Compare performance (156 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (20,700 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C4 or MG ZS?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Citroen C4 and the MG ZS stand out as top contenders. Both vehicles bring a unique blend of style, performance, and innovation to the table, catering to different aspects of consumer preferences. Let's delve into the details and see how these two giants stack up against each other.
The Citroen C4 boasts modern aesthetics with a length of 4,350mm and a height of 1,525mm, which gives it a sleek, aerodynamic appeal. Its broader width of 1,834mm compared to the MG ZS's 1,818mm slightly enhances its presence on the road. The MG ZS, while slightly more compact with a length of 4,323mm and height of 1,649mm, compensates with a robust and muscular design that exudes confidence.
Citroen C4 is available with a variety of powertrains, including petrol, mild hybrid, and electric versions. The electric variant delivers up to 156 HP with a torque of 270 Nm, enabling a maximum speed of 150 km/h. The petrol engine versions, offering up to 131 HP, ensure a more responsive acceleration, reaching 0-100km/h in as fast as 8 seconds.
On the other hand, the MG ZS also embraces modern electric and hybrid solutions alongside traditional petrol engines. With the electric model reaching up to 197 HP and a torque of 280 Nm, it slightly edges out the C4 in power. This output helps propel the ZS from 0 to 100 km/h in 8.6 seconds, making it a competitive option for those seeking thrilling performance.
Both models cater to environmentally conscious drivers with their electric versions. The Citroen C4 electric variant offers a range of up to 427 km and an impressive consumption rate of about 14.5 kWh/100km. Meanwhile, the MG ZS holds its own with an electric range reaching 440 km, albeit with a slightly higher consumption at 17.3 kWh/100km.
Inside, both models offer ample seating for five passengers, designed for comfort and convenience. Citroen maximizes its versatility with a trunk capacity ranging up to 510 L, whereas the MG ZS offers a slightly lower capacity of 448 L but compensates with its smart use of interior space and advanced connectivity options.
Choosing between the Citroen C4 and the MG ZS depends greatly on what you value most in a vehicle. The Citroen C4 presents itself as a versatile option with a range of powertrains and commendable fuel economy, ideal for those who prioritize efficient urban commuting. In contrast, the MG ZS offers slightly more power and range, appealing to drivers seeking a blend of strong performance and spacious design.
Ultimately, both models showcase the innovation and evolution of the SUV market, and your choice will be largely influenced by specific needs and preferences. Whether it's the sleek elegance of the Citroen C4 or the robust practicality of the MG ZS, both vehicles represent excellence in the current automotive landscape.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
MG ZS is moderately cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Citroen C4 costs 20,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,700 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Citroen C4 uses 4.7 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers visibly more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 41 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Citroen C4 is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Citroen C4 delivers substantially more torque with 270 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 122 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is only slightly lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,403 kg. The difference is around 73 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Citroen C4 offers a bit more boot space – 510 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 67 L.
When it comes to payload, the MG ZS carries somewhat more – 470 kg compared to 406 kg. That’s a difference of about 64 kg.
The Citroen C4 comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Citroën C4 wears its French eccentricity with confidence, pairing bold, sculpted styling with a supremely comfortable ride that turns mundane commutes into a gentler affair. If you value relaxed comfort, clever practicality and a car with personality rather than pretence, the C4 is a charming, sensible choice — and it won't make you miss the usual hot‑hatch theatrics.
details
The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
20,700 - 32,200 £
|
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 4.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 15.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
354 - 427 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 108 g/km
|
co2
115 - 145 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,403 - 1,652 kg
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
380 - 510 L
|
Trunk capacity
443 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,800 - 1,834 mm
|
Width
1,818 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
379 - 406 kg
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
81 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
MG
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España