Compare performance (168 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 19,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or BYD Dolphin Surf?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
As the automotive industry shifts gears toward sustainability and tech-savvy innovations, the Ford Puma and BYD Dolphin Surf stand at the forefront of this electrifying evolution. Both vehicles bring unique features and compelling performances to the eco-friendly auto market. Let's dive into the technical marvels and innovative aspects these contenders bring to the road.
Unpacking under the hood, the Ford Puma offers a blend of petrol MHEV and electric powertrains, with horsepower ranging from 125 to 168 HP. It pairs these options with either a manual or dual-clutch automatic transmission. The Puma has an impressive electric range, reaching up to 376 km, underlining its versatility in both urban and highway travels. For those considering emissions, its CO2 efficiency class proudly ranges all the way to class A.
In contrast, the BYD Dolphin Surf is purely electric, with two power outputs: 88 HP and 156 HP. A hallmark of simplicity, the Dolphin employs a reduction gearbox for hassle-free automatic transmission, making the drive smooth and efficient. Despite being a hatchback, the Dolphin takes center stage with its nimble electric range of up to 322 km while contributing zero emissions, an attractive prospect for environmentally conscious drivers.
Acceleration and speed are pivotal for car enthusiasts to consider. The Ford Puma exhibits variability, with an acceleration from 0-100 km/h between 7.4 to 9.8 seconds. Its maximum speed can soar up to 210 km/h, making it not just a competent urban car but a feisty highway companion as well. Torque figures for the Puma sit comfortably at up to 290 Nm, ensuring robust performance where it counts.
The Dolphin Surf, while slightly less aggressive, maintains a commendable acceleration, clocking 0-100 km/h at 9.1 seconds in its quicker configuration. With a top speed capped at 150 km/h, the Dolphin remains a relaxed cruiser, perfect for city and suburban life. Its torque maxes at 220 Nm, a significant figure for its size, promising agility and swift maneuvering in traffic.
In the world of crossovers, the Ford Puma commands presence with its SUV stature, measuring up to 4226 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and 1555 mm in height. Accommodating five passengers, the Puma offers a generous trunk capacity up to 523 liters, making it an ideal choice for both family outings and adventures.
The BYD Dolphin Surf, compact yet charismatic, stands at 3990 mm in length, 1720 mm in width, and 1590 mm in height. Designed to seat four, this hatchback isn't shy on space with a 308-liter trunk, providing adequate room for daily commutes or weekend getaways.
The Ford Puma gleams with eco-friendly credentials, offering a fuel consumption as low as 5.4 L/100km and electric consumption starting at 13.1 kWh/100km. It embraces modernity with a range of technological advancements, catering to the tech-savvy audience keen on integrating seamless digital experiences with their driving habits.
BYD's Dolphin Surf stands tall with its efficient consumption of up to 16 kWh/100km, embodying a leap towards sustainable driving. It integrates BYD's cutting-edge electric vehicle technology, ensuring a commitment to lower operational costs and higher eco-awareness, making it a profound choice for those looking to leave little to no carbon footprint.
In a clash of innovation vs. practicality, the Ford Puma and BYD Dolphin Surf both deliver compelling narratives to modern drivers. Where the Puma balances performance and versatility, the Dolphin underscores simplicity and sustainability. Deciding between these two is a matter of personal preference and lifestyle needs, but one certainty exists—both models symbolize the exciting future of automotive excellence and ecological harmony.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
BYD Dolphin Surf is noticeably cheaper – starting at 19,700 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,209 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is somewhat more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 15.5 kWh/100km for the BYD Dolphin Surf. That’s a difference of about 2.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers visibly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 95 km more than the BYD Dolphin Surf.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers barely more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the BYD Dolphin Surf takes 9.1 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers clearly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 220 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, BYD Dolphin Surf is marginally lighter – 1,294 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 22 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers considerably more boot space – 523 L compared to 308 L. That’s a difference of about 215 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries visibly more – 469 kg compared to 344 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.
The Ford Puma is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
The BYD Dolphin Surf is an intriguing model that combines sleek design with modern electric technology, making it an appealing choice for urban commuters seeking sustainability and style. Its dynamic exterior design is complemented by an interior that prioritizes comfort and functionality, reflecting the brand's commitment to innovation. The model also offers impressive handling and a smooth driving experience, embodying the shift towards eco-friendly transportation.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
19,700 - 26,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 - 16 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
220 - 322 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,294 - 1,390 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
308 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,720 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
344 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
88 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 12.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 220 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
65 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
BYD
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España