VS

Alpine A290 vs Skoda Fabia comparison

Compare performance (218 HP vs 177 HP), boot space and price (33,200 £ vs 17,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Skoda Fabia?

Alpine A290 vs Skoda Fabia: Key differences

Alpine A290

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Skoda Fabia

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • markedly lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Fabia is considerably cheaper – starting at 17,300 £ , while the Alpine A290 costs 33,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,866 £.

Fabia

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A290 offers somewhat more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 177 HP. That’s roughly 41 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Skoda Fabia takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alpine A290 delivers slightly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Fabia is markedly lighter – 1,143 kg compared to 1,554 kg. The difference is around 411 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Fabia offers slightly more boot space – 380 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 54 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Fabia carries very slightly more – 437 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 41 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alpine A290 holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,200
A290

Alpine A290

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 177 - 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 364 - 380 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai i20
Skoda Fabia
VS
The Hyundai i20 is the sassy, tech-packed choice — peppy engines, crisp looks and a surprisingly upscale cabin for the money — while the Škoda Fabia plays the practical trump card with cavernous boot space, calm manners and a build-for-the-long-haul sensibility. If you want style and gadgetry that …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Kamiq comes down to whether you prefer a practical, efficient supermini or a taller, more versatile compact crossover. The Fabia excels for city driving and low running costs, while the Kamiq offers extra interior space, a higher driving position and …
Alpine A290
Skoda Fabia

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alpine A290

The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.

details
alpinea290

Reviews Alpine A290

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Emin Molu
17 Apr 2026, 21:05:51

excellent handling, excellent damping, excellent noise supression, excellent design.fantastic fun to drive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Fabia

The Skoda Fabia is a clever, no-nonsense small car that turns everyday chores into a breeze thanks to smart packaging and a surprisingly roomy cabin. It won’t set your pulses racing, but it’s a consistently sensible choice — reliable, easy to live with and blessed with a few neat tricks that make city life less faff.

details
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116050
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116049
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116061
Der neue SKODA FABIA Detail_116013
Der neue SKODA FABIA Interieur_115896

Reviews Skoda Fabia

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Fabia
Skoda Scala
VS
Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …
Kia Stonic
Skoda Fabia
VS
Comparing the Kia Stonic and the Skoda Fabia helps you choose between a small crossover with raised ride height and SUV-like style, and a practical supermini that focuses on interior space, comfort and efficiency. I’ll run through the key differences in driving feel, passenger and luggage room, …
SEAT Arona
Skoda Fabia
VS
Choosing between the SEAT Arona and the Skoda Fabia means deciding if you prefer a compact crossover with higher ride height and SUV styling or a practical, roomy hatchback that maximises interior space and efficiency. I’ll compare driving feel, comfort, boot space, running costs and equipment to …
Alpine A290
Renault R5
VS
The Alpine A290 is the sharpened, slightly posher take on the same small‑car bones — think keener handling, a firmer chassis and a price that winks “premium.” The Renault 5, by contrast, is the cheeky everyday charmer: more affordable, practical and easygoing, so if you want smiles without a second …
Renault Captur
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the world of compact SUVs, the Renault Captur stands tall with its striking design, versatile interior, and a range of efficient engine options, making it a formidable contender. On the other hand, the Skoda Fabia, while traditionally a hatchback, offers a commendable ride quality, practicality, …
Skoda Fabia
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
When comparing the Skoda Fabia and the Toyota Yaris Cross, each model caters to a distinct set of priorities for urban drivers. The Skoda Fabia impresses with its spacious interior and efficient fuel economy, making it a practical choice for those prioritizing affordability and everyday usability. …
Skoda Fabia
VW Golf
VS
Two icons of the small-car world go head-to-head: the Skoda Fabia, the bargain-minded all-rounder, takes on the VW Golf, the class benchmark for driving refinement and pedigree. We’ll compare space, tech, engines and running costs to tell buyers which one delivers the best balance of value, comfort …
Alpine A290
CUPRA Born
VS
The Alpine A290 and CUPRA Born go toe-to-toe as compact electric hatchbacks, each prioritising sporty design and engaging driving dynamics. This comparison looks at performance, range, interior quality and everyday practicality to help you decide which better fits your needs.
Alpine A290
Skoda Fabia

Costs and Consumption
Price
33,200 - 39,600 £
Price
17,300 - 30,500 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
112 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,554 kg
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,278 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
380 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,820 mm
Width
1,780 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
396 kg
Payload
402 - 437 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
80 - 177 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 15.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
93 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
59 - 130 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Skoda
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

The Alpine A290 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.