Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs BMW iX1 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (218 HP vs 313 HP), boot space and price (33200 £ vs 41800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or BMW iX1?
A290
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Alpine A290 has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £ , while the BMW iX1 costs 41800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8657 £.
When it comes to electricity consumption, both models perform equally – each averaging 15.80 kWh per 100 km.
As for electric range, the BMW iX1 performs a bit better – achieving up to 463 km, about 83 km more than the Alpine A290.
iX1
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW iX1 has a noticeable edge – offering 313 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 95 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW iX1 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 5.60 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 0.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the BMW iX1 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BMW iX1 pulls distinct stronger with 494 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 194 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is distinct lighter – 1554 kg compared to 1940 kg. The difference is around 386 kg.
In terms of boot space, the BMW iX1 offers noticeable more room – 490 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 164 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BMW iX1 performs distinct better – up to 1495 L, which is about 389 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, BMW iX1 somewhat takes the win – 495 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 99 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The BMW iX1 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Alpine A290
BMW iX1
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £41,800
BMW iX1
Alpine A290
5 (1 Reviews)
The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.
details
BMW iX1
4.7 (3 Reviews)
The BMW iX1 wraps BMW's electric ambition into a compact SUV package that feels unexpectedly premium, with sharp handling and a crisp, modern cabin that keeps the driver in charge. It's ideal for buyers who want a stylish, quiet daily driver with useful practicality and tech-savvy touches — plus enough character to make the commute feel less like a chore and more like a short joyride.
details
Alpine A290
BMW iX1
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
41800 - 54600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 17.1 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
436 - 463 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
64.80 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1554 kg
|
Curb weight
1940 - 2085 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
490 L
|
|
Length
3990 mm
|
Length
4500 mm
|
|
Width
1820 mm
|
Width
1845 mm
|
|
Height
1520 mm
|
Height
1616 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1495 L
|
|
Payload
396 kg
|
Payload
495 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 313 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 494 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 230 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2022 - 2023
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
BMW
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.