VS

Hyundai Kona vs Kia Stonic comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 115 HP), boot space and price (23,600 £ vs 20,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Kia Stonic?

Hyundai Kona vs Kia Stonic: Key differences

Hyundai Kona

4.4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Kia Stonic

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Kona

Hyundai Kona VS Kia Stonic — concise comparison

Hyundai Kona VS Kia Stonic make very different promises in the B‑SUV segment. The Kona leans into usable space, calmer long‑distance manners and more varied powertrain choices, while the Stonic emphasises compact agility, a lower entry price and a strong warranty. This piece focuses on how those promises translate into everyday life — steering, luggage, cabin feel and real‑world comfort. Read on to see which car matches your priorities rather than a spec‑sheet winner.

Stonic

Driving character and city behaviour

The Hyundai Kona drives with a relaxed, confidence‑oriented character: light steering, composed damping and a focus on comfort over excitement. The Kia Stonic presents a sharper, more agile personality in town — its steering and chassis feel livelier and more responsive when threading through traffic. That city advantage for the Stonic comes at the cost of a firmer ride that transmits more road imperfections into the cabin, whereas the Kona smooths them out. If you want nimble urban handling pick the Stonic; if you prefer predictable, grown‑up manners choose the Kona.

Kona

Comfort and long‑distance suitability

On longer trips the Hyundai Kona is the more forgiving companion, with quieter refinement and suspension tuning that reduces fatigue over hours. The Kia Stonic’s firmer setup and higher wind and road noise make motorway cruising more tiring, so long journeys feel less relaxed. Kona also gives rear passengers noticeably more room and a more practical boot for luggage, which matters on family trips. For frequent motorway miles the Kona clearly favours comfort; for short commutes the Stonic’s trade‑offs are easier to accept.

Stonic

Practicality and everyday usability

Practicality is where the Kona stakes a clear claim: larger, better‑shaped luggage space and more storage options make daily chores and family loads simpler to manage. The Stonic answers with compact packaging that wins in tight parking and narrow streets, making urban life easier at the expense of cargo flexibility. Kona’s control layout tends toward physical knobs and clear menus that help with quick adjustments on the move, while Stonic’s updated cockpit looks modern but leaves some conveniences option‑dependent. In short, Kona favours families and active lifestyles; Stonic favours budget‑conscious city dwellers.

Kona

Cabin feel and perceived quality

Step into the Hyundai Kona and the cabin feels closer to a premium small SUV thanks to larger displays and more soft‑touch surfaces in higher trims, giving a stronger sense of substance. The Kia Stonic’s facelift freshens the design and tech, but many surfaces remain more utilitarian and remind you of its value orientation. Both cars use modern infotainment and retain useful physical controls, yet the Kona’s finish usually reads as more cohesive on the road. The Stonic balances that with a compelling ownership pitch — lower purchase cost and a long factory warranty that matter to many buyers.

Stonic

Who each car suits best

Deciding between Hyundai Kona and Kia Stonic comes down to which compromises you can live with day to day. Choose the Kona if you prioritise rear‑seat space, a larger boot, quieter motorway behaviour and the flexibility of more efficient powertrain choices for longer trips. Opt for the Stonic if you mainly drive in the city, want the lowest entry cost, enjoy a sprightlier driving feel and value a lengthy factory warranty. Below this editorial section we break down the technical details so you can match those real‑world impressions to concrete figures and options.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kona

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Kia Stonic is a bit cheaper – starting at 20,400 £ , while the Hyundai Kona costs 23,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,180 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Hyundai Kona uses 4.6 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Kia Stonic with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

Stonic

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers substantially more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 89 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Kia Stonic takes 10.7 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Hyundai Kona delivers visibly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm more.

Kona

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Kia Stonic is slightly lighter – 1,205 kg compared to 1,370 kg. The difference is around 165 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers noticeably more boot space – 466 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 114 L.

When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries only slightly more – 490 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,600
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 380 - 510 km
Hyundai Kona
Kia Stonic

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona is a compact crossover that pairs bold styling with practical everyday usability, offering a comfortable cabin and intuitive tech for modern drivers. Available in both conventional and electrified versions, Kona brings lively handling and strong value for buyers who want crossover versatility and standout character.

details

Kia Stonic

The Kia Stonic is a compact crossover that pairs nimble city manners with a surprisingly spacious and comfortable cabin. It’s a practical, well-equipped choice for buyers who value sensible features, approachable styling and easy everyday usability.

details
Hyundai Kona
Kia Stonic

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,600 - 41,900 £
Price
20,400 - 26,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 163 g/km
co2
126 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Curb weight
1,205 - 1,270 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
352 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,825 mm
Width
1,760 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
420 - 490 kg
Payload
440 - 445 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
Power HP
100 - 115 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 12.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
172 - 200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Power kW
74 - 85 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
998 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Kia
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.