Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs BMW 2 Series Active Tourer – Which one offers the better deal?
Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Alpine A290 or BMW 2 Series Active Tourer fits your lifestyle better.
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 31000 £, while the Alpine A290 costs 33200 £. That’s a price difference of around 2143 £.
As for range, the Alpine A290 performs significantly better – achieving up to 380 km, about 295 km more than the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer.
2 Series Active Tourer
@ BMW Group Press
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer has a noticeable edge – offering 326 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 108 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 5.50 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 238 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 68 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BMW 2 Series Active Tourer pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 477 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 177 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1545 kg. The difference is around 66 kg.
In terms of boot space, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer offers evident more room – 470 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 144 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer performs noticeable better – up to 1455 L, which is about 349 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, BMW 2 Series Active Tourer hardly perceptible takes the win – 505 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 34 kg.
Who wins the race?
The BMW 2 Series Active Tourer proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £31,000
@ BMW Group Press
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
The BMW 2 Series Active Tourer offers a blend of versatility and modern design, making it an ideal choice for drivers seeking practicality without compromising on style. Its spacious interior and advanced technology features ensure a comfortable and connected driving experience. With a focus on efficiency and performance, this vehicle stands out as a refined option in the compact MPV segment.
details
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
Alpine A290
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ BMW Group Press
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
31000 - 48000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 6.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
85 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.20 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
20 - 140 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
MPV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
1545 - 1920 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
406 - 470 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4386 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1824 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1576 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1370 - 1455 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
465 - 505 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
122 - 326 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
195 - 238 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 477 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
90 - 240 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1499 - 1998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, D
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
BMW
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.