In the competitive subcompact segment, the Kia Stonic and Skoda Fabia both offer distinctive styles and features tailored to urban driving. The Stonic impresses with its bold design and extensive customization options, while the Fabia stands out with its spacious interior and practical tech features. Ultimately, choosing between these two popular models hinges on personal preference for aesthetics versus functionality.
When it comes to compact vehicles, the Kia Stonic and the Skoda Fabia are two popular contenders that cater to different preferences while providing a blend of performance, comfort, and innovation. This comparison dives into their technical specifications, driving experiences, and innovative features to better understand which model could be the right choice for you.
The Kia Stonic is classified as an SUV, offering a commanding presence on the road with its sporty design and higher driving position. It measures a length of 4140mm, a width of 1760mm, and a height of 1505mm, giving it a compact yet robust stature.
On the other hand, the Skoda Fabia comes as a hatchback, known for its practicality and elegance. It stands at 4108mm long and 1780mm wide with a height option of 1479mm or 1459mm, depending on the variant. The Fabia's sleek lines and proportions make it an attractive choice for those seeking a more refined look.
Under the hood, the Kia Stonic offers a range of petrol engines with power outputs of 79 HP and 100 HP. It features both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, providing users with smooth shifting and responsive acceleration. The Stonic reaches 0-100 km/h in as little as 11.3 seconds, depending on the engine variant.
In comparison, the Skoda Fabia boasts a more diverse engine lineup, offering configurations from 80 HP to 150 HP. It also provides both manual and automatic transmission options, catering to a broader audience. The most powerful variant of the Fabia can sprint from 0-100 km/h in just 8 seconds, showcasing its sporty credentials.
Fuel efficiency is crucial for many buyers today. The Kia Stonic has a commendable fuel consumption rate ranging from 5.5 to 5.8 L/100 km, depending on the chosen engine, making it a practical option for city driving and longer journeys alike. Emission figures range from 125 to 132 g/km, placing it in the CO2 efficiency class D.
The Skoda Fabia shines in this area with improved figures, consuming between 5.0 and 5.5 L/100 km. Emission levels also reflect efficiency, with CO2 outputs between 112 and 124 g/km, positioning some variants in CO2 efficiency class C, making it a more environmentally-friendly option.
Inside the Kia Stonic, drivers and passengers will appreciate the spacious cabin that comfortably seats five. The trunk capacity of 352 liters offers adequate space for luggage and daily essentials. The vehicle comes equipped with the latest technology, including a touchscreen infotainment system that integrates seamlessly with smartphones.
Meanwhile, the Skoda Fabia excels in interior space with a trunk capacity of 380 liters, providing slightly more room for storage than the Stonic. The cockpit features a modern design with high-quality materials and an intuitive infotainment system, making it user-friendly for all ages.
Both vehicles prioritize safety, featuring advanced driver assistance systems that enhance driving experiences. The Kia Stonic includes features such as lane-keeping assist and forward collision warning, which bolster its safety profile.
Similarly, the Skoda Fabia is equipped with numerous safety technologies, including adaptive cruise control and emergency braking. Both cars have undergone rigorous safety testing, receiving high marks for their robust constructions and safety innovations.
Choosing between the Kia Stonic and the Skoda Fabia ultimately comes down to personal preference and intended use. The Stonic, with its SUV stature and sporty appeal, may attract those seeking a robust vehicle for urban and recreational use. In contrast, the Fabia stands out for its elegant design and practicality, making it an excellent choice for city dwellers who prioritize fuel efficiency and interior space.
Whichever you choose, both models offer a great blend of performance, technology, and safety. Ensure you test drive both to determine which car fits your lifestyle best!
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 19300 - 25400
£
|
Price
about 16600 - 25600
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 5.8
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.5
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
125 - 132
g/km
|
co2
112 - 124
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
45
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
40
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1155 - 1260
kg
|
Curb weight
1116 - 1310
kg
|
Trunk capacity
352
L
|
Trunk capacity
380
L
|
Length
4140
mm
|
Length
4108
mm
|
Width
1760
mm
|
Width
1780
mm
|
Height
1505
mm
|
Height
1459 - 1479
mm
|
Payload
445 - 455
kg
|
Payload
360 - 457
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Schaltgetriebe
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
79 - 100
HP
|
Power HP
80 - 150
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.3 - 14.2
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 15.7
s
|
Max Speed
158 - 179
km/h
|
Max Speed
175 - 225
km/h
|
Torque
113 - 200
Nm
|
Torque
93 - 250
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
58 - 74
kW
|
Power kW
59 - 110
kW
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1197
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498
cm3
|
Top speed
158 - 179
km/h
|
Top speed
175 - 225
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Skoda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.