@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
VS

Alpine A290 vs Peugeot Rifter – Which car suits you better?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Alpine A290 or Peugeot Rifter?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Peugeot Rifter has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23800 £, while the Alpine A290 costs 33200 £. That’s a price difference of around 9351 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the Peugeot Rifter with 18.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.50 kWh.

As for range, the Alpine A290 performs a bit better – achieving up to 380 km, about 41 km more than the Peugeot Rifter.

Rifter @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A290 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 218 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the Peugeot Rifter takes 10.80 s. That’s about 4.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Peugeot Rifter performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 184 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 14 km/h.

Both models offer the same torque – 300 Nm.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Peugeot Rifter offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is barely noticeable lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1561 kg. The difference is around 82 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Peugeot Rifter offers convincingly more room – 1050 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 724 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Peugeot Rifter performs significantly better – up to 3500 L, which is about 2394 L more than the Alpine A290.

When it comes to payload, Peugeot Rifter convincingly takes the win – 814 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 343 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Peugeot Rifter proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Peugeot Rifter is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £23,800
Rifter @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Peugeot Rifter

  • Engine Type : Electric, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 102 - 136 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.6 - 6 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.3 - 19.1 kWh
  • Electric Range : 328 - 339 km

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details

Peugeot Rifter

Der Peugeot Rifter beeindruckt mit seinem robusten Design und seiner hohen Vielseitigkeit, die ihn ideal für Familien und Outdoor-Abenteuer macht. Der Innenraum ist geräumig gestaltet und bietet zahlreiche innovative Technologien, die den Komfort und die Sicherheit der Insassen erhöhen. Zudem überzeugt der Rifter mit seiner hervorragenden Fahrdynamik, die sowohl in der Stadt als auch auf längeren Strecken für ein angenehmes Fahrerlebnis sorgt.

details
Alpine A290
Peugeot Rifter
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Rifter @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
23800 - 36600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 - 19.1 kWh
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
328 - 339 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 158 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
5
Doors
4 - 5
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
1561 - 1941 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
322 - 1050 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
4405 - 4755 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1848 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1818 - 1837 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
3000 - 3500 L
Payload
471 kg
Payload
489 - 814 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 - 13.6 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
132 - 184 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
250 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1499 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E, F
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Peugeot
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.