Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Junior or Mercedes Vito Transporter?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Alfa Romeo Junior has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25700 £, while the Mercedes Vito Transporter costs 28800 £. That’s a price difference of around 3111 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Alfa Romeo Junior manages with 4.80 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Transporter with 6.80 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alfa Romeo Junior: with 15.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s clearly more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Transporter with 21.20 kWh. That’s a difference of about 6.10 kWh.
As for range, the Mercedes Vito Transporter performs to a small extent better – achieving up to 474 km, about 64 km more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Junior has a somewhat edge – offering 280 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 43 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Alfa Romeo Junior performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 206 km/h, while the Mercedes Vito Transporter tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 66 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes Vito Transporter pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 500 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 155 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alfa Romeo Junior is distinct lighter – 1380 kg compared to 1916 kg. The difference is around 536 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes Vito Transporter performs clearly better – up to 6600 L, which is about 5320 L more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.
When it comes to payload, Mercedes Vito Transporter convincingly takes the win – 884 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 464 kg.
Overall, the Mercedes Vito Transporter shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.
detailsThe Mercedes-Benz Vito Transporter combines practicality with the refined elegance characteristic of its brand. Known for its robust performance, this vehicle offers an impressively versatile interior space, making it ideal for both commercial use and everyday driving. The advanced safety features and modern technological enhancements ensure that the Vito remains a reliable and comfortable choice for drivers.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25700 - 41600 £
|
Price
28800 - 51600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
|
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 119 g/km
|
co2
0 - 222 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 - 45 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1380 - 1689 kg
|
Curb weight
1916 - 2518 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4173 mm
|
Length
4895 - 5390 mm
|
|
Width
1781 mm
|
Width
1928 mm
|
|
Height
1505 - 1538 mm
|
Height
1910 - 1945 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1205 - 1280 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3100 - 6600 L
|
|
Payload
390 - 420 kg
|
Payload
547 - 884 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 280 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
100 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1950 - 1999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Alfa Romeo
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.