VS

Ford Puma vs BYD Dolphin Surf – Which model is better for everyday use?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or BYD Dolphin Surf?

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Battle of Innovators: Ford Puma vs. BYD Dolphin Surf

As the automotive industry shifts gears toward sustainability and tech-savvy innovations, the Ford Puma and BYD Dolphin Surf stand at the forefront of this electrifying evolution. Both vehicles bring unique features and compelling performances to the eco-friendly auto market. Let's dive into the technical marvels and innovative aspects these contenders bring to the road.

The Power Dynamics

Unpacking under the hood, the Ford Puma offers a blend of petrol MHEV and electric powertrains, with horsepower ranging from 125 to 168 HP. It pairs these options with either a manual or dual-clutch automatic transmission. The Puma has an impressive electric range, reaching up to 376 km, underlining its versatility in both urban and highway travels. For those considering emissions, its CO2 efficiency class proudly ranges all the way to class A.

In contrast, the BYD Dolphin Surf is purely electric, with two power outputs: 88 HP and 156 HP. A hallmark of simplicity, the Dolphin employs a reduction gearbox for hassle-free automatic transmission, making the drive smooth and efficient. Despite being a hatchback, the Dolphin takes center stage with its nimble electric range of up to 322 km while contributing zero emissions, an attractive prospect for environmentally conscious drivers.

A Closer Look at Performance

Acceleration and speed are pivotal for car enthusiasts to consider. The Ford Puma exhibits variability, with an acceleration from 0-100 km/h between 7.4 to 9.8 seconds. Its maximum speed can soar up to 210 km/h, making it not just a competent urban car but a feisty highway companion as well. Torque figures for the Puma sit comfortably at up to 290 Nm, ensuring robust performance where it counts.

The Dolphin Surf, while slightly less aggressive, maintains a commendable acceleration, clocking 0-100 km/h at 9.1 seconds in its quicker configuration. With a top speed capped at 150 km/h, the Dolphin remains a relaxed cruiser, perfect for city and suburban life. Its torque maxes at 220 Nm, a significant figure for its size, promising agility and swift maneuvering in traffic.

Design and Dimensions

In the world of crossovers, the Ford Puma commands presence with its SUV stature, measuring up to 4226 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and 1555 mm in height. Accommodating five passengers, the Puma offers a generous trunk capacity up to 523 liters, making it an ideal choice for both family outings and adventures.

The BYD Dolphin Surf, compact yet charismatic, stands at 3990 mm in length, 1720 mm in width, and 1590 mm in height. Designed to seat four, this hatchback isn't shy on space with a 308-liter trunk, providing adequate room for daily commutes or weekend getaways.

Efficiency and Innovations

The Ford Puma gleams with eco-friendly credentials, offering a fuel consumption as low as 5.4 L/100km and electric consumption starting at 13.1 kWh/100km. It embraces modernity with a range of technological advancements, catering to the tech-savvy audience keen on integrating seamless digital experiences with their driving habits.

BYD's Dolphin Surf stands tall with its efficient consumption of up to 16 kWh/100km, embodying a leap towards sustainable driving. It integrates BYD's cutting-edge electric vehicle technology, ensuring a commitment to lower operational costs and higher eco-awareness, making it a profound choice for those looking to leave little to no carbon footprint.

Conclusion

In a clash of innovation vs. practicality, the Ford Puma and BYD Dolphin Surf both deliver compelling narratives to modern drivers. Where the Puma balances performance and versatility, the Dolphin underscores simplicity and sustainability. Deciding between these two is a matter of personal preference and lifestyle needs, but one certainty exists—both models symbolize the exciting future of automotive excellence and ecological harmony.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

BYD Dolphin Surf has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 19700 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 5066 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s slightly more efficient than the BYD Dolphin Surf with 15.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.40 kWh.

As for range, the Ford Puma performs somewhat better – achieving up to 376 km, about 54 km more than the BYD Dolphin Surf.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 168 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the BYD Dolphin Surf takes 9.10 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs noticeable better – reaching 210 km/h, while the BYD Dolphin Surf tops out at 150 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 290 Nm compared to 220 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Ford Puma offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.

In curb weight, BYD Dolphin Surf is hardly perceptible lighter – 1294 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 22 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers significantly more room – 523 L compared to 308 L. That’s a difference of about 215 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs somewhat better – up to 1283 L, which is about 246 L more than the BYD Dolphin Surf.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma clearly perceptible takes the win – 469 kg compared to 344 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Ford Puma proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Puma is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £24,800
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.1 - 13.9 kWh
  • Electric Range : 361 - 376 km

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details

BYD Dolphin Surf

The BYD Dolphin Surf is an intriguing model that combines sleek design with modern electric technology, making it an appealing choice for urban commuters seeking sustainability and style. Its dynamic exterior design is complemented by an interior that prioritizes comfort and functionality, reflecting the brand's commitment to innovation. The model also offers impressive handling and a smooth driving experience, embodying the shift towards eco-friendly transportation.

details
Ford Puma
BYD Dolphin Surf
Puma

Costs and Consumption

Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
19700 - 26600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 - 16 kWh
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
220 - 322 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1294 - 1390 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
308 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
3990 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1720 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1590 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1037 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
344 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
88 - 156 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 12.1 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
150 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
175 - 220 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
65 - 115 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
BYD
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.