Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport – Performance, range & efficiency compared
Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Alpine A290 or Land Rover Range Rover Sport?
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Alpine A290 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Land Rover Range Rover Sport costs 78600 £. That’s a price difference of around 45429 £.
As for range, the Alpine A290 performs decisively better – achieving up to 380 km, about 262 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Range Rover Sport
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport has a significantly edge – offering 635 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 417 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 2.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport performs significantly better – reaching 290 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 120 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Sport pulls clearly stronger with 800 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 500 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is decisively lighter – 1479 kg compared to 2390 kg. The difference is around 911 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers decisively more room – 647 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 321 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport performs distinct better – up to 1491 L, which is about 385 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Sport clearly takes the win – 830 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 359 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £78,600
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport exudes a commanding presence, combining luxury with exceptional off-road capabilities. Its sleek, modern design is complemented by a meticulously crafted interior that offers both comfort and advanced technology. With its powerful performance and refined handling, this vehicle is ideal for both urban environments and adventurous terrains.
details
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Alpine A290
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
78600 - 175700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 118 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
31.80 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
61 - 266 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 - 90 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
2390 - 2810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
647 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4946 - 4970 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
2043 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1814 - 1820 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1491 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
640 - 830 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
249 - 635 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
206 - 290 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
570 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
183 - 467 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2997 - 4395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.