@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
@ Audi AG
VS

Alpine A290 vs Audi Q8 e-tron – Which car suits you better?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Audi Q8 e-tron?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Alpine A290 has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Audi Q8 e-tron costs 65100 £. That’s a price difference of around 31886 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s evident more efficient than the Audi Q8 e-tron with 19.70 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.90 kWh.

As for range, the Audi Q8 e-tron performs noticeable better – achieving up to 595 km, about 215 km more than the Alpine A290.

Q8 e-tron @ Audi AG

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q8 e-tron has a decisively edge – offering 503 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 285 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q8 e-tron is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.50 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Audi Q8 e-tron performs somewhat better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q8 e-tron pulls clearly stronger with 973 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 673 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is decisively lighter – 1479 kg compared to 2585 kg. The difference is around 1106 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers decisively more room – 569 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 243 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Audi Q8 e-tron performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1637 L, which is about 531 L more than the Alpine A290.

When it comes to payload, Audi Q8 e-tron evident takes the win – 595 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 124 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Audi Q8 e-tron proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Audi Q8 e-tron is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £65,100
Q8 e-tron @ Audi AG

Audi Q8 e-tron

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 340 - 503 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 19.7 - 26.3 kWh
  • Electric Range : 456 - 595 km

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details

Audi Q8 e-tron

The Q8 e-tron stands out with its striking design and luxurious interior, offering a seamless blend of sophistication and cutting-edge technology. This all-electric SUV not only promises an exhilarating driving experience but also emphasizes sustainability without compromising on performance. With its spacious cabin and advanced infotainment features, the Q8 e-tron is sure to appeal to those seeking both comfort and efficiency in their next vehicle.

details
Alpine A290
Audi Q8 e-tron
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Q8 e-tron @ Audi AG

Costs and Consumption

Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
65100 - 102800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
19.7 - 26.3 kWh
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
456 - 595 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
89 - 106 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
2585 - 2725 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
528 - 569 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
4915 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1937 - 1994 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1617 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
1567 - 1637 L
Payload
471 kg
Payload
515 - 595 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
340 - 503 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
200 - 210 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
664 - 973 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
250 - 370 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2023 - 2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Audi
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.