Two cars, one duel: Alfa Romeo Junior meets Nissan Townstar Compact Van.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Nissan Townstar Compact Van has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24200 £, while the Alfa Romeo Junior costs 25700 £. That’s a price difference of around 1456 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Alfa Romeo Junior manages with 4.80 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Nissan Townstar Compact Van with 6.60 L. The difference is about 1.80 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alfa Romeo Junior: with 15.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s noticeable more efficient than the Nissan Townstar Compact Van with 18.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.40 kWh.
As for range, the Alfa Romeo Junior performs distinct better – achieving up to 410 km, about 121 km more than the Nissan Townstar Compact Van.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Junior has a clearly edge – offering 280 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 150 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Alfa Romeo Junior performs a bit better – reaching 206 km/h, while the Nissan Townstar Compact Van tops out at 183 km/h. The difference is around 23 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Alfa Romeo Junior pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 345 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alfa Romeo Junior is slight lighter – 1380 kg compared to 1399 kg. The difference is around 19 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Nissan Townstar Compact Van performs convincingly better – up to 4900 L, which is about 3620 L more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.
When it comes to payload, Nissan Townstar Compact Van decisively takes the win – 775 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 355 kg.
The Alfa Romeo Junior proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Alfa Romeo Junior is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.
detailsThe Nissan Townstar offers a modern take on the traditional compact van, perfect for urban deliveries and small business needs. Its sleek exterior design is complemented by a spacious and versatile interior, providing ample room for cargo while ensuring a comfortable driving experience. With advanced technologies integrated for safety and connectivity, the Townstar stands out as a highly practical and efficient choice in its segment.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25700 - 41600 £
|
Price
24200 - 39900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
6.6 - 7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.5 - 20.9 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
|
Electric Range
263 - 289 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 119 g/km
|
co2
0 - 159 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 - 45 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1380 - 1689 kg
|
Curb weight
1399 - 1908 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4173 mm
|
Length
4488 - 4910 mm
|
|
Width
1781 mm
|
Width
1860 mm
|
|
Height
1505 - 1538 mm
|
Height
1822 - 1854 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1205 - 1280 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2100 - 4900 L
|
|
Payload
390 - 420 kg
|
Payload
537 - 775 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 280 HP
|
Power HP
122 - 130 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 - 183 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
100 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
90 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2022 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, A
|
|
Brand
Alfa Romeo
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.