Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Jeep Compass – Which one offers the better deal?
Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Alpine A290 or Jeep Compass?
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Alpine A290 has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Jeep Compass costs 34200 £. That’s a price difference of around 1029 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the Jeep Compass with 17.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.70 kWh.
As for range, the Jeep Compass performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 500 km, about 120 km more than the Alpine A290.
Compass
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Compass has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 240 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 22 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 7.30 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Jeep Compass performs slightly better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Jeep Compass pulls a bit stronger with 345 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is barely noticeable lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1575 kg. The difference is around 96 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Jeep Compass offers convincingly more room – 550 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 224 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Jeep Compass performs distinct better – up to 1387 L, which is about 281 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Alpine A290 slight takes the win – 471 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Jeep Compass proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Jeep Compass is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £34,200
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Jeep Compass
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Jeep Compass
The Jeep Compass combines a rugged aesthetic with modern sophistication, making it a standout choice in the compact SUV segment. Its robust design is complemented by a comfortable interior that offers ample space and cutting-edge technology for a seamless driving experience. Whether tackling urban environments or venturing off-road, the Compass provides versatility and reliability, embodying the adventurous spirit synonymous with the Jeep brand.
details
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Alpine A290
Jeep Compass
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
34200 - 46900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2 - 5.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.50 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
36 - 500 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 133 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
36 - 55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
1575 - 2198 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
420 - 550 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4404 - 4552 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1819 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1629 - 1675 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1230 - 1387 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
465 - 470 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
130 - 240 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
96 - 177 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1469 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B, A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.