Compare performance (225 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Compass or MG ZS?
In a rapidly evolving automotive landscape, compact SUVs have become increasingly popular due to their blend of practicality, style, and capability. This time, we pit the Jeep Compass against the MG ZS, two contenders that offer distinct features and technological innovations aimed at capturing the SUV market.
The Jeep Compass is a modern embodiment of the classic SUV form, showcasing its renowned rugged aesthetics. The Compass stands tall, measuring 4404 mm in length, 1819 mm in width, and offers a height variance between 1629 mm and 1649 mm. The robust frame is complemented by a spacious trunk offering between 420 and 438 liters of cargo space, making it an ideal choice for the adventurous family-oriented buyer.
On the other hand, the MG ZS, with its sleek profile, pushes the envelope of urban SUV design. This model offers a length of 4430 mm and a slight width of 1818 mm, with a comparable height of 1649 mm. Its trunk capacity is slightly more generous, ranging from 443 to 448 liters, appealing to those who prioritize storage space without sacrificing aesthetics.
The Jeep Compass presents a versatile engine lineup, including petrol Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicles (MHEV) and plug-in hybrids, delivering power outputs ranging from 130 HP to 240 HP. Acceleration figures vary from a modest 10.3 seconds to an impressive 7.3 seconds for 0-100 km/h, paired with top speeds reaching up to 200 km/h. Whether opting for front-wheel or all-wheel drive, the Compass offers a drive that can transition from urban streets to rugged terrains effortlessly.
The MG ZS, available in electric, full hybrid, and petrol variants, offers a performance spectrum tailored for eco-conscious drivers. With power outputs from 116 HP to 197 HP and a torque of 280 Nm, the ZS accomplishes 0-100 km/h in approximately 8.6 to 8.7 seconds. The model shines with its electric variant, boasting a significant range of up to 440 km, which serves avid long-distance travelers who prioritize sustainability without compromising on power.
Emphasizing eco-credentials, the Jeep Compass plug-in hybrid models showcase CO2 emissions starting from just 48 g/km, commanding attention with a CO2 efficiency class as high as B. The Compass also provides a practical hybrid consumption rate ranging from 2 to 5.5 L/100km, balancing performance with fuel conservation.
Aligning with global sustainability trends, the MG ZS electric model takes the spotlight with zero tailpipe emissions, underpinning its A-Class CO2 efficiency. Furthermore, with a consumption rate as low as 17.3 kWh/100km for its electric version and up to 6.5 L/100km for petrol, the ZS poses a formidable choice for the eco-conscious driver.
Jeep equips the Compass with numerous technological advancements, including dual-clutch automatic transmissions and intelligent all-wheel drive systems designed for a seamless driving experience across diverse terrains.
In contrast, the MG ZS capitalizes on modern-day connectivity and smarter driving solutions, integrating advanced infotainment systems and driver-assistance technologies, appealing especially to tech-savvy users seeking a dynamic yet connected driving experience.
The choice between the Jeep Compass and the MG ZS ultimately rests on buyer priorities. The Compass impresses with its off-road capabilities and hybrid technology, appealing to the adventurous and versatile drivers. Conversely, the MG ZS stands out with strong electric options and stylish city-friendly design, attracting those who lean towards sustainable technology and everyday practicality. Both models hold their ground firmly in the competitive SUV market, offering commendable features tailored to varied tastes and requirements.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MG ZS is clearly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Jeep Compass costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,209 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Compass uses 3 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Compass offers somewhat more power – delivering 225 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Compass is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Compass delivers significantly more torque with 345 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 197 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is noticeably lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,667 kg. The difference is around 337 kg.
The Jeep Compass is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
|
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 130 g/km
|
co2
115 - 145 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,552 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
Width
1,818 mm
|
|
Height
1,675 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,561 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 188 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
MG
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España