VS

Hyundai Kona vs Kia Stonic - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (218 HP vs 115 HP), boot space and price (23100 £ vs 20100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Kia Stonic?

Kona

The Battle of Compact SUVs: Hyundai Kona vs Kia Stonic

When it comes to compact SUVs, the Hyundai Kona and Kia Stonic have emerged as two of the most competitive offerings on the market. Both models showcase innovative engineering, sleek styling, and a host of features designed to meet the needs of modern drivers. In this article, we’ll delve into a comprehensive comparison of these two vehicles, highlighting their technical specifications, innovations, and performance aspects to help potential buyers make informed decisions.

Stonic

Powertrains and Performance

The Hyundai Kona offers a diverse lineup of powertrains that include petrol, full hybrid, and electric options. The petrol variants deliver a range of power from 100 HP up to a robust 218 HP with the electric version boasting a significant 65.4 kWh battery that allows for a remarkable electric range of up to 514 km. Performance-wise, the Kona can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 7.8 seconds for the high-performance models.

In contrast, the Kia Stonic is limited to petrol engine options, which include a mild hybrid variation. The Stonic’s power output peaks at 100 HP, with a focus on efficiency, making it slightly less powerful than its Hyundai counterpart. While the Stonic's acceleration times range from 11.3 seconds to 14.2 seconds, it still manages to offer a respectable performance for city driving and occasional highway cruising.

Kona

Fuel Efficiency and CO2 Emissions

Fuel economy is a significant factor for many SUV buyers, and both the Kona and Stonic perform commendably in this area. The Hyundai Kona exhibits a fuel consumption range of 4.5 to 6.7 L/100 km, depending on the chosen engine and configuration. Its electric variant offers a green alternative with no tailpipe emissions, catering to eco-conscious consumers.

The Kia Stonic fares slightly better in terms of fossil fuel efficiency, showing a consumption range of 5.5 to 5.8 L/100 km. Both vehicles feature competitive CO2 emissions, with the Kona offering configurations that comfortably sit in the A to E emissions class, while the Stonic resides in the D class. This is particularly important for urban drivers who may face surcharges for high-emission vehicles.

Stonic

Dimensions and Practicality

In terms of size, the Hyundai Kona measures 4,350 mm in length, 1,825 mm in width, and stands 1,585 mm high, providing a spacious and practical environment for passengers and cargo alike. It also boasts a trunk capacity of 466 liters, ensuring ample space for daily and recreational use.

The smaller Kia Stonic measures at 4,140 mm in length and 1,760 mm in width, which contributes to its agility in urban settings. However, this compactness does sacrifice some cargo space, with a trunk capacity of 352 liters. Both models can comfortably accommodate five passengers with ease.

Kona

Technological Innovations

Both the Kona and Stonic are equipped with cutting-edge technology features designed to enhance the driving experience. The Hyundai Kona shines with its advanced infotainment system, which includes a high-resolution touchscreen, smartphone integration through Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and a premium audio system in higher trims. Additionally, the Kona also offers safety features such as lane-keeping assist, adaptive cruise control, and a suite of driver-assistance technologies that elevate its appeal for safety-conscious buyers.

Similarly, the Kia Stonic offers a modern infotainment setup with an equally user-friendly interface. However, it may lack some of the advanced driver-assistance offerings found in the Kona but compensates with stylish aesthetics and ergonomic interior design. Both vehicles come equipped with smart tech that includes Bluetooth connectivity and USB ports, ensuring that drivers stay connected on the go.

Stonic

Conclusion: Which SUV Is for You?

In summary, the choice between the Hyundai Kona and the Kia Stonic ultimately comes down to individual preferences and priorities. The Kona is the ideal option for those seeking a more powerful, versatile vehicle with advanced electrification and enhanced technology. Meanwhile, the Stonic presents an attractive choice for buyers prioritizing efficiency and compact urban maneuverability. As compact SUVs continue to gain popularity, both the Kona and Stonic stand out as capable competitors ready to meet customer demands in style and substance.

Hyundai Kona

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Kia Stonic

4.3 (1 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kona

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Kia Stonic has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20100 £ , while the Hyundai Kona costs 23100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2923 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Hyundai Kona manages with 4.60 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Kia Stonic with 5.60 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.

Stonic

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona has a significantly edge – offering 218 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 103 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 7.80 s, while the Kia Stonic takes 10.70 s. That’s about 2.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Hyundai Kona performs somewhat better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Kia Stonic tops out at 182 km/h. The difference is around 28 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Hyundai Kona pulls evident stronger with 265 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Kia Stonic is to a small extent lighter – 1205 kg compared to 1370 kg. The difference is around 165 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers distinct more room – 466 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 114 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Hyundai Kona performs somewhat better – up to 1300 L, which is about 145 L more than the Kia Stonic.

When it comes to payload, Hyundai Kona barely noticeable takes the win – 490 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Hyundai Kona
Kia Stonic

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £23,100
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 218 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 16.8 kWh
  • Electric Range : 377 - 514 km

Hyundai Kona

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.

details

Kia Stonic

4.3 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Kia Stonic is a sprightly compact crossover that mixes city-friendly agility with a cheeky, modern design — perfect for buyers who want style without sacrificing sense. Inside it serves up clever practicality and a bright, well-equipped cabin, making everyday driving feel a bit more fun than it has any right to be.

details
Hyundai Kona
Kia Stonic

Costs and Consumption

Price
23100 - 41600 £
Price
20100 - 26600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 5.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 163 g/km
co2
127 - 133 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1370 - 1773 kg
Curb weight
1205 - 1270 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
352 L
Length
4350 - 4385 mm
Length
4165 mm
Width
1825 mm
Width
1760 mm
Height
1580 - 1585 mm
Height
1520 mm
Max trunk capacity
1300 L
Max trunk capacity
1155 L
Payload
420 - 490 kg
Payload
440 - 445 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
Power HP
100 - 115 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 12.1 s
Max Speed
162 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
179 - 182 km/h
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
172 - 200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
Power kW
74 - 85 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3
Engine capacity
998 cm3

General

Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Kia
Is the Hyundai Kona offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.