VS

Alpine A110 vs Skoda Fabia comparison

Compare performance (345 HP vs 177 HP), boot space and price (55,200 £ vs 17,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A110 or Skoda Fabia?

Alpine A110 vs Skoda Fabia: Key differences

Alpine A110

  • clearly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Skoda Fabia

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • markedly more efficient
  • only slightly lighter
  • considerably more trunk space
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A110

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Fabia is significantly cheaper – starting at 17,300 £ , while the Alpine A110 costs 55,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 37,937 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Fabia uses 4.9 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Alpine A110 with 6.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.8 L/100km.

Fabia

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A110 offers clearly more power – delivering 345 HP compared to 177 HP. That’s roughly 168 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A110 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Skoda Fabia takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alpine A110 delivers clearly more torque with 420 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 170 Nm more.

A110

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Skoda Fabia offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Fabia is only slightly lighter – 1,143 kg compared to 1,150 kg. The difference is around 7 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Fabia offers considerably more boot space – 380 L compared to 96 L. That’s a difference of about 284 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Fabia carries substantially more – 437 kg compared to 210 kg. That’s a difference of about 227 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Fabia holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,300
Fabia

Skoda Fabia

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 80 - 177 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Fabia
Skoda Scala
VS
Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …
Alpine A110
Ferrari SF90 Roadster
VS
Comparing the lightweight, agile Alpine A110 with the blisteringly fast Ferrari SF90 Spider highlights two very different approaches to sports-car performance and driving pleasure. One is a focused, nimble French two-seater built for cornering finesse; the other is a hybrid Ferrari that pairs …
Alpine A110
Skoda Fabia

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alpine A110

The Alpine A110 is a stunning testament to modern automotive design, seamlessly blending performance with elegance. Its lightweight construction contributes to an exhilarating driving experience, making it a true driver's car. With its distinctive styling and agile handling, the A110 captures the spirit of classic sports cars while embracing contemporary technology.

details
R-DAM_1367620
R-DAM_1367632 (1)
R-DAM_1367638
R-DAM_1367671
R-DAM_1367179

Reviews Alpine A110

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Fabia

The Skoda Fabia is a clever, no-nonsense small car that turns everyday chores into a breeze thanks to smart packaging and a surprisingly roomy cabin. It won’t set your pulses racing, but it’s a consistently sensible choice — reliable, easy to live with and blessed with a few neat tricks that make city life less faff.

details
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116050
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116049
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116061
Der neue SKODA FABIA Detail_116013
Der neue SKODA FABIA Interieur_115896

Reviews Skoda Fabia

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Kamiq comes down to whether you prefer a practical, efficient supermini or a taller, more versatile compact crossover. The Fabia excels for city driving and low running costs, while the Kamiq offers extra interior space, a higher driving position and …
Skoda Fabia
VW Golf
VS
Two icons of the small-car world go head-to-head: the Skoda Fabia, the bargain-minded all-rounder, takes on the VW Golf, the class benchmark for driving refinement and pedigree. We’ll compare space, tech, engines and running costs to tell buyers which one delivers the best balance of value, comfort …
Renault Clio
Skoda Fabia
VS
The Renault Clio and the Skoda Fabia are two of Europe's most sensible superminis, each offering a different balance of style, practicality and running costs. This comparison will help you decide whether the Clio’s polished drive and chic design or the Fabia’s roomier interior and everyday …
SEAT Arona
Skoda Fabia
VS
Choosing between the SEAT Arona and the Skoda Fabia means deciding if you prefer a compact crossover with higher ride height and SUV styling or a practical, roomy hatchback that maximises interior space and efficiency. I’ll compare driving feel, comfort, boot space, running costs and equipment to …
SEAT Ibiza
Skoda Fabia
VS
The SEAT Ibiza brings snap, youthful styling and engaging handling that makes town driving feel like a mini hot hatch, while the Škoda Fabia answers with roomy practicality, clever storage and a smoother, more accomplished everyday ride. Pick the Ibiza if you want flair and fun; choose the Fabia if …
Alpine A110
Aston Martin Vantage
VS
The Alpine A110 and Aston Martin Vantage represent two distinct philosophies: the A110 is a lightweight, mid‑engined French coupe built for agility and precision, while the Vantage is a muscular, front‑engined British sports car that emphasizes power and presence. This comparison will help you …
Hyundai i20
Skoda Fabia
VS
The Hyundai i20 is the sassy, tech-packed choice — peppy engines, crisp looks and a surprisingly upscale cabin for the money — while the Škoda Fabia plays the practical trump card with cavernous boot space, calm manners and a build-for-the-long-haul sensibility. If you want style and gadgetry that …
Skoda Fabia
Toyota Yaris
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Skoda Fabia and Toyota Yaris both demonstrate distinct strengths in the subcompact car segment. The Fabia impresses with its spacious interior and practical design, offering excellent value for budget-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Yaris stands out with its …
Alpine A110
Skoda Fabia

Costs and Consumption
Price
55,200 - 282,900 £
Price
17,300 - 30,500 £
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
152 - 157 g/km
co2
112 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Coupe
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
2
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,150 - 1,194 kg
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,278 kg
Trunk capacity
96 L
Trunk capacity
380 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,798 mm
Width
1,780 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
166 - 210 kg
Payload
402 - 437 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 345 HP
Power HP
80 - 177 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 4.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 15.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
320 - 420 Nm
Torque
93 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
185 - 254 kW
Power kW
59 - 130 kW
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the Alpine A110?

The Alpine A110 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.