individual’s driving preferences and environmental concerns. The Junior edges out with its electrification options and robust performance metrics, appealing to tech-savvy drivers looking for a sustainable future. On the other hand, the Puma presents a reliable and fuel-efficient option for those who still prefer the traditional petrol experience. Both models have their unique attributes, making them worthy competitors in today’s SUV market.

Alfa Romeo
Ford

Costs and Consumption

Price
about 25300 - 41600 £
Price
about 24800 - 34800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 19 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.7 kWh
Electric Range
315 - 410 km
Electric Range
364 - 376 km
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 51 kWh
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
co2
0, 103, 119 g/km
co2
121, 129, 128, 136, 0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
44 - 45 L
Fuel tank capacity
42 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1380 - 1635 kg
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Length
4173 mm
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Width
1781 mm
Width
1805 mm
Height
1505 - 1538 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Payload
390 - 450 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automat. Schaltgetriebe (Doppelkupplung)
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
136 - 280 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
100 - 207 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Top speed
150 - 206 km/h
Top speed
160 - 210 km/h

General

Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
Brand
Alfa Romeo
Brand
Ford

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.