VS

Jeep Compass vs MG ZS comparison

Compare performance (225 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Compass or MG ZS?

Jeep Compass vs MG ZS: Key differences

Jeep Compass

2.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space
details

MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Compass

Battle of the SUVs: Jeep Compass vs. MG ZS

In a rapidly evolving automotive landscape, compact SUVs have become increasingly popular due to their blend of practicality, style, and capability. This time, we pit the Jeep Compass against the MG ZS, two contenders that offer distinct features and technological innovations aimed at capturing the SUV market.

ZS

Design and Dimensions

The Jeep Compass is a modern embodiment of the classic SUV form, showcasing its renowned rugged aesthetics. The Compass stands tall, measuring 4404 mm in length, 1819 mm in width, and offers a height variance between 1629 mm and 1649 mm. The robust frame is complemented by a spacious trunk offering between 420 and 438 liters of cargo space, making it an ideal choice for the adventurous family-oriented buyer.

On the other hand, the MG ZS, with its sleek profile, pushes the envelope of urban SUV design. This model offers a length of 4430 mm and a slight width of 1818 mm, with a comparable height of 1649 mm. Its trunk capacity is slightly more generous, ranging from 443 to 448 liters, appealing to those who prioritize storage space without sacrificing aesthetics.

Compass

Power and Performance

The Jeep Compass presents a versatile engine lineup, including petrol Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicles (MHEV) and plug-in hybrids, delivering power outputs ranging from 130 HP to 240 HP. Acceleration figures vary from a modest 10.3 seconds to an impressive 7.3 seconds for 0-100 km/h, paired with top speeds reaching up to 200 km/h. Whether opting for front-wheel or all-wheel drive, the Compass offers a drive that can transition from urban streets to rugged terrains effortlessly.

The MG ZS, available in electric, full hybrid, and petrol variants, offers a performance spectrum tailored for eco-conscious drivers. With power outputs from 116 HP to 197 HP and a torque of 280 Nm, the ZS accomplishes 0-100 km/h in approximately 8.6 to 8.7 seconds. The model shines with its electric variant, boasting a significant range of up to 440 km, which serves avid long-distance travelers who prioritize sustainability without compromising on power.

ZS

Efficiency and Sustainability

Emphasizing eco-credentials, the Jeep Compass plug-in hybrid models showcase CO2 emissions starting from just 48 g/km, commanding attention with a CO2 efficiency class as high as B. The Compass also provides a practical hybrid consumption rate ranging from 2 to 5.5 L/100km, balancing performance with fuel conservation.

Aligning with global sustainability trends, the MG ZS electric model takes the spotlight with zero tailpipe emissions, underpinning its A-Class CO2 efficiency. Furthermore, with a consumption rate as low as 17.3 kWh/100km for its electric version and up to 6.5 L/100km for petrol, the ZS poses a formidable choice for the eco-conscious driver.

Compass

Technology and Innovations

Jeep equips the Compass with numerous technological advancements, including dual-clutch automatic transmissions and intelligent all-wheel drive systems designed for a seamless driving experience across diverse terrains.

In contrast, the MG ZS capitalizes on modern-day connectivity and smarter driving solutions, integrating advanced infotainment systems and driver-assistance technologies, appealing especially to tech-savvy users seeking a dynamic yet connected driving experience.

ZS

Conclusion

The choice between the Jeep Compass and the MG ZS ultimately rests on buyer priorities. The Compass impresses with its off-road capabilities and hybrid technology, appealing to the adventurous and versatile drivers. Conversely, the MG ZS stands out with strong electric options and stylish city-friendly design, attracting those who lean towards sustainable technology and everyday practicality. Both models hold their ground firmly in the competitive SUV market, offering commendable features tailored to varied tastes and requirements.

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Compass
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Compass target different buyers: the Avenger is a small electric crossover focused on urban efficiency, while the Compass is a larger, more traditional compact SUV with broader engine and capability options. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritise …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Compass

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

MG ZS is clearly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Jeep Compass costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,209 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Compass uses 3 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.

ZS

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Compass offers somewhat more power – delivering 225 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Compass is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Compass delivers significantly more torque with 345 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 197 Nm more.

Compass

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is noticeably lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,667 kg. The difference is around 337 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Jeep Compass offers a bit more boot space – 550 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 107 L.

When it comes to payload, the Jeep Compass carries very slightly more – 473 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 3 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jeep Compass is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
Compass

Jeep Compass

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 145 - 225 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 95 - 500 km
details
Jeep Compass
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jeep Compass

The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.

details
02_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e929f23b1b7_61e99b0034e28
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_002
04_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e80da1eca00_61e99b00bed35
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_009
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_012

Reviews Jeep Compass

2.7 (5 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Constantin
9 Jun 2026, 22:34:01

I replaced my Dacia Jogger with an MG ZS Hybrid and I don't regret it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The MG ZS and the Toyota Yaris Cross are two popular compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV styling without big running costs. The ZS undercuts with strong equipment and roomy cabin for the money, while the Yaris Cross prioritises refinement, hybrid efficiency and Toyota’s proven …
MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
Citroen C3 Aircross
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the Citroën C3 Aircross and the MG ZS comes down to whether you want a quirky, comfort-focused small SUV with clever interior packaging or a straightforward, value-driven package with strong equipment levels. I’ll compare their ride, interior space, efficiency, safety tech and …
MG ZS
Renault Captur
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Captur brings together two popular small SUVs aimed at buyers who want practicality, low running costs and modern equipment. I’ll cut through the marketing to show how they differ in space, comfort, driving feel, technology and running costs so you can choose the one …
Ford Kuga
MG ZS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG ZS are compact SUVs that both promise practicality and value, but they target different priorities: the Kuga leans toward sharper handling, a more refined cabin and a wider range of powertrains, while the ZS focuses on affordability and simple, roomy practicality. Choose the …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
Dacia Duster
MG ZS
VS
The Dacia Duster and MG ZS are two practical, budget-friendly compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want more space and a higher driving position without premium prices. This comparison will help you decide whether the Duster’s rugged simplicity and low running costs or the ZS’s sharper styling and …
Ford Puma
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the MG ZS comes down to whether you prioritise driving dynamics and refinement or space and value. The Puma is a compact, agile crossover with sharper handling, a more upmarket cabin and peppy engines, while the MG ZS trades sportiness for generous interior space, …
Jeep Compass
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 127 g/km
co2
115 - 145 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Trunk capacity
550 L
Trunk capacity
443 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,928 mm
Width
1,818 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
472 - 473 kg
Payload
375 - 470 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Torque
148 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Jeep
Brand
MG
Is the Jeep Compass offered with different drivetrains?

The Jeep Compass is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.