Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alfa Romeo Junior vs Ford Puma - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (280 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (26100 £ vs 24800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Junior or Ford Puma?
Junior
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Alfa Romeo Junior costs 26100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1329 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Alfa Romeo Junior manages with 4.80 L and is therefore somewhat more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.60 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s slightly more efficient than the Alfa Romeo Junior with 15.10 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2 kWh.
As for electric range, the Alfa Romeo Junior performs slight better – achieving up to 410 km, about 34 km more than the Ford Puma.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Junior has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 280 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 112 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Junior is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 5.90 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs minimal better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Alfa Romeo Junior tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Alfa Romeo Junior pulls to a small extent stronger with 345 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Junior
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is minimal lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1380 kg. The difference is around 64 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers evident more room – 523 L compared to 415 L. That’s a difference of about 108 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs slight better – up to 1283 L, which is about 3 L more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma a bit takes the win – 469 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Alfa Romeo Junior proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Alfa Romeo Junior is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £26,100
Alfa Romeo Junior
Alfa Romeo Junior
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Alfa Romeo Junior
5 (1 Reviews)
The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.
details
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Alfa Romeo Junior
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
26100 - 41600 £
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 119 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 - 45 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1380 - 1689 kg
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
4173 mm
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
|
Width
1781 mm
|
Width
1805 mm
|
|
Height
1505 - 1538 mm
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1205 - 1280 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
|
Payload
390 - 420 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 280 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
107 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
|
Brand
Alfa Romeo
|
Brand
Ford
|
What drive types are available for the Alfa Romeo Junior?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.