VS

Alpine A290 vs Mazda 2 comparison

Compare performance (218 HP vs 115 HP), boot space and price (33,200 £ vs 14,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Mazda 2?

Alpine A290 vs Mazda 2: Key differences

Alpine A290

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly more trunk space
details

Mazda 2

3.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda 2 is significantly cheaper – starting at 14,200 £ , while the Alpine A290 costs 33,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,951 £.

2

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A290 offers significantly more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 103 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Mazda 2 takes 9.1 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alpine A290 delivers significantly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 151 Nm. That’s about 149 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda 2 is considerably lighter – 1,099 kg compared to 1,554 kg. The difference is around 455 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Alpine A290 offers slightly more boot space – 326 L compared to 280 L. That’s a difference of about 46 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda 2 carries only slightly more – 437 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 41 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alpine A290 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,200
A290

Alpine A290

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 177 - 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 364 - 380 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda 2
Mazda 3 Sedan
VS
Choosing between the city‑savvy Mazda2 and the more grown-up Mazda3 Sedan comes down to whether you prioritize low running costs and easy urban manoeuvrability or a roomier cabin, stronger performance and extra tech. I’ll compare the key points — size, engines, economy, equipment and driving feel — …
Alpine A290
CUPRA Raval
VS
The Alpine A290 and CUPRA Raval compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Alpine A290
Mazda 2

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alpine A290

The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.

details
alpinea290

Reviews Alpine A290

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Emin Molu
17 Apr 2026, 21:05:51

excellent handling, excellent damping, excellent noise supression, excellent design.fantastic fun to drive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda 2

The Mazda 2 is a pocket-sized charmer that makes city driving feel light and lively, wrapped in sleek styling that looks right at home on trendy streets. Buyers who want an economical, fun-to-drive hatch with surprisingly grown-up cabin quality will find it hard to resist — it’s the kind of everyday companion that puts a grin on your face every time you head out.

details
2022_mazda2_barcelona_act_04_highres
2022_mazda2_barcelona_act_14_highres
2022_mazda2_barcelona_still_21_highres
2022_mazda2_barcelona_int_01_highres
2022_mazda2_barcelona_int_27_highres

Reviews Mazda 2

3.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
Jose
6 May 2026, 09:05:43

A less stressed engine, quality and simplicity in maintenance.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai i20
Mazda 2
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai i20 and the Mazda2 is largely a question of whether you want practical everyday space and features or a more engaging, stylish small hatchback. The i20 scores for interior room, value and kit, while the Mazda2 favours sharper handling, design and a more premium feel.
Alpine A290
CUPRA Born
VS
The Alpine A290 and CUPRA Born go toe-to-toe as compact electric hatchbacks, each prioritising sporty design and engaging driving dynamics. This comparison looks at performance, range, interior quality and everyday practicality to help you decide which better fits your needs.
Honda Jazz
Mazda 2
VS
The Honda Jazz and Mazda 2 are compact hatchbacks aimed at buyers who value practicality and easy city driving, but they take different approaches — the Jazz emphasizes interior space and versatility while the Mazda 2 focuses on stylish design and engaging handling. This comparison helps you decide …
Mazda 2
VW Polo
VS
Choosing between the Mazda 2 and the VW Polo comes down to whether you prefer a sporty, driver-focused small hatchback or a more refined, practical everyday car. Both deliver good fuel economy and solid build quality, but the Mazda 2 leans toward engaging handling and style while the VW Polo …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Alpine A290
VS
In a thrilling showdown of compact charisma, the Alfa Romeo Junior takes on the Alpine A290 with poise and style. The Junior captivates with its timeless Italian design and sporty dynamics, appealing to those who cherish agile handling and lively road presence. In contrast, the Alpine A290 offers a …
Mazda 2
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Mazda 2 feels like the cheeky pocket rocket of the city, with crisp steering, lively responses and a cabin that punches above its weight for drivers who want a bit of fun on every commute. The Toyota Yaris, meanwhile, plays the practical ace: quieter, more economical (especially in hybrid form) …
Alpine A290
Renault R5
VS
The Alpine A290 is the sharpened, slightly posher take on the same small‑car bones — think keener handling, a firmer chassis and a price that winks “premium.” The Renault 5, by contrast, is the cheeky everyday charmer: more affordable, practical and easygoing, so if you want smiles without a second …
Hyundai i10
Mazda 2
VS
In the competitive segment of compact cars, the Hyundai i10 stands out with its spacious interior and user-friendly technology, making it an excellent choice for urban driving. In contrast, the Mazda 2 offers a sportier driving experience with its dynamic handling and upscale interior finishes. …
Alpine A290
Mazda 2

Costs and Consumption
Price
33,200 - 39,600 £
Price
14,200 - 21,700 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 5.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
107 - 122 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
44 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,554 kg
Curb weight
1,099 - 1,120 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
280 L
Length
-
Length
4,080 mm
Width
1,820 mm
Width
1,695 mm
Height
-
Height
1,515 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
950 L
Payload
396 kg
Payload
420 - 437 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
75 - 115 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 12.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
171 - 200 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
143 - 151 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
55 - 85 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,496 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2023
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Mazda
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

The Alpine A290 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.