What drivetrain options does the Alfa Romeo Tonale have?

The Alfa Romeo Tonale is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Alfa Romeo Tonale?

Depending on the version, the Alfa Romeo Tonale delivers up to 280 HP.

How much fuel does the Alfa Romeo Tonale use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 1.30 L.

What is the electric driving range of the Alfa Romeo Tonale?

According to WLTP, the Alfa Romeo Tonale can travel up to 62 km on a single charge.

How many kWh does the Alfa Romeo Tonale’s battery hold?

The battery capacity is 12 kWh.

How big is the Alfa Romeo Tonale overall?

Overall, the Alfa Romeo Tonale is 4528 mm long, 1835 mm wide and 1614 mm high.

What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-5 have?

The Mazda CX-5 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Mazda CX-5's engine?

Up to 141 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-5 according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 7 L.

What is the top speed of the Mazda CX-5?

Depending on the model, top speed is 195 km/h.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-5?

Depending on configuration, up to 583 L fit inside.

What are the dimensions of the Mazda CX-5?

The Mazda CX-5 measures 4690 mm long, 1860 mm wide and 1695 mm high.

Alfa Romeo Tonale vs Mazda CX-5 – Which car is better? Specs, differences & prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tonale @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-5 has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 30000 £, while the Alfa Romeo Tonale costs 35000 £. That’s a price difference of around 4971 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Alfa Romeo Tonale manages with 1.30 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L. The difference is about 5.70 L per 100 km.

CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Tonale has a clearly edge – offering 280 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 139 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Tonale is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.20 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.50 s. That’s about 4.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Alfa Romeo Tonale performs barely noticeable better – reaching 212 km/h, while the Mazda CX-5 tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 17 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Alfa Romeo Tonale pulls distinct stronger with 320 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 82 Nm difference.

Tonale @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Alfa Romeo Tonale is minimal lighter – 1600 kg compared to 1629 kg. The difference is around 29 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers a bit more room – 583 L compared to 500 L. That’s a difference of about 83 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 performs clearly perceptible better – up to 2019 L, which is about 469 L more than the Alfa Romeo Tonale.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Alfa Romeo Tonale shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Alfa Romeo Tonale

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Mazda CX-5

3 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-5

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Karoq

VS

The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-5

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-60

VS

In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and …

Costs and Consumption
Price 35000 - 53200 £	Price 30000 - 39500 £
Consumption L/100km 1.3 - 5.6 L	Consumption L/100km 7 - 7.4 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 62 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 12 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 30 - 140 g/km	co2 157 - 168 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 42 - 55 L	Fuel tank capacity 56 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1600 - 1910 kg	Curb weight 1629 - 1671 kg
Trunk capacity 385 - 500 L	Trunk capacity 583 L
Length 4528 mm	Length 4690 mm
Width 1835 mm	Width 1860 mm
Height 1614 mm	Height 1695 mm
Max trunk capacity 1430 - 1550 L	Max trunk capacity 2019 L
Payload 510 - 535 kg	Payload -

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel	Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 130 - 280 HP	Power HP 141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.2 - 10.9 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed 194 - 212 km/h	Max Speed 195 km/h
Torque 240 - 320 Nm	Torque 238 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 96 - 206 kW	Power kW 104 kW
Engine capacity 1332 - 1598 cm3	Engine capacity 2488 cm3