Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Nissan Juke – Which one offers the better deal?
Two cars, one duel: Alpine A290 meets Nissan Juke.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Nissan Juke has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £, while the Alpine A290 costs 33200 £. That’s a price difference of around 11786 £.
Juke
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A290 has a evident edge – offering 218 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 75 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.10 s. That’s about 3.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Nissan Juke performs minimal better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Alpine A290 pulls distinct stronger with 300 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Nissan Juke is somewhat lighter – 1274 kg compared to 1479 kg. The difference is around 205 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Nissan Juke offers distinct more room – 422 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 96 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Nissan Juke performs a bit better – up to 1305 L, which is about 199 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Alpine A290 slight takes the win – 471 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 44 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Alpine A290 proves to be offers a more balanced package and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Alpine A290 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £33,200
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Nissan Juke
The Nissan Juke stands out with its distinctive design and bold styling, making it a popular choice for those seeking something different on the road. Its interior cleverly combines modern technology with comfort, offering an enjoyable driving experience for both the driver and passengers. Despite its compact size, the Juke provides a surprising amount of space and versatility, making it suitable for urban adventures and weekend getaways alike.
details
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Alpine A290
Nissan Juke
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
21400 - 30100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
107 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
46 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
1274 - 1405 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4210 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1800 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1593 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1237 - 1305 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
405 - 427 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
166 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
200 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.