Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Ford Transit Connect – Differences & prices compared
Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Ford Transit Connect?
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Transit Connect has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 26700 £, while the Alpine A290 costs 33200 £. That’s a price difference of around 6447 £.
As for range, the Alpine A290 performs clearly better – achieving up to 380 km, about 262 km more than the Ford Transit Connect.
Transit Connect
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A290 has a evident edge – offering 218 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the Ford Transit Connect takes 11.40 s. That’s about 5 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Transit Connect performs barely noticeable better – reaching 186 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 16 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Transit Connect pulls slightly stronger with 350 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Transit Connect is slight lighter – 1477 kg compared to 1479 kg. The difference is around 2 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Transit Connect performs decisively better – up to 3700 L, which is about 2594 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Ford Transit Connect significantly takes the win – 792 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 321 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Alpine A290 shows itself to be leads convincingly overall and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £33,200
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Ford Transit Connect
The Ford Transit Connect is a versatile compact van that seamlessly combines functionality with a comfortable driving experience. Its spacious interior is designed to accommodate both passengers and cargo, making it an ideal choice for small businesses and active families alike. With its efficient engine and agile handling, the Transit Connect offers a reliable and economical option for urban and suburban driving.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Alpine A290
Ford Transit Connect
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
26700 - 41500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 5.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
118 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
11 - 153 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
32 - 50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
1477 - 1866 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4500 - 4868 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1855 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1856 - 1860 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2500 - 3700 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
602 - 792 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 13.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
280 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Ford
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.