@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
VS

Alpine A290 vs Mercedes Vito Transporter – Which model is better for everyday use?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Alpine A290 or Mercedes Vito Transporter?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mercedes Vito Transporter has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28800 £, while the Alpine A290 costs 33200 £. That’s a price difference of around 4389 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s distinct more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Transporter with 21.20 kWh. That’s a difference of about 5.40 kWh.

As for range, the Mercedes Vito Transporter performs somewhat better – achieving up to 474 km, about 94 km more than the Alpine A290.

Vito Transporter @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Vito Transporter has a minimal edge – offering 237 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 19 HP more horsepower.

In terms of top speed, the Alpine A290 performs to a small extent better – reaching 170 km/h, while the Mercedes Vito Transporter tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes Vito Transporter pulls noticeable stronger with 500 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is evident lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1916 kg. The difference is around 437 kg.

In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes Vito Transporter performs significantly better – up to 6600 L, which is about 5494 L more than the Alpine A290.

When it comes to payload, Mercedes Vito Transporter clearly takes the win – 884 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 413 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mercedes Vito Transporter proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mercedes Vito Transporter is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £28,800
Vito Transporter @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Mercedes Vito Transporter

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 102 - 237 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 6.8 - 9.7 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 21.2 - 26.5 kWh
  • Electric Range : 304 - 474 km

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details

Mercedes Vito Transporter

The Mercedes-Benz Vito Transporter combines practicality with the refined elegance characteristic of its brand. Known for its robust performance, this vehicle offers an impressively versatile interior space, making it ideal for both commercial use and everyday driving. The advanced safety features and modern technological enhancements ensure that the Vito remains a reliable and comfortable choice for drivers.

details
Alpine A290
Mercedes Vito Transporter
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Vito Transporter @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
28800 - 51600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 222 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
4
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
1916 - 2518 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
3997 mm
Length
4895 - 5390 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1928 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1910 - 1945 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
3100 - 6600 L
Payload
471 kg
Payload
547 - 884 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1950 - 1999 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.