VS

Alfa Romeo Junior vs Ford Puma comparison

Compare performance (280 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (26,100 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Junior or Ford Puma?

Alfa Romeo Junior vs Ford Puma: Key differences

Alfa Romeo Junior

4.9 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • slightly more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • only slightly lighter
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Junior

As the automotive world shifts towards electrification and sustainable driving experiences, the competition in the SUV segment has become fierce. In this comparison, we take a closer look at two intriguing contenders: the Alfa Romeo Junior and the Ford Puma. Both SUVs embody unique characteristics, blending technology, performance, and comfort. Let’s explore their technical aspects and innovations to see how they stack up against each other.

Puma

Design and Dimensions

Both the Alfa Romeo Junior and the Ford Puma exhibit contemporary SUV designs that are not only stylish but also practical. The Junior measures 4173 mm in length, 1781 mm in width, and stands 1533 mm tall, showcasing its compact and sporty demeanor. On the other hand, the Puma is slightly larger, ranging from 4186 to 4226 mm in length with a width of 1805 mm and a height of 1550 mm, providing a more robust presence on the road.

Junior

Engines and Performance

When it comes to engine options, the Junior offers both electric and petrol MHEV variants, with power outputs reaching up to 280 HP. Its 0-100 km/h acceleration time can be as quick as 5.9 seconds for the more powerful electric model, making it a strong performer. In contrast, the Ford Puma presents a range of petrol MHEV engines with up to 160 HP, achieving a respectable 0-100 km/h in just 7.4 seconds with its most powerful variant.

The Junior stands out with its electric options, providing an electric range of up to 410 km, alongside a battery capacity of 51 kWh. This positions it well for environmentally conscious drivers. The Puma, however, focuses solely on petrol engines, with fuel consumption figures ranging from 5.4 to 6 L/100 km, highlighting its efficiency among traditional combustion engines.

Puma

Transmission and Handling

Both models are equipped with user-friendly transmissions. The Alfa Romeo Junior comes with an automatic transmission, featuring a dual-clutch setup for smooth gear changes, while the Puma offers options for both manual and automatic transmissions, catering to a variety of driver preferences. Both vehicles employ front-wheel drive systems, which provide adequate handling and stability in various driving conditions.

Junior

Interior and Comfort

The interior layout of both SUVs is designed to provide comfort for five passengers. The Junior boasts a trunk capacity of 400 L, while the Puma offers slightly more space at 456 L, making it a more practical choice for families or those needing extra storage. Both design approaches emphasize an ergonomic and modern dashboard, integrating the latest technology for infotainment and connectivity.

Puma

Safety and Technology

In terms of safety, both cars are equipped with advanced features, although specific ratings may vary. The Junior and Puma are expected to come with standard safety technologies such as adaptive cruise control, lane assist, and automatic emergency braking, enhancing driver and passenger safety.

Environmental Impact

With increasing emphasis on sustainability, the Alfa Romeo Junior scores high for its electric capabilities and lower CO2 emissions of 0 g/km for the electric variant. In contrast, the Ford Puma has CO2 emissions ranging from 121 to 136 g/km, falling into a less favorable efficiency class than the Junior.

Conclusion

Choosing between the Alfa Romeo Junior and the Ford Puma ultimately comes down to the individual’s driving preferences and environmental concerns. The Junior edges out with its electrification options and robust performance metrics, appealing to tech-savvy drivers looking for a sustainable future. On the other hand, the Puma presents a reliable and fuel-efficient option for those who still prefer the traditional petrol experience. Both models have their unique attributes, making them worthy competitors in today’s SUV market.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Junior

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma is marginally cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Alfa Romeo Junior costs 26,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,186 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Alfa Romeo Junior uses 4.8 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is slightly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 15.1 kWh/100km for the Alfa Romeo Junior. That’s a difference of about 2.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 7 km more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.

Puma

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Junior offers visibly more power – delivering 280 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 112 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Junior is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alfa Romeo Junior delivers a bit more torque with 345 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm more.

Junior

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is only slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,380 kg. The difference is around 64 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers visibly more boot space – 523 L compared to 415 L. That’s a difference of about 108 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries moderately more – 469 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alfa Romeo Junior is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £26,100
Junior

Alfa Romeo Junior

  • Engine Type Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 146 - 280 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.8 - 5.4 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.1 - 17.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 344 - 410 km
details
Alfa Romeo Junior
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alfa Romeo Junior

The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.

details
AlfaRomeoJunior-Exterieur
AlfaRomeoJunior-Exterieur
AlfaRomeoJunior-Interieur

Reviews Alfa Romeo Junior

4.9 (7 Reviews)
rate
Jerzy
9 May 2026, 04:07:35

The car is a pleasure to drive — you don't want to get out. The navigation guides excellently, but Polish names are mispronounced. The car doesn't have cornering lights. The matrix headlights are very good.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona are two of the most popular compact crossovers, combining practical interiors, elevated driving positions and city-friendly footprints. Choosing between the Puma’s engaging handling and efficient mild-hybrid options and the Kona’s broader engine range and tech-rich …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
CUPRA Raval
VS
Comparing the Ford Puma and the Cupra Raval pits a practical, compact crossover known for clever packaging and everyday efficiency against a bolder, sport-oriented compact that emphasizes sharper handling, tech and aggressive styling. Your choice comes down to whether you prioritise comfort, …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Alfa Romeo Tonale
VS
Here’s a concise head-to-head: the Alfa Romeo Junior, a vintage compact coupe prized for its lightness and analogue driving character, versus the Alfa Romeo Tonale, Alfa’s contemporary compact SUV focused on technology, comfort and efficiency. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, running costs …
Ford Puma
Lexus LBX
VS
Small crossover clash: the Ford Puma brings cheeky driving dynamics and clever practicality, while the Lexus LBX counters with quiet refinement and premium flair. Pick the Puma if you want fun and value, choose the LBX if you crave comfort and a luxury badge — either way, you’ll be trading up from …
Ford Puma
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
Price
26,100 - 41,600 £
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 119 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,689 kg
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,781 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
390 - 420 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
146 - 280 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
107 - 207 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
Brand
Alfa Romeo
Brand
Ford
What drivetrain options does the Alfa Romeo Junior have?

The Alfa Romeo Junior is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.