Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs BMW iX1 – Differences & prices compared
Two cars, one duel: Alpine A290 meets BMW iX1.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Alpine A290 has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the BMW iX1 costs 41800 £. That’s a price difference of around 8657 £.
When it comes to electricity consumption, both models perform equally – each averaging 15.80 kWh per 100 km.
As for range, the BMW iX1 performs a bit better – achieving up to 463 km, about 83 km more than the Alpine A290.
iX1
@ BMW Group Press
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW iX1 has a noticeable edge – offering 313 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 95 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW iX1 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 5.60 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 0.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the BMW iX1 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BMW iX1 pulls distinct stronger with 494 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 194 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is distinct lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1940 kg. The difference is around 461 kg.
In terms of boot space, the BMW iX1 offers noticeable more room – 490 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 164 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BMW iX1 performs distinct better – up to 1495 L, which is about 389 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, BMW iX1 minimal takes the win – 495 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 24 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the BMW iX1 shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £41,800
@ BMW Group Press
BMW iX1
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
BMW iX1
The BMW iX1 stands out as a versatile addition to the electric vehicle market, seamlessly combining compact dimensions with advanced electric technology. Its sophisticated design elements and premium interiors ensure a luxurious driving experience, while the vehicle's performance focuses on delivering both efficiency and agility. With enhanced connectivity features and an emphasis on sustainability, this model represents a significant step forward in BMW's commitment to a greener future.
details
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
Alpine A290
BMW iX1
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ BMW Group Press
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
41800 - 54600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 17.1 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
436 - 463 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
64.80 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
1940 - 2085 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
490 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4500 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1845 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1616 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1495 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
495 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 313 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 494 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 230 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2022 - 2023
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
BMW
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.